April 19, 2024

DealBook: Citigroup’s Earnings Rose 30% in First Quarter

A Citibank branch in New York.Keith Bedford/ReutersA Citibank branch in New York.

2:20 p.m. | Updated

Citigroup on Monday reported first-quarter profit of $3.8 billion, or $1.23 a share, exceeding analysts’ estimates, as the bank continued to reduce costs and unload troubled assets.

The bank also reported higher revenue of $20.5 billion, buoyed by continued gains in its investment banking business.

Related Links



In the lead up to the release of bank’s quarterly earnings, analysts had estimated the bank would post earnings of $1.18 a share on revenue of $20.17 billion, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters. Adjusted for certain charges, the company reported a profit of $4 billion on revenue of $20.8 billion in the first quarter. Citigroup’s stock rose more than 1 percent, to $45.32 by mid-afternoon, on a day when there was a widespread sell-off of stocks.

“Achieving consistent, high-quality earnings is one of my top priorities and these results are encouraging,” Michael L. Corbat, the bank’s chief executive, said in a statement. “During the quarter, we benefited from seasonally strong results in our markets businesses, sustained momentum in investment banking, continued year-over-year growth in loans and deposits in Citicorp, and a more favorable credit environment.”

The results come after a particularly disappointing fourth quarter for Citigroup, when profits were hampered by mortgage woes stemming from the financial crisis. Last quarter, for example, Citigroup had $1.3 billion in legal costs and related expenses.

Citigroup has been aggressively whittling down a morass of soured loans and cutting less-profitable business lines in an effort to reduce costs. In December, it said it would eliminate 11,000 jobs worldwide. Within its Citi Holdings unit, Citigroup continues to unwind a glut of soured assets. The assets in that unit were down by $60 billion in the first quarter.

Like its rivals JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo, Citigroup said revenue growth slackened in the first quarter. Citigroup faces increasing pressure to cut costs and bolster shareholder returns.

Mr. Corbat addressed the continued difficulty in the banking industry as the economy limped toward a recovery, saying in a statement that “the environment remains challenging and we are sure to be tested as we go through the year.”

The earnings on Monday pointed to a broad skittishness among consumers to take on fresh debt.

“I don’t think we have a real confident consumer driving the economy,” John C. Gerspach, the bank’s chief financial officer, said on a call on Monday. “I still think we are seeing a certain amount of deleveraging.”

Citigroup has been trying to capitalize on its vast international footprint and to focus on developing countries that offer more opportunities for growth than the United States. In North America, revenue fell to $5.1 billion from $5.2 billion in the period a year earlier. The decline stems in part from a persistent caution among Americans to take on additional loans.

Despite sluggishness in North America, Citigroup reported revenue growth of 4 percent in Latin America. Net income within Latin America rose 5 percent, to $412 million, in the first quarter, while net income in the global consumer banking group fell 11 percent, to $1.95 billion.

Citigroup is also grappling with a continually shifting regulatory landscape in Asia. In South Korea, for example, national officials placed a cap on the interest rates of a range of consumer loans. Mr. Gerspach noted that there were “still headwinds” in the region.

Beneath the headline numbers, Citigroup experienced gains in some of its businesses, and deposits grew 3 percent, to $934 billion. Total loans also rose 5 percent, to $539 billion.

Still, Citigroup, like other banks, struck an optimistic tone about consumers’ ability to pay their bills on time. Delinquencies have fallen, Mr. Gerspach said. “All the improvements we have been seeing not only carried over into the first quarter, but improved,” he said.

Another bright spot in the first quarter was the securities and banking group, which was bolstered by strong gains in investment banking, fixed income and equities. Revenue surged 31 percent, to $6.98 billion, while net income was $2.3 billion, up 81 percent from the period a year earlier. For Citigroup, the unit has been a consistent focus. Mr. Gerspach reiterated that on Monday, saying the bank continued to make “steady progress” in its share of a “client’s wallet.”

Much of the gains in securities and banking came from Citigroup’s investment banking unit, which was buoyed by increases in debt and equity underwriting. The unit’s revenue increased to $1.1 billion, up 22 percent from the period a year earlier.

The quarterly report is the second under the leadership of Mr. Corbat, who took over after the abrupt ouster of Vikram S. Pandit. In October, Michael E. O’Neill, the bank’s forceful chairman, pushed Mr. Pandit out in favor of Mr. Corbat.

Since taking over, Mr. Corbat has vowed to continue reorienting the bank toward its core business while shedding less-profitable units. Mr. Corbat has said he is willing to eliminate operations across the globe.

Citigroup continues to be haunted by its mortgage woes. Last month, it agreed to pay $730 million settle claims that it duped investors into buying securities backed by shaky mortgage loans. The bank did not admit any wrongdoing. Cautioning investors on Monday, Mr. Gerspach said that legal expenses remained “volatile.”


This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: April 15, 2013

An earlier version of this article misstated Citigroup’s revenue performance in North America. Revenue fell to $5.1 billion from the period a year earlier, it didn’t increase.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/citigroups-earnings-rose-30-in-first-quarter/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Citigroup’s Earnings Rose 30% in 1st Quarter

A Citibank branch in New York.Keith Bedford/ReutersA Citibank branch in New York.

9:50 a.m. | Updated

Citigroup on Monday reported first-quarter profit of $3.8 billion, or $1.23 a share, exceeding analysts’ estimates, as the bank continued to reduce costs and unload troubled assets.

The bank also reported higher revenue of $20.5 billion, buoyed by continued gains in its investment banking business.

Related Links



In the lead up to the release of bank’s quarterly earnings, analysts had estimated the bank would post earnings of $1.18 a share on revenue of $20.17 billion, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters. Adjusted for certain charges, the company reported a profit of $4 billion on revenue of $20.8 billion in the first quarter. Citigroup’s stock rose more than 2 percent, to $45.87, in early morning trading.

“Achieving consistent, high-quality earnings is one of my top priorities and these results are encouraging,” Michael L. Corbat, the bank’s chief executive, said in a statement. “During the quarter, we benefited from seasonally strong results in our markets businesses, sustained momentum in investment banking, continued year-over-year growth in loans and deposits in Citicorp, and a more favorable credit environment.”

The results come after a particularly disappointing fourth quarter for Citigroup, when profits were hampered by mortgage woes stemming from the financial crisis. Last quarter, for example, Citigroup had $1.3 billion in legal costs and related expenses.

Citigroup has been aggressively whittling down a morass of soured loans and cutting less-profitable business lines in an effort to reduce costs. In December, it said it would eliminate 11,000 jobs worldwide. Within its Citi Holdings unit, Citigroup continues to unwind a glut of soured assets. The assets in that unit were down by $60 billion in the first quarter.

Like its rivals JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo, Citigroup said revenue growth slackened in the first quarter. Citigroup faces increasing pressure to cut costs and bolster shareholder returns.

Mr. Corbat addressed the continued difficulty in the banking industry as the economy limped toward a recovery, saying in a statement that “the environment remains challenging and we are sure to be tested as we go through the year.”

The earnings on Monday pointed to a broad skittishness among consumers to take on fresh debt.

“I don’t think we have a real confident consumer driving the economy,” John C. Gerspach, the bank’s chief financial officer, said on a call on Monday. “I still think we are seeing a certain amount of deleveraging.”

Citigroup has been trying to capitalize on its vast international footprint and to focus on developing countries that offer more opportunities for growth than the United States. In North America, revenue fell to $5.1 billion from $5.2 billion in the period a year earlier. The decline stems in part from a persistent caution among Americans to take on additional loans.

Despite sluggishness in North America, Citigroup reported revenue growth of 4 percent in Latin America. Net income within Latin America rose 5 percent, to $412 million, in the first quarter, while net income in the global consumer banking group fell 11 percent, to $1.95 billion.

Citigroup is also grappling with a continually shifting regulatory landscape in Asia. In South Korea, for example, national officials placed a cap on the interest rates of a range of consumer loans. Mr. Gerspach noted that there were “still headwinds” in the region.

Beneath the headline numbers, Citigroup experienced gains in some of its businesses, and deposits grew 3 percent, to $934 billion. Total loans also rose 5 percent, to $539 billion.

Still, Citigroup, like other banks, struck an optimistic tone about consumers’ ability to pay their bills on time. Delinquencies have fallen, Mr. Gerspach said. “All the improvements we have been seeing not only carried over into the first quarter, but improved,” he said.

Another bright spot in the first quarter was the securities and banking group, which was bolstered by strong gains in investment banking, fixed income and equities. Revenue surged 31 percent, to $6.98 billion, while net income was $2.3 billion, up 81 percent from the period a year earlier. For Citigroup, the unit has been a consistent focus. Mr. Gerspach reiterated that on Monday, saying the bank continued to make “steady progress” in its share of a “client’s wallet.”

Much of the gains in securities and banking came from Citigroup’s investment banking unit, which was buoyed by increases in debt and equity underwriting. The unit’s revenue increased to $1.1 billion, up 22 percent from the period a year earlier.

The quarterly report is the second under the leadership of Mr. Corbat, who took over after the abrupt ouster of Vikram S. Pandit. In October, Michael E. O’Neill, the bank’s forceful chairman, pushed Mr. Pandit out in favor of Mr. Corbat.

Since taking over, Mr. Corbat has vowed to continue reorienting the bank toward its core business while shedding less-profitable units. Mr. Corbat has said he is willing to eliminate operations across the globe.

Citigroup continues to be haunted by its mortgage woes. Last month, it agreed to pay $730 million settle claims that it duped investors into buying securities backed by shaky mortgage loans. The bank did not admit any wrongdoing. Cautioning investors on Monday, Mr. Gerspach said that legal expenses remained “volatile.”


This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: April 15, 2013

An earlier version of this article misstated Citigroup’s revenue performance in North America. Revenue fell to $5.1 billion from the period a year earlier, it didn’t increase.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/citigroups-earnings-rose-30-in-first-quarter/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bank of America to Set Aside $14 Billion in Mortgage Deal

The whopping charge represents the banking industry’s biggest single settlement tied to the subprime mortgage boom and the subsequent financial crisis of 2008.

Of the $14 billion, $8.5 billion will go to help settle claims by heavyweight holders of the securities, including Pimco, BlackRock and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, that have been pressing for a settlement since last fall.

The losses stem largely from mortgages underwritten by Countrywide Financial, the subprime mortgage lender that Bank of America bought in 2008.

“This is another important step we are taking in the interest of our shareholders to minimize the impact of future economic uncertainty and put legacy issues behind us,” Brian T. Moynihan, the bank’s chief executive, said in a statement. “We will continue to act aggressively, and in the best interest of our shareholders, to clean up the mortgage issues largely stemming from our purchase of Countrywide.”

In early trading, Bank of America shares rose roughly 3 percent, a sign that investors hope this deal will lift a cloud that has been hanging over the stock since last year. The bank’s mortgage woes have been considered a main reason why it has underperformed giant peers like JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup.

In addition to the $14 billion hit, the bank is taking additional charges totaling $6.4 billion in the second quarter to clean up other areas of its troubled mortgage business. That includes the $2.6 billion noncash write-off of the value of its home lending business, a move that tacitly acknowledges that it overpaid for Countrywide.

The deal will also require Bank of America, based in Charlotte, N.C., to improve its payment collection process by hiring specialists to focus on high-risk loans and to do a better job of tracking whether the bank is adhering to its own internal loan-servicing standards. 

The negotiations toward a settlement began last fall but picked up speed in recent weeks as the end of the second quarter approached. For the investors, settling avoids a costly, multiyear legal fight, while Bank of America can pile a load of its troubles into the second-quarter results and clear away one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the company.

Last fall, Mr. Moynihan promised “hand-to-hand” combat to fight these and other legal efforts by investors to force Bank of America to make payouts for soured mortgage securities.

But he told analysts on a conference call Wednesday morning that the settlement did not mark a forced surrender. “We did fight for the last several months,” he said. “But when you look at this over all, it’s a better decision for the company. It was much more adverse to the company if we kept fighting. We’ve been battling it out.”

“It is our job, management’s job, to eliminate risk,” he added. “There is still work ahead of us on the mortgage issues but this is a major step forward for the company.”

Despite the staggering size of the settlement with the investors and other charges announced Wednesday, additional liability remains from mortgage securities that were assembled and sold by Bank of America.

Bruce Thompson, the company’s chief financial officer, said the agreement does not cover loans sold by Bank of America to other private trusts, nor does it cover mortgage securities assembled from the home loans of third parties.

He added that sales and trading in the company’s vast Wall Street business is ahead of last year but remains “below the seasonally strong first quarter.” The quarter’s results include $2.5 billion in gains from the sale of assets including the company’s Balboa insurance subsidiary and a stake that it sold in BlackRock.

Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo have the greatest exposure to legal claims that they bundled troubled home loans and sold them as sound investments. Together, they are likely to absorb roughly 40 percent of the industry’s mortgage-related losses.

In a recent research note, Paul Miller of FBR Capital Markets projected that Bank of America could face a total of $25 billion of losses from the soured mortgages, the most of any of the major banks.

Other big banks face sizable risks, too. Mr. Miller predicted that Chase could expect losses reaching as much as $11.2 billion. Wells Fargo has potential losses of up to $5.2 billion, while Citigroup could see losses top $3.3 billion.

The Bank of America settlement will require court approval in New York.

Under the terms of the accord, Bank of America would deliver the money to the trustee for the securities, Bank of New York Mellon, which would distribute it to the institutional investors.

The bank does not anticipate having to raise capital or sell stock to find the money for the settlement.

Still, other huge risks loom from the fallout of the subprime mortgage crisis. All 50 state attorneys general are in the final stages of settling an investigation into abuses by the biggest mortgage servicers, and are pressing the big banks to pay up to $30 billion in fines and penalties.

What’s more, insurance companies that backed many of the soured mortgage-backed securities are also pressing for reimbursement, arguing that the original mortgages were underwritten with false information and did not conform to normal standards.

In an interview on Tuesday, before reports of the Bank of America settlement, Sheila C. Bair, the chairwoman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, worried that the unresolved mortgage claims continued to hurt the broader economy.

“Unresolved legal claims could serve as a drag on the recovery of the housing market,” Ms. Bair said. “The healing of the housing market is essential to the recovery of the broader economy.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=191b3cb0fc65f09932a69666c8bf44e9