April 20, 2024

EU to Start Trade Talks With US Despite Scandal

The Commission, the EU’s executive branch that leads the negotiations on behalf of its 28 members, said the planned start of talks in Washington next Monday “should not be affected” by the surveillance scandal that has emerged in recent days.

However, it insisted that the trans-Atlantic atmosphere needed to clear up for the talks to be successful.

“For such a comprehensive and ambitious negotiation to succeed, there needs to be confidence, transparency and clarity among the negotiating partners,” it said in a statement.

The talks are likely to take at least a few years.

The first week of technical negotiations start in Washington on Monday but political outrage over the U.S. eavesdropping allegations had raised questions over whether they would go ahead.

On Sunday, an apparent leak from former U.S. intelligence systems analyst Edward Snowden in Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine allegedly showed that the National Security Agency bugged the EU’s diplomatic offices in Washington and infiltrated its computer network.

The magazine said the NSA took similar measures to listen in on the EU’s mission to the United Nations in New York, and also used its secure facilities at NATO headquarters in Brussels to dial into telephone maintenance systems that would have allowed it to intercept senior EU officials’ calls and Internet traffic.

French President Francois Hollande on Monday suggested that the scandal could derail the free-trade negotiations. He insisted that the U.S. clarify the situation and end any possible eavesdropping immediately. There could be no negotiations unless Washington provided such guarantees, he insisted.

France had been reluctant to start the talks as it insisted on keeping the movie and television business out of the negotiations to shield Europe’s audiovisual industry from Hollywood.

Yet EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht said hinging the start of talks on such political issues as the eavesdropping scandal would amount to the EU shooting itself in the foot. The EU, he said, was entering talks out of self-interest, not to be subservient to the United States.

Any far-reaching EU-US trade deal could provide a big boost to growth and jobs by eliminating tariffs and other barriers that have long plagued economic relations — a free trade pact would create a market with common standards and regulations across countries that together account for nearly half the global economy.

A recent EU-commissioned study showed that a trade pact could boost the EU’s output by 119 billion euro ($159 billion) a year and the U.S. economy’s by 95 billion euros ($127 billion).

Another estimate showed eliminating tariffs alone would add $180 billion to U.S. and EU gross domestic product in five years’ time while boosting exports on both sides by about 17 percent. That could add about 0.5 percent annually to the EU’s GDP and 1 percent to the U.S.

For Europe in particular, that extra growth could be crucial to help pay high public debt and bring down unemployment, which is at record highs.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2013/07/02/world/europe/ap-eu-eu-us-trade-talks-.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Ministers Meet to Study Fixes on Greek Debt

After the private gathering, the prime minister of Luxembourg, Jean-Claude Juncker, who heads the group of euro-area finance ministers, said that Greece’s financial assistance program “does need a further adjustment” and that it would be discussed at the group’s next meeting on May 16.

Mr. Juncker told reporters that European Union officials were “excluding the restructuring option which is discussed heavily in certain quarters of the financial markets,” according to Bloomberg News.

France, Germany, Italy and Spain were represented at the meeting in Luxembourg, which also included the president of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, and Olli Rehn, the European commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, Mr. Juncker said.

A spokesman for the Greek finance ministry did not respond to questions about the nature of the talks.

But after an evening of intense speculation, Athens confirmed in a statement that its finance minister, George Papaconstantinou, attended the meeting and discussed the country’s economic predicament. “The minister was invited to exchange views” including economic developments in Greece, the statement said, denying an online report by Der Spiegel of Germany that Greece might leave the euro zone. That report caused a sharp drop in the euro, which fell to $1.4337 in New York, from $1.4530 late Thursday.

“It is clear that during this meeting it was never discussed or posed as an issue whether Greece would remain in the euro zone,” the statement said, according to Reuters.

That Mr. Papaconstantinou traveled to Luxembourg for these discussions suggested that Greece might finally be prepared to concede what analysts have been arguing for more than a year: that Greece’s debt, which is expected to exceed 150 percent of gross domestic product in the coming years, is unsustainable.

So far, Greek and European officials have said consistently that a debt restructuring that would cause bondholders to suffer a haircut, or a loss on their holdings, was out of the question. But that stance may not preclude a softer option in which bondholders might be persuaded to exchange their shorter maturity debt for securities with longer maturities and perhaps even a lower interest rate.

The majority of the bondholders are French, German and Greek banks, as well as the European Central Bank.

Referred to as a reprofiling, this softer approach was used successfully in Uruguay in 2003 and for weeks now has been a hot topic for discussion among policy makers in Europe as well as economists and analysts at investment banks.

A reprofiling would allow bondholders to avoid the stark losses they would face under a restructuring and would also give breathing room to Greece to generate enough cash to begin paying its debts.

Detractors say that such a solution, while appropriate for Uruguay, which suffered from a liquidity crisis, does not go far enough in the case of Greece, which is confronting a huge debt burden.

Policy makers at the European Central Bank are convinced that a Greek default would quickly undermine confidence elsewhere in the euro area and raise borrowing cost for other countries like Portugal and Ireland. It was also not clear what Greece would gain from such a move because its banks would fail and it would be years before the country could borrow internationally again.

Asked about default speculation at a news conference on Thursday, Mr. Trichet said, “It is not in the cards.”

The meeting in Luxembourg, made up of just a few ministers and senior officials, frustrated the euro zone nations not invited.

Without the status of a formal meeting, the gathering could not make any decisions, but smaller euro zone nations are sensitive about suggestions that the bigger nations are effectively deciding policy.

Jack Ewing contributed reporting from Frankfurt.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/07/business/global/07euro.html?partner=rss&emc=rss