April 25, 2024

‘Salinger,’ a Documentary Film

Harvey Weinstein, well, not so much.

But now the film producer may have to adopt the air of mystery for which Salinger was so famous. His company is preparing to offer a peek at a documentary about Salinger that is one of the unlikeliest projects ever to join its menagerie of potential Oscar contenders and box-office bait.

The film, “Salinger,” has been nine years in the making and is scheduled for release on Sept. 6. It is written, produced and directed by Shane Salerno, who is mostly known as a writer of action features like “Savages,” “Alien vs. Predator: Requiem” and “Armageddon.”

Selling the film may test even Mr. Weinstein’s Barnum-like skills. Moviegoers will be kept intentionally in the dark about what new information Mr. Salerno might have about the reclusive writer’s life — Mr. Salinger’s son, Matthew, challenges the notion that anyone close to his father in recent decades cooperated — and the Weinstein Company will have to strike a delicate balance in its marketing. It will have to raise the curtains a little, but not too much, as it seeks to build anticipation for the release.

As Mr. Salerno delivers his final cut, the marketers face particularly tough decisions about how much to show in a trailer. They must also figure out whether a screening at a late summer film festival, where prize contenders often start their march toward the Oscars, can work for a picture that has to protect its secrets while selling them.

It’s a difficult task in an era when fluttering fingers on smartphones can give away all the surprises. “I don’t know how we do this and not rob the audience,” Mr. Weinstein said in a telephone interview.

Associates of Mr. Salerno hint at never-before-seen photographs and interviews with aging intimates of Salinger, as well as secrets that they decline to describe. But there is skepticism. Speaking by phone, Matthew Salinger said that neither he nor his father were involved with the film. Nor, as far as he knows, were the seven or eight members of a small circle of people who were close to J. D. Salinger, he said. “There were barely enough people to form a circle in the last 30 or 40 years,” he said.

Asked whether he was confident that his father had not cooperated with Mr. Salerno, Mr. Salinger laughed. “That would be a yes,” he said.

Still, Mr. Weinstein has a proven track record with documentaries, having brought more than a touch of spectacle to the marketing of “Fahrenheit 9/11,” “Bully,” “Sicko,” and “Madonna: Truth or Dare.”

Mr. Weinstein snapped up “Salinger” quickly after Mr. Salerno showed it to him at an unusual 7:30 a.m. screening on Feb. 24, the day of the Academy Awards, according to people familiar with the film, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of confidentiality agreements. On his way to the ceremony he sealed a deal for the film that is part of a three-prong strategy, including an “American Masters” TV segment on PBS in January and an oral history in book form that Simon Schuster is to publish in September in tandem with the film’s theatrical release.

Potential foreign buyers may get at least a glimpse of the film as early as this month during the Cannes Film Festival.

The sell for “Salinger” begins with a tantalizing question: What has Mr. Salerno got that lured the only three prospective buyers who watched a rough version to jump in? People involved with the project offer teasing suggestions of new revelations, but no details.

Buddy Squires a seasoned documentarian who collaborated with Mr. Salerno as a producer and a cinematographer on “Salinger,” said recently in a brief phone conversation that “it is safe to say no one has ever seen a film like this.” He declined to say more.

Jonathan Karp, Simon Schuster’s president and publisher, said in an interview that the 750-page manuscript for the book “was revelatory, far beyond anything that’s been written about Salinger to date.” But like Mr. Squires, he would not reveal anything specific.

Susan Lacy, executive producer of the “American Masters” series, was just as circumspect. She said she was legally barred from discussing details of the film. But when asked whether it divulged any secrets, she replied, “Yes, I would just say that, yes, there are revelations.”

For the moment Mr. Salerno, who is finishing a final version, declines to be interviewed.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/09/movies/salinger-a-documentary-film.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: The Breakfast Meeting: Golden Globes Lift ‘Django,’ and Introducing Kanye’s Kilt

The Breakfast Meeting

What’s making news in media.

The Golden Globe nominations were announced on Thursday, with “Lincoln” leading the way with seven nominations, Brooks Barnes reported. But true to form, he writes, the awards from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association were spread about quite evenly, with “Argo” and “Django Unchained” close behind with five nominations apiece; “Zero Dark Thirty,” “Les Misérables” and “Silver Linings Playbook” each received four. The Globes will be handed out on Jan. 13, with Amy Poehler and Tina Fey as co-hosts of the telecast, a role recently filled by  Ricky Gervais.

  • Beyond their own merit, the Globes are considered important to gaining momentum heading into the Oscars, particularly this year when voting for Academy Awards nominees begins unusually early, on Monday. The biggest beneficiary, The Carpetbagger blog concludes, is “Django Unchained,” Quentin Tarantino’s bloody slave revenge fantasy from the Weinstein Company, which had failed to earn any nominations with the Screen Actors Guild on Wednesday.

Europe settled its antitrust case against four major publishers and Apple over the pricing of e-books along the lines of a similar settlement in the United States, Kevin J. O’Brien reports. The four and Apple agreed to end their attempt to set prices along what is called the “agency model,” which allows publishers to set a price and then provide the seller a commission on each sale. The settlement — which didn’t include the fifth major publisher, Pearson, owner of Penguin — frees Amazon to set whatever price it wants for books, a practice that has worried publishers who see Amazon dominating the e-book market. Despite those concerns, the European competition commissioner, Joaquín Almunia, said the issues were clear:

Obviously, the coordination of commercial behavior between competitors — here, with the help of Apple — is forbidden by our competition rules. Whatever the publishers’ initial concerns about retail prices, dealing with this situation through collusion is not acceptable.

The 12-12-12 benefit concert for Hurricane Sandy victims brought in at least $30 million from the sales of tickets and corporate sponsors, chief among them JPMorgan Chase Company, James C. McKinley Jr. reported. But that number does not include money donated online or via telephone to the Robin Hood Foundation, a charity that is distributing the money to aid groups.; organizers predict that the total will easily top the $35 million raised after the Sept. 11 attacks by the Concert for New York.

  • The Runway blog has the skinny on the kilt worn by Kanye West during Wednesday’s concert, which was among the many head-turning moments during the broadcast. It appears to be from Givenchy’s fall 2012 men’s wear collection, Denny Lee writes; and like any cultural phenomenon has its own Twitter handle: @KanyesSkirt.

 


Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/14/the-breakfast-meeting-golden-globes-lift-django-and-introducing-kanyes-kilt/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: Netflix Bests Starz in Bid for Disney Movies

LOS ANGELES — Walt Disney Studios said on Tuesday that it had completed a deal to show films from its Disney, Pixar and Marvel banners on Netflix, replacing a less lucrative pact with Starz.

The agreement is the first time that one of Hollywood’s Big Six studios has chosen Web streaming over pay television. Netflix has made similar “output” deals with smaller movie suppliers like DreamWorks Animation and the Weinstein Company, but all of the majors – Disney, Paramount, Universal, Warner Brothers, Sony and 20th Century Fox – have stuck with Starz, HBO or Showtime until now.

Library titles like “Dumbo,” “Alice in Wonderland” and “Pocahontas” will become immediately available on Netflix, Disney said. Netflix will begin streaming new-release Disney films starting in late 2016, when the existing accord with Starz expires. The deal announced on Tuesday includes direct-to-DVD titles.

Financial terms were not disclosed. The deal does not include films from DreamWorks Studios, which has a theatrical distribution arrangement with Disney but relies on Showtime as a pay-TV partner. However, the deal will ultimately include movies from Lucasfilm, which Disney is in the process of acquiring.

Ted Sarandos, Netflix’s chief content officer, called the deal “a bold leap forward for Internet television.” Janice Marinelli, president of Disney-ABC Domestic Television, said in a statement, “Netflix continues to meet the demands of its subscribers in today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape.”

The so-called pay TV window is one of the entertainment industry’s most important business tools.

In the past, Starz, HBO and Showtime have paid steep licensing fees of about $20 million a picture for exclusive rights a few months after films arrive on DVD. But Netflix — capitalizing on a consumer shift to streaming content on computers, tablets and Internet-connected televisions — has been aggressively going after the business by offering more lucrative terms.

With the Disney deal, Netflix will be able to offer customers exclusive access to a pipeline of films that are reliably some of the year’s biggest box office successes. Netflix has also made it a priority to strengthen its children’s and family offerings.

What does the loss of Disney mean for Starz? Anything that increases the marketplace clout of Netflix is damaging. Moreover, the premium cable service does not have the original programming strength of HBO or Showtime to fall back on.

Starz will continue to have films from Sony, but the absence of Disney movies will be a hole in its offerings. In a statement on Tuesday, however, Starz said that it had decided to part ways with Disney, not the other way around.

“Our decision not to extend the agreement for Disney output past that time allows us the opportunity to implement our plan to dramatically ramp up our investment in exclusive, premium-quality original series which will best meet the needs of our distributors and subscribers,” the company said in the statement.

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/04/netflix-bests-starz-in-bid-for-disney-movies/?partner=rss&emc=rss

YouTube Is Said to Be Near a Major Film Rental Deal

Sony Pictures Entertainment, Universal Pictures and Warner Brothers have agreed to rent movies via YouTube, according to two studio executives who spoke on condition of anonymity because they said YouTube wanted to make the announcement. Rental fees are expected to be comparable to those charged by rivals like iTunes.

YouTube, however, has only half of the industry’s top players on board. Still on the sidelines are Walt Disney Studios, which is closely aligned with Apple, and 20th Century Fox and Paramount Pictures. Paramount’s corporate owner, Viacom, is still battling YouTube in court over copyright infringement. These three studios together control about 60 percent of the North American movie market.

YouTube declined to comment on reports of new rental deals. “We’ve steadily been adding more and more titles since launching movies for rent on YouTube over a year ago and now have thousands of titles available,” said YouTube in a statement.

Lionsgate Entertainment, the Weinstein Company and independent filmmakers already make films available for rent on the site for $2 to $4, including “Scary Movie 4,” “3:10 to Yuma” and “Saw.”

But the arrival of bigger Sony, Universal and Warner movies would give the streaming service a shot in the arm as it tries to compete with Apple’s iTunes, Amazon.com and Netflix. YouTube has been trying several strategies to keep people on the site for longer periods as it tries to poach viewers from TV and attract ad dollars.

Despite YouTube’s popularity — people view videos on the site two billion times a day — its film rentals do not appear to have gained much traction.

Still, YouTube offers movie studios more than just viewers, said James L. McQuivey, a digital media analyst at Forrester Research. Google can provide valuable data on how many people have searched for movies and which terms they used to search.

“That’s just a marketing chain of cause and effect that nobody else asking movie studios for rights to rentals can show,” Mr. McQuivey said. “You don’t necessarily need to show that a rental has been blockbuster successful to show a movie studio that it’s an avenue worth pursuing.”

Studios have repeatedly said that their digital strategies involve making on-demand deals with as many legitimate Web sites as they can — reflecting lessons learned from the music industry’s attempt to shut down digital consumption. They are also eager to replace dwindling DVD revenue. The latest rental plans were first reported by TheWrap.com, a movie industry blog.

But the chill between YouTube and Hollywood has taken time to ease. During its first few years, YouTube stood behind the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and told media companies it was not legally required to remove unauthorized material from its site unless specifically asked to do so by the owner. The stance provoked a $1 billion lawsuit from Viacom and broad animosity from media executives.

The willingness of mainstream studios like Sony, Universal and Warner to finally play ball reflects the work YouTube has done to make its portal look less like an online video garage sale. The site has also made it easier for media companies to take down pirated video content. It does not hurt that a New York federal judge last year sided with YouTube in the Viacom lawsuit; Viacom has since appealed.

“The fact that there’s still a few studios holding out on Google just goes to show you that even though this is an obvious no-brainer decision, the fear of Google still rests heavily on people’s minds,” Mr. McQuivey said. “But eventually they’ll all be there because why on earth would you refuse to put your content in the path of millions of users?”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=dd5fdb6136d1ec9f9de306662cb5c798