April 19, 2024

Economix: 5 Questions About Friday’s Jobs Report

A job fair this week in Phoenix for positions at a grocery chain.Ross D. Franklin/Associated PressA job fair this week in Phoenix for positions at a grocery chain.

Below, we pose five questions to ask about Friday’s jobs report, much as we did a month ago. The big picture is that job growth has been picking up in recent months — but the job market is still a long way from being healthy, and the last month or so has offered new reason for concern.

The Labor Department will release the report at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time.

Our five questions:

1. Has the recent economic slowdown led to a slowdown in job growth?

The first quarter of this year had the strongest job growth since before the recession began, in late 2007. But that job growth came on the heels of accelerating economic growth in late 2010. The economy has slowed markedly in early 2011.

Ben S. Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman, and many private forecasters say they think the economic slowdown was mostly a blip. Do employers agree? Or have they cut back on hiring and potentially increased layoffs?

As a point of reference, the most recent Labor Department numbers show that economy added 216,000 jobs in March and an average of 159,000 over the past three months.

2. Has the crisis in Japan affected employment in this country?

This will be the first jobs report that will include the effects of the Japanese tsunami (because the survey period is the week that includes the 12th day of the previous month, and the tsunami occurred on March 11). One place to look for effects: the automobile industry, which has been hurt by a shortage of parts from Japanese factories.

Employment in the manufacturing subcategory known as Motor Vehicles and Parts has been growing recently, by an average of almost 4,000 jobs a month over the last six months, to 697,000. What happened in April?

3. Are the cutbacks by local and state governments becoming more severe — or perhaps less so?

They are major employers, with 19.3 million workers. But facing deficits, they have been laying off workers and hampering the recovery. Over the last year, they have cut an average of 24,000 workers a month (and at a fairly steadily pace over the year).

4. What does the length of the work week say about business executives’ state of mind?

Companies often increase existing workers’ hours shortly before they start hiring large numbers of new workers. That hasn’t happened much this year. The average work week in the private sector was 34.3 hours in March, up from 34.2 hours late last year.

An increase would be a sign that employers — like stock-market investors — do not seem scared by the recent slowdown in economic growth. A lengthening work week would also help increase workers’ paychecks at a time when hourly wage growth has been weak.

5. Do the statistical details in the report offer reason for optimism?

The Labor Department won’t be releasing only numbers for April on Friday. It will also be revising its estimates of job growth in February and March. Current estimates show employment gains of 194,000 for February and 216,000 for March. An increase in those numbers would suggest that the government’s surveys of employers are having a hard time keeping pace with new hiring — a common occurrence during a recovery.

Likewise, the government’s survey of households will also be worth watching. In recoveries, it often shows bigger job gains than the survey of employers. And it usually ends up being more accurate, partly because the employer survey misses the jobs created by start-up firms. From January to March, the household survey showed an average employment gain of 219,000 jobs, compared with 159,000 for the employer survey.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d285df7740091bbbee42ec61d04d60fc

DealBook: Goldman Sachs Brushes Off the Gadfly

Evelyn Y. Davis at the Ford Motor Company's annual meeting last year.William Thomas Cain/Getty ImagesEvelyn Y. Davis at the Ford Motor Company’s annual meeting last year.

Lloyd C. Blankfein has his share of critics, but perhaps none are more vocal than Evelyn Y. Davis, an outspoken gadfly with a long history of haranguing corporate executives at annual meetings.

It turns out that Ms. Davis may have a new reason to dislike Mr. Blankfein: Goldman Sachs canceled its $7,200 subscription to her annual newsletter, Highlights and Lowlights, according to a person briefed on the matter but who was not authorized to speak on the record.

Highlights and Lowlights includes many snapshots of Ms. Davis glad-handing chief executives and her take on corporate governance.

Ms. Davis, however, said Wednesday that while she was not a fan of Mr. Blankfein, she was not aware that Goldman had canceled its subscription.

“I don’t keep up with that,” she said. “I am a multi-multimillionaire, and I don’t need anyone’s subscription.”

Ms. Davis and Mr. Blankfein are expected to face off on Friday when Goldman shareholders meet for the firm’s annual meeting.

Ms. Davis, who lives in Washington, charges $600 an issue for Highlights and Lowlights. Subscribers are required to buy at least two copies, she said. Ms. Davis gives away her newsletter at annual meetings.

Executives at several banks contacted by DealBook say that Ms. Davis encourages banks to buy numerous copies and that most banks pay $5,000 and more a year for the newsletter.

When one executive was asked why his bank subscribed to the newsletter, he said it was a move to shut her up.

Depending on your view, Ms. Davis, 81, is either a positive force for corporate change or a professional harasser of executives. She tends to hijack annual meetings, interrupting executives’ speeches to push her own agenda. She employs various techniques to grab attention, including loud outbursts and rushing to stage to hug chief executives. She calls herself the “Queen of the Corporate Jungle.”

The newsletter is part vanity play, chock full of grinning pictures of Ms. Davis with corporate chiefs.

It includes a letters to the editor section. One letter states: “Dear Evelyn: We missed YOU at OUR annual meeting.” It is signed “SEVERAL CEO’S!!!”.

Parts of the newsletter are written in capital letters. Ms. Davis is also a big fan of the exclamation mark. “The euro could very easily go back to par with the dollar and even go lower!!!,” she wrote in her latest issue.

She is no fan of Goldman or Mr. Blankfein, but that wasn’t always the case. In 2003 she gave Henry M. Paulson Jr., then the chief executive, a hug on stage when he told shareholders about his plans to travel to Shanghai despite concerns about the SARS virus spreading through parts of Asia.

But the relationship has soured over the years. At Goldman’s 2009 annual meeting, she criticized a board member, Stephen Friedman, who resigned as chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York after a controversy erupted over his purchase of some Goldman shares. In a long diatribe, Ms. Davis called Mr. Friedman a “disgrace.” Mr. Blankfein called Ms. Davis’s attack “beyond the pale.” After this outburst, the firm did not renew its subscription.

At the meeting in 2010, she called for Mr. Blankfein’s resignation. This year’s issue of her newsletter has a page dedicated to Goldman Sachs. She refers to Mr. Blankfein as ‘Lord Goldmine.”

In an interview, she said she planned to again ask Mr. Blankfein to resign this Friday. “Every day there is a new scandal there,” she said.

Ms. Davis said she was also upset with the Wall Street firm because when she once asked to deposit some of her fortune at the firm, she was told she could not because she was not a client. “I like to spread my wealth around,” she said.

A Goldman spokesman declined to comment.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=bb861c50c9883f8b231d56c5c966a47d