April 25, 2024

Mortgages: The Benefits of Prepurchase Mortgage Counseling

A new study from NeighborWorks America, a community development agency, links buyer counseling to significantly lower default rates.

In an evaluation of 75,000 mortgages originated from 2007 to 2009, NeighborWorks determined that borrowers who went through its prepurchase counseling program were nearly a third less likely than noncounseled borrowers to fall behind in payments 90 days or more in the first two years after closing.

The reduction in delinquencies was the same for both first-time and repeat buyers.

The findings send a message to lenders and investors, said Eileen Fitzgerald, the agency’s chief executive: “Before you kind of tie somebody into a loan, you should be encouraging them to go to prepurchase education and counseling. You will make more money off of that person.”

Previous studies of buyer counseling programs have reached varying conclusions. The NeighborWorks study, though not “bulletproof,” used a broader sample and a more rigorous control group than some earlier studies, said Chris Herbert, the research director for the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University.

He said none of the studies had been able to control for the possibility that buyers who seek counseling on their own might have personal characteristics that make them less likely to default. The NeighborWorks study tried to minimize this bias by drawing from the data of the credit-rating agency Experian to select a comparison group with credit practices similar to those of the counseled buyers.

NeighborWorks provides home-buyer education and counseling through a national network of roughly 240 nonprofit groups. Clients, typically low- and moderate-income families, pay a small fee.

The program helps potential buyers figure out what they can really afford, “beyond what a Realtor or banker would say,” after factoring in day care, transportation and other significant costs, Ms. Fitzgerald said. It also stresses the need for caution after a purchase, when credit-card offers can create the temptation to splurge on furniture and other household items.

“It really does make a difference if you take a little time to get the information and work through your own budget before you buy a home,” Ms. Fitzgerald said.

But the NeighborWorks findings, while interesting, shouldn’t be interpreted as conclusive evidence that all housing counseling works, said David Stevens, the chief executive of the Mortgage Bankers Association and a former Federal Housing Administration commissioner.

Counseling programs differ in how they are delivered. “The one thing we have yet to see is what’s the model that works,” Mr. Stevens said. “My own subjective view is that face-to-face is probably the best.”

The NeighborWorks model uses group education and individual counseling.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development is the primary source for funding for housing counseling. In recent years, most of these funds have been spent on people in foreclosure.

A recent report from the Bipartisan Policy Center argues for continued federal appropriations for counseling to improve borrowers’ access to “affordable, prudent” mortgage loans. The report also calls for lenders and regulators to provide incentives for borrowers who have weaker credit to go through counseling programs.

Mr. Stevens described counseling as “critical as we go forward.” Good programs can benefit the lending industry by reducing the level of support needed from professionals during the mortgage process, he said, and by improving efficiency.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/realestate/the-benefits-of-prepurchase-mortgage-counseling.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Economix Blog: Americans Got Much Poorer Last Quarter

Americans got much poorer last quarter, as their collective household net worth suffered the biggest decline in three years.

The total net worth of American households and nonprofit groups fell by $2.4 trillion in the third quarter of this year, according to a new report from the Federal Reserve. That was a decline of 4.1 percent compared with the second quarter.

DESCRIPTIONSource: Federal Reserve, via Haver Analytics

Wealth declined primarily because the financial markets did poorly. Americans saw big drops in the value of their assets like corporate equities (stocks), corporate and foreign bonds, mutual fund shares and pension fund reserves.

Household real estate assets also suffered, falling in value by $98.3 billion (0.6 percent) from the previous quarter, in nonseasonally-adjusted terms.

Partially offsetting the decline in assets was a smaller decline in household liabilities as families continued to cut back on debt, with the decline in mortgage debt more than offsetting the increase in consumer credit.

Don’t break out the Champagne just yet, though. Total debt for the United States — that is, also including corporate and government debt — hit another all-time high because government borrowing is still outpacing the rate at which households shed debt.

Guess who will ultimately pay back that government debt: American households.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=fadbdd01264aa8046973521994484d27

California Scrutinizes Nonprofits, Sometimes Ending a Tax Exemption

A growing number of nonprofit groups in California are being denied exemption from property taxes because the state’s chief tax collector and assessors contend they do not do enough to benefit state residents, according to lawyers representing the groups.

“I have a client who applied for the exemption recently and has been denied on the basis that it would not be doing enough to benefit the citizens of California,” said Ofer Lion, a lawyer. Mr. Lion would not name his client, but said it was new charity with “a global outlook in its mission.”

“They purchased a building in California because they relied on being able to qualify for property tax exemption,” he said. “If it has to pay the tax, it’s not going to go under, but less money will, of course, be available for its mission.”

No one knows how many nonprofit groups in California have been affected or why the issue has become contentious now, but the state’s budget woes have been mentioned as a likely motive. “It probably has something to do with the economy,” said Stephanie L. Petit, who has clients dealing with the process. “I think regulators are starting to look more closely at organizations that have the property tax exemption.”

State and local governments have been taking a hard look at nonprofits and the various tax exemptions they receive for the last couple of years, as tax revenues have fallen and the demand for public services has risen.

Last year, Hawaii tried — and failed — to impose a 1 percent tax on nonprofit groups. Boston has asked nonprofits to pay the city what is essentially a discounted property tax, and Chicago plans to ask nonprofits to start paying water and sewer fees.

Not surprisingly, such plans run into stiff opposition from nonprofit groups and their political supporters. But in California, the rules on the property tax exemption for nonprofits evolved out of a 1944 ballot initiative, so they are more grounded than in many other places — if not necessarily applied assiduously by county assessors.

The state has a two-tiered system, in which nonprofits first apply to the Board of Equalization, which collects state-mandated fees, sales and sin taxes and certifies exemption eligibility.

But assessors in each of the state’s 58 counties make the final decision on exemptions, after determining whether that property is used in a way that is of “primary benefit” to California.

The meaning of “primary,” however, is widely interpreted. “Although there has to be a primary benefit in California or to Californians, the way we look at primary is not a straight 50 percent test,” said Anita Gore, spokeswoman for the Board of Equalization. “Some activities and things nonprofit organizations do can’t be quantified in that sort of easy way.”

In Los Angeles County, for example, two properties owned by World Vision International, a Christian relief and development organization whose work is largely done overseas, are exempt from property taxes.

Similarly, Direct Relief International, which supplies medical supplies, drugs and equipment to countries around the world, does not pay property taxes on the office building and warehouse it owns in Santa Barbara. “In the current environment, I can imagine why local assessors would be looking for revenue and scrutinizing all the organizations exempted from local property taxes to see if they’ve complied with all the requirements and basically met their end of the policy bargain,” Thomas Tighe, chief executive of Direct Relief, said in an e-mail.

In San Mateo County, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation has had a property tax exemption for decades, said Terry Flinn, special assistant to the county assessor.

So far this year, the Hewlett foundation has granted $14.2 million, or about 27 percent of its total gifts of roughly $52 million, to groups working in California. The rest went out of state and around the globe.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=19ca5f5f29d794cd7088cf99f918800e