The three officials include Nobuaki Terasaka, the head of the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, the nation’s main nuclear regulatory body. The agency has been criticized for allowing inadequate safety measures at the Fukushima plant, including insufficient defenses against the towering tsunami unleashed by Japan’s deadly March 11 earthquake and tsunami.
The agency, which is part of the Ministry of Trade and Industry, has also been accused of trying to manipulate public opinion by planting people at recent town hall-style meetings to speak in support of nuclear power.
The other two officials are Kazuo Matsunaga, the top bureaucrat at the ministry, and Tetsuhiro Hosono, head of the ministry’s energy resources bureau, which promotes the power industry.
Thursday’s announcement comes nearly five months after a magnitude-9.0 earthquake and massive tsunami left more than 20,000 dead or missing in Northern Japan. The twin disasters also damaged the Fukushima nuclear plant and spurred radiation leaks, the worst since the 1986 nuclear disaster in Chernobyl.
The sacking of the three officials is a highly unusual move in Japan, where elite career bureaucrats taken from the top universities have long been the nation’s de facto rulers. However, Mr. Kan has begun taking aim at collusion between government and the power industry in what many here see as a belated effort to prolong his stay in office.
The embattled prime minister had promised to step down in the face of intense criticism from within his own Democratic Party of the government’s slow and seemingly haphazard response to the nuclear disaster. But he has since appeared to backtrack, refusing to say when he will actually leave office.
Now, he appears to be trying to revive his fortunes by deflecting such criticism onto the bureaucracy. He has also tried to tap the public’s deep misgivings about nuclear power by calling for reducing reliance on nuclear power in favor of solar and other new energy sources.
In part, Mr. Kan appears to be betting on his reputation as a crusader against inept and corrupt bureaucracy, which he earned as health minister in the 1990s by disclosing how his ministry and industry tried to cover up use of HIV-tainted blood. On Sunday, he made his harshest remarks yet about industry-government collusion in the nuclear industry, saying it was “exactly the same as the structure in pharmaceutical AIDS that I found as health minister.”
However, Mr. Kan’s continuing lack of popularity, and the critical tone of coverage in the local press, suggest that his efforts may be too little, too late. On Thursday, the Asahi Shimbun, one of Japan’s largest dailies, warned that the removal of the three officials could backfire by causing more confusion and paralysis in the nation’s energy policy.
Still, Mr. Kan appears intent on moving forward with what is increasingly appearing to be a sweeping overhaul of Japanese nuclear oversight.
Besides the officials’ removal, the Kan government has also said it is considering a plan to separate the nuclear regulatory agency from the trade ministry, which is also in charge of promoting the power industry, and relocate it in the environmental ministry. The plan also calls for raising the regulatory body’s status to that of a full-fledged government agency, giving it greater power to regulate the industry.
There are also signs of further changes to come at the trade ministry, one of the most powerful of Japan’s central ministries. In announcing the removal of the three officials on Thursday, the trade minister, Banri Kaieda, called for “rebuilding” the ministry.
“I’m planning to breathe fresh air into the ministry with a large-scale reshuffle” of personnel, Mr. Kaieda told reporters.
Mr. Kaieda has also promised to step down at an unspecified future time following clashes with Mr. Kan over the handling of the nuclear crisis. However, Mr. Kaieda has emerged as a point man in Mr. Kan’s recent moves to reform the bureaucracy, in what commentators here have said may be an effort by Mr. Kaieda to position himself as a possible successor to Mr. Kan as prime minister.
Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/05/world/asia/05japan.html?partner=rss&emc=rss