April 25, 2024

You’re the Boss: How Social Ventures Can Produce Profits

Laurie Loew donates 25 percent of her commissions.Courtesy Give Realty.Laurie Loew donates 25 percent of her commissions.
Branded

Last decade, it was all about going green to differentiate your company in the hearts and minds of consumers. Today, it’s social entrepreneurship that’s the nice new thing that can make your company stand out.

The 2010 Edelman goodpurpose global study (PDF), found that 87 percent of American consumers expected businesses to consider societal interests at least as much as their own interests. And 62 percent said that it was no longer enough for corporations to give money to good causes; they needed to integrate those causes into their businesses.

Edelman cites declining trust that the government can solve our social issues as one explanation for this call to businesses and individuals to step up. In its March/April brief, TrendWatching suggests that practicing Random Acts of Kindness is a winning strategy for businesses. While this may seem like the kind of thing only big corporations can afford, there are many small businesses taking advantage of this cultural shift to differentiate their businesses and make a difference in their communities. (We  just published a small-business guide to starting your own social venture.)

Laurie Loew started Give Realty two and a half years ago. She was coming out of a divorce and got into real estate by accident. It was during the recession, there was a slump in home sales — you may have heard! — and she was struggling with how to set herself apart from all of the other struggling real estate agents in Austin, Tex. “One half of my brain was feeling sorry for myself because my ex-husband and I were fighting over money, “ said Ms. Loew. “Then I realized how fortunate I was compared to a lot of women going through divorce. I came up with the idea of giving 25 percent of my commissions to the charity of my clients’ choice. I thought the worst thing that could happen is a bunch of other Realtors would copy my idea and a bunch more money would go to charity.”

As of today,  Ms. Loew has given more than $112,000 to 40 different nonprofits. Three out of four clients come to her specifically because of her business model. The surprise bonus, she said, is the quality of clients she attracts. “I’m surrounded by the best clients — the ones who want to make the world a better place,” she said. “They value my time, the mission of Give Realty, and they are very, very special people.” For some extra feel-good public relations, she arranges check presentations with the charities and her clients, and she posts the resulting photographs on her Web site.

Neil Goldman, chief executive of Hotels for Hope, which is also based in Austin, doesn’t think his travel agency would have experienced the growth it has if not for his social business model. In April 2010, inspired by the buy-a-pair, give-a-pair model of Tom’s Shoes, Mr. Goldman asked his hotel chain partners to donate $1 for every room night he booked, which Hotels for Hope promised to match. Mr. Goldman says the company was still able to save clients an average of 24 percent off hotel “rack” rates. And in its first year, it donated almost $25,000 to five national and international charities. “Charity is atonement, giving money back to redeem ourselves,” Mr. Goldman said with a smile. He noted that Hotels for Hope has doubled its staff and that it was much easier for him to recruit talented, motivated employees since adopting the social enterprise model.

Tyler Merrick started an ad agency in Dallas, but the father of three young girls longed to do something more meaningful. Mr. Merrick decided to invest all of his savings in something he called Project 7, an organization that tries to offer help in seven areas of need. Project 7 sells bottled water, gum, mints and coffee with the promise that “when you buy, they give.” Sales proceeds from the products are tied directly to nonprofit partners that teach, feed and house those in need.

Coupled with simple, appealing packaging, the model has gotten the products on the shelves of Whole Foods, Wal-Mart and Caribou Coffee. Not bad for a company competing side-by-side with Coke, Pepsi and other leading packaged-good giants — and truly impressive for a company of five people that’s been in business two and a half years.

“We were up against Kraft, Hershey’s and Mars for gum and mints,” Mr. Merrick said of meeting with Wal-Mart’s buyers. “Wal-Mart is the biggest seller of gum and mints in the world. Getting one product on their register is like hitting the lottery. Wal-Mart told us their average customer makes $30,000 a year and this $1.28 pack of our gum gives these customers an easy way to give back. They gave us three products at their register to launch at their West Coast stores, which Project 7 began shipping in February.” Initial sales reports, he said, had the company’s mints and gum 50 percent ahead of Wal-Mart’s goals — with no merchandise support.

From that initial Wal-Mart order, Project 7, which publishes an annual report of its impact on its Web site (PDF), was able to buy 100,000 meals for families struggling in Southern California and planted 80,000 avocado and mango trees in Haiti. At its two-and-a-half-year mark, Project 7 is projecting profitability, something that often takes well financed packaged-good businesses five years to achieve.

MP Mueller is the founder of Door Number 3, a boutique advertising agency in Austin, Tex. Follow Door Number 3 on Facebook.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=1500c780b50ba6fc9288a482d9d0d2b4

The Bay Citizen: Chronicle and Building Are Reflection of Economy

Square, a mobile payment firm headed by the Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, now has 100 employees packed into what used to be The Chronicle’s human resources department. It is thriving alongside a social entrepreneurship collective, a digital art gallery and other startups that signed leases over the past 18 months with Hearst, The Chronicle’s parent company and the building’s owner.

These success stories contrast starkly with the fortunes of the newspaper. After years of declining circulation and advertising revenue, San Francisco’s most influential paper is finding itself increasingly isolated in the building it has called home since 1924.

The Chronicle building’s continuing transformation is a dramatic example of how the San Francisco economy is changing — even under one roof. With The Chronicle literally shrinking, Hearst and its Cleveland-based developer, Forest City Enterprises, are embarking on a plan to turn a 4.5-acre block around the newspaper — including idled printing facilities — into a commercial and residential campus for innovation.

The developers envision replacing the parking lots and warehouses around the Chronicle building with buildings housing startups, all connected by spruced-up alleys and open-air plazas.

“A lot of people just assume it’s only one building, but we’re creating an ecosystem that lives and breathes art and entrepreneurship,” said Alexa Arena, the Forest City vice president who is leading the project. (Forest City was the development partner for the Manhattan headquarters of The New York Times Company.)

Charles A. Fracchia, president of the San Francisco Historical Society, said it was “ironic” that Hearst appeared to be giving over the Chronicle building to tech firms.

“This is about organic changes in urban life coupled with the fact of always-changing technology,” Mr. Fracchia said. “The utilization of that space for a dying newspaper, in their eyes, just doesn’t pencil out.”

The age of the building, its monolithic presence south of Market Street, and lingering sentimentality about The Chronicle could present obstacles to Forest City’s plans, according to some city officials. They said the company has privately told them it envisions building several office towers as tall as 400 feet, which could come under opposition from neighborhood groups.

Anticipating a long and politically tricky process, Forest City is quietly courting City Hall and local residents and assembling a powerhouse stable of architects, housing experts and lobbyists — even as The Chronicle’s remaining staff members ponder whether the paper will ultimately be evicted from its home.

Frank J. Vega, The Chronicle’s chairman and publisher, said in a statement that the newspaper and its Web site, SFGate.com, “will occupy the building at Fifth and Mission for the foreseeable future.”

Forest City hired a firm headed by two former chiefs of the Office of Economic and Workforce Development under Mayor Gavin Newsom to consult on the project. It also hired Charles E. Chase, president of San Francisco’s Historic Preservation Commission, to review the building’s historical preservation status.

The developer will have to submit the review to the San Francisco Planning Commission before making changes to the property. Mr. Chase said that because the Historic Preservation Commission is part of the planning commission, he intends to recuse himself from any decisions.

In recent weeks, city officials said Hearst and Forest City executives had brought a “road show” to City Hall to meet with officials, even though the project appears to be years from requiring city approval.

“Their ideas are innovative and very responsive to market needs,” said Jennifer E. Matz, the current director of the mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development. “I’m really interested in seeing how their plans develop.”

Whatever happens, it is clear the Chronicle building and its surrounding neighborhood are already changing dramatically.

On a recent afternoon, a young woman in a bright teal skirt walked gingerly across the Hub, a shared work space for startups on the first floor of the Chronicle building, holding a cup of coffee while reading from a MacBook Air that was perched precariously on her forearm.

gshih@baycitizen.org

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=fbe6ce4c1e9c48fb97a3560d03f3a722