October 10, 2024

DealBook: Online Currency Draws Big Investors

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss have been many things in a short time: Olympic rowers. Nemeses of Mark Zuckerberg. Characters on “The Simpsons.” Now they can add a new label: bitcoin moguls.

The 31-year-old identical twins have amassed since last summer what appears to be one of the single largest portfolios of the online currency that has caused such a stir in financial and technology circles.

An array of speculators have now bid up the price of the bitcoin to the point where the outstanding supply of the digital money was worth $1.3 billion at last count. The Winklevii — as they are popularly known — say they own nearly 1 percent of that, or some $11 million.

The decision by the brothers to go public with their position signals a new stage for what has been an experimental alternative to national currencies. Created in 2009 by a programmer or programmers known only by a pseudonym, the bitcoin world has been dominated by anonymous programmers and traders.

Now mainstream investments in the digital money are starting to emerge. On Thursday, a group of venture capitalists, including Andreessen Horowitz, announced that they were funding a bitcoin-related company, OpenCoin.

Other Silicon Valley venture firms, while not holding bitcoins, are starting to show interest in the technology. Tim Draper of the firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson put money into CoinLab, which is doing bitcoin-related projects. Tribeca Venture Partners announced this week that it was putting money into Coinsetter, a start-up trading platform for the currency.

Bitcoin is the new new thing but the question is whether it will end up in the same dustbin as Dutch tulips and Pets.com, or, as its backers believe, turn into a disruptive technology with the potential to revolutionize the global payments system.

The perils have been obvious over the last two days, as bitcoin has gone through its most volatile stretch ever, sinking from a high of $260 a bitcoin to a low of $105, before ending Wednesday around $175. On Thursday it was down again to $120 when one of the major online exchanges called a 12-hour halt on trading. The volatility has raised questions about whether bitcoin can even be called a currency.

“It’s not something I’d want to be involved in or have any investors’ money involved with,” said Steve Hanke, a professor specializing in alternative currencies at Johns Hopkins University. “To say highly speculative would be the understatement of the century.”

But the 6-foot-5 Winklevii were unfazed by the latest tumult. Indeed, the brothers said they used the low prices to buy more. They argue that bitcoin will have much further to soar once a broader audience sees its virtues: a unit of exchange that can be moved around the world at the click of a button without requiring any payments to Western Union or American Express.

“People say it’s a Ponzi scheme, it’s a bubble,” said Cameron Winklevoss. “People really don’t want to take it seriously. At some point that narrative will shift to ‘virtual currencies are here to stay.’ We’re in the early days.”

Other champions of bitcoin also believe that it could mark a new chapter in the history of money.

“Three eras of currency,” Chris Dixon, a partner at Andreesen Horowitz and well-known technology investor, recently wrote on a personal Web site. “Commodity based, e.g., gold; politically based, e.g., dollar; and math based, e.g., bitcoin.”

For those whose idea of money still involves greenbacks and metal coins, bitcoins do not exist in any explicit physical form. The creators wrote algorithms that allow only a finite number of bitcoins to be created — the count is currently around 11 million — with new coins “mined” by programmers who solve mathematical riddles.
The coins can then be bought and sold through upstart exchanges, and held in what are known as virtual wallets.

So far, few real companies accept bitcoins as payment, and the primary place they can be used is an online bazaar, known as Silk Road, where narcotics are the main wares for sale. But the currency’s believers see a future in which Starbucks and Amazon take bitcoins. For their part, the Winklevoss twins have used some of their bitcoin to pay for the services of a Ukrainian computer programmer who has worked on the site of their venture capital firm.

While bitcoin has amassed a cult following since its beginnings, it has set off a frenzy in recent weeks as the price spiked to $260 per bitcoin early Wednesday after trading at $35 at the beginning of March. Some of the credit for this surge is given to the banking crisis in Cyprus, which raised some questions about the viability of the euro currency.

“We have elected to put our money and faith in a mathematical framework that is free of politics and human error,” Tyler Winklevoss said.

Bitcoin is far from the first bet the brothers have made on an emerging technology. As students at Harvard College, the twins founded a social networking site, ConnectU, and enlisted their schoolmate, Mark Zuckerberg, to help them build the company. After Mr. Zuckerberg went off to start Facebook, the brothers sued him, accusing him of stealing their idea — a story that was dramatized in the movie “The Social Network.” The case was settled with the brothers being given $20 million in cash and Facebook shares that are now worth over $200 million.

They have parlayed that fortune into Winklevoss Capital. Their first two investments were in Hukkster, a start-up shopping Web site and SumZero, an online community for professional money managers.

The brothers began dabbling in bitcoin last summer when the dollar value of a single coin was still in the single digits. In addition to the purchase of bitcoins, they also say they have invested in a bitcoin-related company, but declined to disclose which one. The currency itself exists as a string of letters and numbers. In order to keep their holdings secure from hackers, they have taken those codes off networked computers and saved them on small flash drives. They said they have put the drives in safe deposit boxes at banks in three different cities.

It’s hard to verify how the Winklevoss holdings compare with other bitcoin players given the anonymity of accounts, and the twins believe that some early users of the system probably have holdings that are at least as large.

A Maltese company, Exante, started a hedge fund that the company says has bought up about 82,000 bitcoins — or about $10 million as of Thursday — with money from wealthy investors. A founder of the fund, Anatoli Knyazev, said his main concern is hackers and government regulators, who have so far mostly left the currency alone.

These investments were all in an uncertain state on Thursday after the big price swings and the shutdown of trading on Mt. Gox, a Japan-based company that claims to handle 80 percent of all bitcoin trades. Mt. Gox said in a statement that the problems were a result of the currency’s popularity, making it impossible to process all the incoming orders. It added that it was not the victim of hackers but “instead victim of our own success!”

The Winklevoss brothers said that this week’s chaotic trading are only “growing pains” like those seen by other young technologies, and not enough to scare them away.

“It has been four years and it has yet to be discredited as a viable alternative to fiat currency,” said Tyler Winklevoss. “We could be totally wrong, but we are curious to see this play out a lot more.”

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/04/11/as-big-investors-emerge-bitcoin-gets-ready-for-its-close-up/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Brazil Steps Up Investments in Overlooked Tech Start-Ups

Marcio Spata, left, and Eduardo Klingelhoefer de Sa of BNDES, Brazil's state-controlled development bank.André Vieira for The New York TimesMarcio Spata, left, and Eduardo Klingelhoefer de Sa of BNDES, Brazil’s state-controlled development bank.

RIO DE JANEIRO — For the last few years, Brazilian start-ups have begun to successfully draw blue-chip Silicon Valley venture firms. But in the process, promising technology segments have been ignored.

Although private firms are readily investing in e-commerce and other hot areas, fields like nanotechnology, robotics and information technology — considered critical to transforming Brazil’s commodity-export, consumption-dependent economy — are falling by the wayside.

Rather than leave innovation financing solely to private investment firms, Brazilian officials decided several years ago to step in and shepherd nascent companies. And in 2007, Brazil’s national development bank, BNDES, started Criatec I, a 10-year venture capital fund of 100 million reais, or about $48 million, aimed at start-ups. Foreign venture capital firms have been welcome to make follow-on investments. To date, not one has.

Instead, Brazil has doubled down on its goal of promoting technology growth. This week, the bank awarded a new fund of 186 million reais, or $89 million, to Icone Investments. BNDES is providing most of the capital, with contributions from regional public banks.

Though the government has been taking the lead, it has not been for a lack of interest from private venture capital. Over the last two years, Redpoint Ventures, Accel Partners and Sequoia have become active here, as have Peter Thiel, Dave McClure and European and Israeli investors. But BNDES believes a huge void remains in early-stage financing.

“They are voraciously investing in all the paste-and-copy stuff, the copycats. They are not really into technology innovation,” said Robert E. Binder, whose private firm, Antera Resource Management, comanages the initial Criatec fund with São Paulo-based Inseed Investments.

Innovation is an urgent matter in Brazil, economists say. According to the Research Institute for Industrial Development, this year through September, the country ran a $38.7 billion trade deficit in technology-intensive goods, an increase from last year. Brazil’s economy is highly vulnerable to global economic uncertainty, which is reflected in the country’s recent third-quarter growth figures.

A looming demographic shift is also a concern. In 2030, Brazil’s population is expected to decline and get increasingly older, potentially straining government resources.

Venture capital firms investing in Brazil’s start-up boom regard Criatec as well intentioned. Eric Acher, a founding partner at Monashees Capital, called it a “great learning experience to focus on innovation.”

Anderson Thees of Redpoint e.Ventures also praised the fund. “They are probably tapping into very good opportunities early,” he said.

Yet these and other venture funds have yet to team up with Criatec on investments.

For instance, Criatec looks for companies developing technology and with clear intellectual property that can be licensed or retained, Mr. Thees said. “Silicon Valley is less interested in this,” he said.

Mr. Acher agreed: “I don’t think at the moment Silicon Valley is looking for technology innovation in Brazil,” adding that the return did not yet justify the level of risk involved.

BNDES expected such risk aversion when it created Criatec.

“Not even Brazilian funds were showing interest in early-stage companies,” said Eduardo Rath Fingerl, one of the fund’s architects. “We knew it would have to be entirely a BNDES effort.”

BNDES, short for Banco Nacional do Desenvolvimento (the National Development Bank in English), has long played an important role in Brazil’s rise. Formed in 1952, the development bank initially financed major infrastructure. Its scope and size grew considerably under former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who thought Brazil needed brand-name multinationals to gain respect overseas.

In 2003, the bank disbursed $11.7 billion, but by 2010, that figure had skyrocketed to $96.3 billion. It has provided subsidized loans to most large Brazilian companies, including the oil giant Petrobras and the mining concern Vale. The bank has also supported foreign companies, including $3 billion to American Airlines to buy planes from Embraer, a Brazilian manufacturer.

Its dominance here has drawn criticism. Some contend the government bank has the wrong priorities, including financing mergers and acquisitions, which some contend should be left to the private sector.

“Long-term credit is still a problem in Brazil,” the Brazilian economist Mansueto Almeida said. However, “Brazil today is very different from what it was 20 years ago. It has very active capital markets.”

Criatec, however, is one of the bank’s smallest and least-controversial programs. Mr. Almeida said that with this initiative, “it is trying to do the right thing. That’s exactly what one expects from a development bank.”

Criatec I has had a slow track record of success. Usix Technologies, an insurance market exchange technology firm that received backing from Criatec, was acquired by the publicly traded Ebix in 2010. It has also backed companies with promise, like Amazon Dreams, which has developed patented techniques to produce açai and other berries with higher antioxidant content.

Some foreign investors are starting to look at the Criatec I portfolio. Intel Capital, the venture arm of the chip maker Intel, is evaluating the location intelligence software company Geofusion, according to a person briefed on the talks, who asked to be anonymous because the discussions were ongoing.

Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers showed interest this year in the agro-pesticide company Bug Agentes Biologicos but said the start-up first needed $10 million in revenue. Now that company is discussing a strategic partnership with Israel’s Bio-Bee Biological Systems. But such potential deals again indicate that foreign venture capital firms are still not courting the smaller start-ups.

“They all want to find these companies with $10 million to $15 million in revenue, but there just is not deal flow at that size,” said a person familiar with Kleiner Perkins’s outreach plans, who also asked to remain anonymous as the talks were private.

Based on 2012 estimates, only one Criatec I company of the 33 in business will cross $10 million in revenue.

Amazon Dreams’ revenue, for example, is still negligible despite the health craze in the United States for açai berries.

BNDES also established the fund to help out academics who have great ideas but don’t have the same success in obtaining the private sector financing that entrepreneurs do.

“Brazil has a lot of intelligence,” said Mr. Rath Fingerl, who retired from BNDES last year, but “the great difficulty is bridging the divide between the scientific and business communities.”

The fund also has limitations. For example, the bank holds veto power on most company decisions even though it is a minority shareholder. Yet, it appears quite flexible as it seeks co-investments.

BNDES’s political influence in Criatec companies “is totally negotiable,” said Marcio Spata, head of the Criatec fund at the development bank. “We are always open to changing our rights” for appropriate offers.

Eduardo Klingelhoefer de Sa, head of the department of funds at BNDES, said, “We would be very happy if private investors come so that our stakes are reduced.”

A version of this article appeared in print on 12/06/2012, on page B9 of the NewYork edition with the headline: Brazil Steps Up Investments in Crucial, but Overlooked, Technology Start-Ups.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/brazil-steps-up-investments-in-overlooked-tech-start-ups/?partner=rss&emc=rss