April 25, 2024

New Zealand Dairy Giant Apologizes Over Tainted Formula

Three batches of whey protein concentrate, totaling 38 metric tons, tested positive for Clostridium botulinum, the company said. The bacterium can cause botulism, a rare and sometimes fatal illness. Fonterra, one of the world’s largest dairy exporters, said eight customers had been affected, in New Zealand, Australia, China, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia.

Fonterra said Monday that the contamination had been traced to a pipe that had not been properly cleaned in one of its New Zealand processing plants. Executives stressed that the source of the problem had been fixed.

The company’s chief executive, Theo Spierings, flew to Beijing for a news conference to address the issue.

“We deeply apologize to the people who have been affected by the issue,” Mr. Spierings said at the conference, which was broadcast by the Reuters news agency.

China and Vietnam stopped some dairy imports from New Zealand in response to the contamination scare, but the company said they had not issued blanket bans. Fonterra said China had banned products made in Australia using Fonterra’s whey protein, which had been produced in New Zealand, but had not banned any Australian whey protein.

The Ministry for Primary Industries “has confirmed that China has not closed the market to New Zealand dairy products and that China is being quite specific about the range of Fonterra products which it has temporarily suspended,” Fonterra’s New Zealand milk products managing director, Gary Romano, said Monday in a statement to the New Zealand stock market.

“Whole milk powder and skim milk powder have not been suspended,” he added.

The RIA Novosti news agency in Russia reported that Russia had banned imports of all Fonterra products, even though it was not on the list of affected countries.

The affected batches of whey protein were produced in May 2012, but the company said the first signs of contamination had not been spotted until March, when the product was tested in Australia. The specific strain was not identified until July 31. Fonterra executives have been questioned in New Zealand and China about why it took so long to identify the problem and alert consumers.

Fonterra said more than half of the affected product had gone to three companies: Coca-Cola, the Chinese beverage giant Wahaha and the New Zealand health food company Vitaco. It said processing methods at those companies had eliminated any danger from the bacteria.

But the main concerns focused on infant formula. Many Chinese consumers prefer to buy imported products because of concerns about the safety of domestic brands.

Nearly 90 percent of China’s $1.9 billion worth of milk powder imports last year originated in New Zealand, Reuters reported.

In 2008, the Chinese dairy company Sanlu and 21 others were found to have added the toxic chemical melamine to bulk up formulas. Six children died and thousands were sickened as a result. Fonterra owned part of Sanlu at the time.

“We totally understand that there’s concern of parents and other consumers around the world,” Mr. Spierings said at the news conference. “Parents have the right to know that infant nutrition and other dairy-related products is 100 percent safe.”

The New Zealand prime minister, John Key, said the government shared that concern. “We’re talking about the potential health implications for babies, and that’s something the government takes extremely seriously,” he told reporters at a news conference Monday.

According to a report by Rabobank, Fonterra is the fourth-largest dairy company by revenue, with $15.7 billion in revenue in 2012, behind Nestlé, Danone and Lactalis.

In New Zealand, the dairy industry accounts for about 11.5 billion New Zealand dollars, or about $9 billion, in export earnings, according to a research note by the bank ASB. That amounts to about a quarter of the country’s total goods exports.

The research note also said that the contamination scare would probably cause the country some short-term reputational damage but that it was too early to predict any longer-term effects.

“It would be naïve to think we’re going to get away without a bloody nose, but let’s hope the damage is limited to that,” New Zealand’s trade minister, Tim Groser, said at a news conference. The economic development minister, Steven Joyce, flew to Auckland on Monday to meet with senior members of Fonterra’s management.

The contamination is the third controversy that the company has faced in the past six years.

First there was the melamine scandal involving Sanlu. Then, early this year, it was disclosed Fonterra had discovered that residues of the agricultural chemical dicyandiamide in some of its whole milk powder, skim milk powder and buttermilk powder in September 2012. Although the company said the risks were minimal, use of the chemical on farmland was suspended.

Fonterra is a farmers’ cooperative and is not publicly listed, but it trades nonvoting units as shares on the New Zealand and Australian stock markets. On Monday, the shares opened down about 8 percent on the New Zealand exchange but went on to regain some of their value and closed at 6.86 dollars, a drop of 3.65 percent.

The New Zealand dollar also fell by about a cent to 0.7740 U.S. cent in early trading, before regaining some ground.

In Shanghai, China Modern Dairy shares rose 7.6 percent, while Biostime, which imports the bulk of its dairy products from Europe, surged 8.6 percent, Reuters reported. But Want Want China, which obtains most of its raw milk from Fonterra, fell 3.2 percent.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/06/business/global/new-zealand-dairy-giant-apologizes-over-tainted-formula.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Messy Path to Privatization for New Zealand Power Company

AUCKLAND — Aerial shots of majestic dams and steaming geothermal power stations amid lush countryside form the backdrop for television advertisements promoting the initial public offering of the government-owned electricity company Mighty River Power.

Selling stakes of as much as 49 percent of several state-owned companies has been a key part of the National Party’s policy since its successful 2011 campaign for a second term in government. On Friday, Mighty River Power is to be the first offering.

But behind the slick marketing campaign, the path to its partial privatization has been halting and messy, putting a big question mark over government hopes that New Zealanders will diversify away from real estate investment.

In late April, the opposition Labour Party and its potential coalition partner, the left-leaning Green Party, said that if elected to government next year, they would create an intermediary between generators and retailers that they say would slash prices for consumers.

The Labour Party says it will reduce power bills for businesses and save households between 230 and 330 New Zealand dollars, or between $190 and $280, per year. That amounts to 500 million to 700 million dollars annually.

“Since the deregulation of the market, electricity prices have risen at twice the rate of inflation,” said Labour’s finance spokesman, David Parker. “The lesson of the deregulation of the telecom industry in the 1980s is: If you don’t get the regulatory framework right before you privatize, you entrench and make worse profiteering.”

The government plans to run the companies on a mixed ownership model, retaining a 51 percent stake but listing the remainder on the New Zealand stock exchange, the NZX. On Wednesday, the government announced that the shares would be priced at 2.50 dollars.

Prime Minister John Key said the Labour Party was playing a “political game” that could deter foreign investment in New Zealand, but he insisted the opposition policy would not delay the I.P.O.’s of Mighty River Power or any other state-owned companies.

“They are policies of the far left that work in countries that want to do that, but if you’re a high-growth, modern O.E.C.D. country like New Zealand, far-left policies should be left for places like North Korea,” he said, referring to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a group of free-market democracies.

About 440,000 New Zealanders, or almost 10 percent of the population, registered their interest in buying Mighty River Power shares, according to government figures. Provisional government figures also state that about 113,000 will end up as shareholders. The offer will consist of as many as 686 million shares.

The government said Wednesday that 86.5 percent of Mighty River would be New Zealand owned: 26.9 percent by New Zealand retail investors, 8.6 percent by New Zealand institutions and 51 percent by the government.

Chris Marshall, who serves on a community board of the Auckland municipal government, said he was opposed to asset sales on principle but had decided to take advantage of the investment opportunity.

“Right from the start I thought: I don’t think it’s a good idea, but if they’re going to do it I’m going to buy as many shares as I can,” he said. “I think there’s a lot of people in that position.”

A former member of both the National Party and the Green Party, he said he believed the Labour-Green plan was, politically, a “masterstroke” but that he thought it was likely to deter a lot of potential investors.

“I don’t know anyone who’s a mom-and-dad investor who’s actually going for these shares,” said Mr. Marshall, who has traded shares himself for more than 40 years. “I know some friends, who are experienced investors, who haven’t; and one of them, who was going to buy it for himself, his wife, his grandchildren and whatever, he’s decided: ‘I can’t be bothered.”’

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/09/business/global/09iht-privatize09.html?partner=rss&emc=rss