April 20, 2024

Its Viewers Are Graying, but Their Passion Pays for Fox News

Fox News continues to be near the top in cable television in terms of the number of viewers it attracts, but it is near the top in another category, too: the median age of its audience is among the oldest in television.

For most of the television business — the segment that relies on advertising — that would be serious cause for concern because ad sales are almost always based on a target age of 25 to 54, and Fox News, for the last two years, has had a median age of 65-plus in its ratings both for the full day and for prime time.

But up until now at least, Fox News has been more able than any other television entity to defy the tyranny of the demos, as they are known in the business. And the network, which has upturned traditions and expectations throughout its history, has earned consistently enormous profits, relying on the commitment and loyalty of its audience.

“I don’t think you can fully capture the value Fox News brings by looking at the Nielsen ratings alone,” said Craig Moffett, the longtime financial analyst who specializes in cable. Mr. Moffett, who heads his own firm, said that the key to Fox News’s continued financial strength has been “the level of passion and engagement” it inspires in its viewers.

That translates into big money because cable systems now pay Fox News one of the highest per-subscriber fees in television, 94 cents a month, topped in cable television only by a few networks, most of which have expensive sports rights to pay. (By comparison, CNN gets 57 cents a subscriber, according to SNL Kagan Research.) As Mr. Moffett put it, “There are a handful of networks consumers are deeply passionate about out of all proportion to Nielsen ratings, and distributors know if you don’t have those networks, then woe be to you.”

With close to 100 million subscribers in total, Kagan estimated Fox News will take in $1.11 billion this year from subscription fees before it ever sells a single commercial. Still, the network faces some significant questions as it goes forward: How old is too old? And when does the issue have to be addressed?

Fox News declined to make executives available for comment, but several recent signs — including changing personalities for some of its weekday programs — suggest the network may have decided the time has come to confront the issue of age.

Just how old is its audience? It is impossible to be precise because Nielsen stops giving an exact figure for median age once it passes 65. But for six of the last eight years, Fox News has had a median age of 65-plus and the number of viewers in the 25-54 year old group has been falling consistently, down five years in a row in prime time, from an average of 557,000 viewers five years ago to 379,000 this year. That has occurred even though Fox’s overall audience in prime time is up this year, to 2.02 million from 1.89 million three years ago.

The network also has been faced with a recent string of nightly wins in that 25-54 audience by CNN, which had been hopelessly behind in recent years.

“The numbers indicate they haven’t been replacing the younger viewers,” Mr. Moffet said of Fox News. Many of the loyal viewers the network has always had are simply aging up beyond the 54-year cutoff for many ad buyers. The result is an audience edging consistently above that 65-plus number.

News audiences always trend old, and the viewers of Fox’s competitors are hardly in the full flower of youth. MSNBC’s median age for its prime-time shows this year is 60.6; CNN’s is 59.8.

In terms of the rest of television, Fox News also is quite a bit older than networks considered to have a base of older viewers. CBS has frequently been needled for having older viewers, but at 56.8, its median viewer is far younger than Fox News’s. (Viewers at Fox News’s sister network, Fox Broadcasting, have a median age of 50.2; at ABC, the median is 54.4; at NBC, it’s 47.7.)

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/23/business/its-viewers-are-graying-but-their-passion-pays-for-fox-news.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

After Rough Patch, ‘The Bachelor’ Wins Back Viewers

After several seasons in decline, “The Bachelor” has had a resurgence rare among network reality shows. The glossy dating show, which pairs one hunky (often shirtless) man with dozens of spray-tanned (often bikini-clad) women until he proposes to the ultimate survivor, has also become the unlikely exception in a television season when almost every other show on ABC and its competing networks has declined.

The audience for “The Bachelor” has increased by 3 percent this season to 8.8 million in total viewers and by 7 percent to 3.3 million viewers 18 to 49 years old, the group that attracts the most advertisers. The average audience for that group among ABC’s regularly scheduled shows is only 2.4 million viewers.

“It just takes the right gal or guy to all of a sudden regalvanize the audience,” said Mike Fleiss, the creator and an executive producer of the show.

But the show’s recent success has also been a result of a push by the producers to attract younger viewers, to use social media to promote “live” viewing and, by tinkering with the casting and format, to encourage viewers to return for subsequent seasons after the bloom is off the previous season’s rose.

So after 11 years on television and 17 separate rose-covered editions, “The Bachelor” is on the upswing. The show posts the best results in network television on Monday nights with younger women — those 18 to 34. The viewers’ median age is 51.1, young in broadcast television terms. ABC’s other hit reality series, “Dancing With the Stars,” which has featured former bachelors and bachelorettes, has an average viewer age of 61.6.

ABC emphasizes that the show, far from having the economically downscale profile of some reality shows, is especially strong with women of financial means. In homes with more than $100,000 in income, it scores 34 percent above the television average.

“It really plays right into that sweet spot of upscale women,” said John Saade, the executive vice president for alternative programs at ABC.

“The Bachelor” did not always look so promising. The series took an inevitable dive in ratings around its 12th season. Its abysmal record in relationships did not help. None of the final “rose ceremonies,” in which the bachelor gives his future fiancée a rose and a Neil Lane diamond engagement ring, had ended in marital bliss. (“The Bachelorette,” a spinoff, has resulted in two marriages.)

“The show was fading,” said Mr. Saade, who has worked in ABC’s reality department since before the premiere of “The Bachelor” in 2002.

The turning point, the producers say, came in the form of Jason Mesnick, the earnest divorced father who starred in season 13. He proposed in the finale only to change his mind and dump the ostensible female “winner” (on air) and end up married to Molly Malaney, the runner-up. Mr. Mesnick and Ms. Malaney are expecting their first child together any day now.

“I remember the moment when I let Molly go, and I was uncontrollably crying,” Mr. Mesnick said from his home in Seattle. “A producer said, ‘Are you sure you made the right call?’ ” (In “Bachelor” lingo crying over a balcony became known as “a Mesnick.”)

Mr. Mesnick, who had competed on “The Bachelorette,” represented a turning point for the franchise. Mr. Fleiss decided that rather than tapping a mystery man as the bachelor each season, the show should feature the fan favorites whose hearts had been broken on “The Bachelorette.” The continuing characters make the series — and the drama among the heavily made-up women who share a 7,590-square foot house in Agoura Hills, Calif., as they compete for Mr. Lowe’s attention — more like the traditional soap operas once on ABC’s daytime schedule.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/11/business/media/after-rough-patch-the-bachelor-wins-back-viewers.html?partner=rss&emc=rss