April 25, 2024

Author’s Views on Gay Marriage Fuel Call for Boycott

One of them turned into a problem this week.

A planned boycott aimed at this science-fiction film, which is to be released on Nov. 1, gained momentum just as Summit Entertainment and its partners were getting ready to introduce “Ender’s Game,” with two of its stars, Harrison Ford and Asa Butterfield, at the Comic-Con International fan convention in San Diego next Thursday. At issue is the author of the novel on which the film is based, Orson Scott Card; his views on homosexuality; and his public stance against same-sex marriage.

A book with a futuristic battle story published in 1985, “Ender’s Game” has nothing to do with gay marriage. Indeed, Glaad, a gay-rights organization that tracks media, reviewed the script and found nothing to criticize.

As for Mr. Card’s background and views, they were hardly a secret. A Mormon and a descendant of Brigham Young, he was on the board of the National Organization for Marriage, which has opposed same-sex unions, from 2009 until this year. In March a DC Comics project with Mr. Card as a co-writer fell apart when its illustrator, Chris Sprouse, quit as an online petition called for Mr. Card’s removal.

By Monday evening, Mr. Card was issuing a public plea for tolerance of his views — “with the recent Supreme Court ruling, the gay marriage issue becomes moot,” he noted in a statement to the Entertainment Weekly Web site — in response to a planned boycott that had burst into prominence only the day before, when The Huffington Post published an article about a Web site called Skipendersgame.com.

Speaking by telephone on Wednesday, Patrick Yacco and Jono Jarrett, who helped start the Web boycott campaign in conjunction with Geeks Out, an organization that promotes gay-themed pop culture, said they were stunned by the sudden attention to their effort, which had been online since April. “We were really surprised by how this has turned out,” Mr. Yacco said.

He added that their bare-bones boycott site had gathered about 2,000 pledges of support from Sunday to Friday. That many boycotters would barely dent the audience of millions that typically shows up for the opening weekend of a heavily marketed science-fiction blockbuster.

Web-savvy individuals and bootstrap organizations for years have been using Internet sites and social media to call for boycotts of movies that somehow offend them. After its release last month, “World War Z,” about zombies, drew a boycott call for supposedly being too favorable to Israel. Perhaps less seriously, “Iron Man 3” and “Star Trek Into Darkness” were targeted for having been released abroad before they were seen in the United States.

Mr. Jarrett attributed the widespread interest in the “Ender’s Game” boycott campaign, which by now has been featured by CNN, NPR and The Christian Science Monitor, among others, to the simplicity of its appeal for a public shunning of Mr. Card.

“It’s very, very clear what he said and what he stands for,” Mr. Jarrett said.

An assistant to Mr. Card said he was abroad and not available for an interview.

Mr. Card has been a force in the science-fiction world since the publication of “Ender’s Game,” which was based on a story he wrote in the 1970s. It eventually spawned a series of books, which began with the recruitment and training of a boy, Andrew Wiggin, known as Ender, as an interplanetary fighter.

Though Hollywood pursued rights to “Ender’s Game” for years, Mr. Card was protective of the property, and at one time intended to write his own screenplay. Eventually he optioned the books to Warner Brothers, which tried to turn them into a film for the director Wolfgang Petersen (“Das Boot,” “Troy”), before giving up. That cleared the way for the current production, which is partly financed by OddLot Entertainment and its owner, the heiress Gigi Pritzker. (The new movie is written and directed by Gavin Hood, who directed “X Men Origins: Wolverine,” and counts Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, both heavily credited fantasy filmmakers, among its key producers.)

Some of the views to which Mr. Jarrett and others object have been posted by Glaad as part of a Web-based “accountability project.” It cites published articles in which Mr. Card argued against the acceptance of homosexuality by Mormons, for instance, and contended that gay behavior often begins with sexual abuse.

Still, not every advocate of gay equality and same-sex marriage is convinced that turning away from “Ender’s Game,” which cost about $110 million to make, is the best way to counter Mr. Card.

“No way am I boycotting,” said Dustin Lance Black, who in 2009 won an Oscar for writing “Milk,” about the gay activist Harvey Milk, and who campaigned against California’s Proposition 8, which sought to ban gay marriage.

Speaking from London on Wednesday, Mr. Black — who, like Mr. Card, comes from a Mormon family — said he would rather engage with, than shut out, political and cultural adversaries. “We haven’t been getting the numbers we’ve seen by disengaging,” Mr. Black said, referring to a rise in public acceptance of same-sex marriage and other measures of gay equality.

Summit executives declined to be interviewed about the boycott call or Mr. Card’s involvement in the movie.

In a statement, Lionsgate, Summit’s corporate parent, noted that it has released movies with gay themes, including “The Perks of Being a Wallflower,” and has long recognized same-sex unions and domestic partnerships in its own corporate benefits programs. It said the company does not agree with Mr. Card’s personal views or those of the National Organization for Marriage.

“The simple fact is that neither the underlying book nor the film itself reflect these views in any way, shape or form,” the statement said. It also said Lionsgate expects to host a benefit premiere for some gay-related cause in connection with “Ender’s Game.”

Mr. Jarrett and Mr. Yacco said they were only beginning to solicit support from larger groups that might lend teeth to their boycott plans. Mr. Yacco said that he would attend the Comic-Con convention but that he had not yet decided whether or how he might extend the Skip Ender’s Game campaign there.

A twist in the debate may be coming in October, when Open Court, a Chicago-based publisher, plans to release “Ender’s Game and Philosophy: Genocide Is Child’s Play,” a book of essays. In an entry titled “How Queer Is Ender,” two writers, Nicolas Michaud and Jessica Watkins, conclude that the novel and its world “aren’t so much homophobic as they are sexist.”

“Ender’s Game” and other books in the series, the authors argue, actually express “the yearning and suffering of a deep unrequited love between men, which can never really be eased by the inferior love of women.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/13/business/media/authors-anti-gay-views-fuel-call-for-boycott-of-enders-game.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Uneven Growth for Film Studio With a Message

In Hollywood, doing both turns out to be more complicated than you might think.

Participant Media, the film industry’s most visible attempt at social entrepreneurship, turned seven this year without quite sorting out whether a company that trades in movies with a message can earn its way in a business that has been tough even for those who peddle 3-D pandas and such.

“The Beaver,” Participant’s latest picture, is a flop. A mental health-themed drama with Mel Gibson in the lead, it has taken in less than $1 million at the domestic box office since opening early last month, though it cost about $20 million to make, and was backed by a vigorous effort to build a following among those who treat depression.

Despite accolades — Participant took 11 Oscar nominations in 2006, and films like “The Cove” and “An Inconvenient Truth” later became winners — nothing from the company has approached blockbuster status. The biggest ticket-seller among its films — it has produced about 30 — was “Charlie Wilson’s War” in 2007. A star-packed tale about the unintended consequences of America’s past dealings with Afghanistan, it took in just $66.7 million in domestic theaters.

And Participant’s owner, the eBay co-founder Jeffrey S. Skoll, is still pouring in money. In an interview, Mr. Skoll put the amount he has invested at “hundreds of millions to date, with much more to follow.”

Yet Mr. Skoll last week described his growing enterprise — which also publishes books, produces television programs, has a wide Internet presence through its TakePart social action network, and owns a major stake in Summit Entertainment — as only the beginning of a media empire that he and his partners expect to surpass eBay in terms of impact, if not profit.

“This is the very early stage, as far as I’m concerned,” said Mr. Skoll, who joined Participant’s chief executive, James G. Berk, in a broad discussion of their experience in an industry in which many players share their commitment to social causes, but only rarely have tried to build a business around their views.

Ted Leonsis, with his indie-minded SnagFilms, and Philip Anschutz, with his family-oriented Walden Media, have both made forays into film-related social entrepreneurship. But neither has matched Mr. Skoll’s attempt to penetrate the studio system by financing and producing a broad range of pictures that are intended to set off not just ticket sales, but social and political action campaigns.

In the past, those have aimed to pressure senators into ratifying the New Start arms control treaty (via “Countdown to Zero”) or to press for reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (with “North Country”).

Mr. Skoll and Mr. Berk spoke in a conference room on the third floor of their new quarters in Beverly Hills. The offices, Mr. Berk said, are made entirely of recycled material — the carpet comes from old tires, but the look is stylish and green. From the second floor, Mr. Skoll operates philanthropies to which he has donated, by his count, about $1.5 billion.

Eventually, Mr. Skoll said, Participant is expected to become self-sustaining, though both expansion and the soft performance of some films have kept it from making a profit to date.

In strictly financial terms, said Mr. Berk — who was previously the chief executive of Gryphon Colleges, Fairfield Communities, and Hard Rock Cafe International — Participant’s film business appears to perform “just above the median” for similar size companies, thanks to a slight edge in home entertainment sales. Those are helped by long, intensive campaigns that urge like-minded activists to rally for years around message films like “An Inconvenient Truth,” the global warming documentary.

In measuring its success, Mr. Berk added, Participant sometimes resorts to an unusual standard: On losers, the company assesses whether Mr. Skoll could have exerted more impact simply by spending his money philanthropically.

By that measure, “Waiting for Superman,” about the failures of public education, was a hit, Mr. Berk said. It had just over $6 million in worldwide ticket sales, but managed to put the issue of teacher competence into what he calls “the pool of worries” for millions who were caught up in a fierce discussion of the film’s premise, that failing children are hindered by union-protected teachers.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=1c7ed61078839c02decb5f401f8a8125