April 25, 2024

Couple Donates $150 Million to Help End Poverty

“More than a billion people live on less than $1.25 a day,” said Robert E. King, who, together with his wife, Dorothy, made the gift. “That’s just not right.”

The new Stanford Institute for Innovation in Developing Economies, which has been nicknamed SEED, will be housed in the Graduate School of Business but will draw students and faculty from around the university.

The gift is one of the largest Stanford has received this year. The Kings said that was one reason they had decided to give the money to Stanford rather than starting a freestanding nonprofit like the Thrive Foundation for Youth, which they established to support research into programs helping young people and their parents.

“The relationships the university has in Silicon Valley, the range of expertise it has among its professors — it can’t be replicated,” Mrs. King said. “The university can make our money more fruitful than we could on our own.”

The institute will teach students, who it hopes will go on to create programs and businesses like the one established by David Spitzer, a Stanford M.B.A. He started Mountain Hazelnut Venture Ltd., to grow hazelnut trees in Bhutan, a tiny, land-locked country wedged between China and India. The company hopes to produce some 40,000 tons of hazelnuts, giving local farmers a lucrative export product and restoring trees to mountainsides stripped by logging.

Hau Lee, a supply chain expert at the Stanford business school who will lead the new institute, estimates that Mountain Hazelnut, which has pledged a portion of profits to local communities, will end up employing 10 percent of the country’s population.

“Many people are doing relief or aid operations, but at the institute, we will be asking how we can stimulate entrepreneurs and business ideas so that the people receiving aid today can became self-sufficient so they won’t need aid in the future,” Professor Lee said.

Mr. King, a Stanford business school alumnus, is largely unknown outside start-ups and venture capitalists, but has built a fortune out of R. Eliot King Company and Peninsula Capital, which was one of the first investors in Baidu, the Chinese version of Google.

That investment came about when Xiangmin Cai, a Chinese graduate student who had lived with the Kings, introduced Mr. King to Robin Li, Baidu’s founder.

“I set up an office at 3000 Sand Hill Road, where I managed money,” Mr. King said, referring to the home of many Silicon Valley venture capital firms. “I’d sit there, looking out at cows grazing, and people would drop in on me and we’d talk.”

The Kings demurred when Stanford offered to put their name on the new institute, and Mr. King was reluctant to talk much about the investments that had made him wealthy. “We’ve had success,” he said simply.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=eef1bd524f4094f2a0ad62f72b9c90fc

Spitzer and Slate Face Defamation Lawsuit

The suits, one in federal court seeking at least $60 million, and another in New York state court for at least $30 million, were filed on behalf of two insurance brokers who were the target of a prosecution by Mr. Spitzer when he was the attorney general of New York.

The insurance executives, William Gilman and Edward McNenney, formerly of Marsh McLennan, accused Mr. Spitzer and Slate of defamation.

Both men were acquitted of all but one of the charges they faced.

Marsh, however, which faced a raft of accusations, including fixing prices and rigging bids, settled the case for an $850 million fine.

In a column he wrote last summer, Mr. Spitzer used the case as an example of what he said was a financial system that still lacked sufficient government regulation. The column, titled “They Still Don’t Get It,” took issue with a Wall Street Journal editorial that picked apart Mr. Spitzer’s prosecutions of insurance giants like the American International Group.

In the column, Mr. Spitzer does not mention either Mr. Gilman or Mr. McNenney by name. But he does mention the $850 million settlement and makes a general reference to “criminal conduct” at the company.

Mr. Spitzer said Monday that he would be defended vigorously. “This lawsuit is entirely frivolous,” he added.

David Plotz, Slate’s editor, said, “This is a baseless lawsuit and we look forward to defending it.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d11d9052c67cdcabf44073ff8f0c7eb6