Southern Weekend has been a weather vane for restrictions on news organizations in China since its founding 29 years ago, and its journalists say their frustration with those constraints has been building for years, turning their relationship with provincial party officials into something of a cat-and-mouse battle.
The restrictions have tightened since last summer, leading to the protests that erupted at Southern Weekend’s offices last week over a rewritten New Year’s editorial, one of the sharpest outbreaks of friction so far.
The newspaper appeared on newsstands on Thursday, after protesting journalists accepted a compromise in which provincial propaganda officials promised to loosen some of the more intrusive censorship controls. The police in Guangzhou, the capital of Guangdong Province, moved to quell any new demonstrations at the offices of the Nanfang Media Group, which owns the paper.
The latest issue of Southern Weekend featured an investigation into a fire at an orphanage that left seven people dead, as well as discussions of proposed changes to labor-camp and farmland-seizure laws. It made no direct mention of the protests that turned the newspaper itself into the biggest story in China so far this year.
The protesting journalists directed their anger at Tuo Zhen, the head of party propaganda in Guangdong, whom they blamed for tampering with the editorial, changing it from an essay urging respect for constitutional rights into an error-marred paean to party rule. But the closest that anything in the latest issue came to touching on that controversy was a reprint of a commentary from People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s main national paper, on the role of the news media.
“Party control of the media is a principle, but the manner in which the party controls the media must keep up with the times,” Southern Weekend said in reference to the People’s Daily commentary.
Southern Weekend has been at the forefront of changes in China’s increasingly commercial news organizations. By reporting aggressively on scandals, corruption, popular protests and other delicate subjects, the newspaper and others like it have collided with party restrictions. Now Southern Weekend is at the heart of the next big test: whether the Communist Party’s new leader, Xi Jinping, intends to extend his promises of economic reform into a measure of political liberalization, including more scope for the news media to challenge officials.
“There was an accidental element to the Tuo Zhen incident, but it also erupted out of long-accumulated grievances over interference in reporting and editing,” said Zhang Ping, a former editor and columnist with the paper who was dismissed from the Nanfang Media Group under official pressure in 2011.
“For me, the most important thing about this incident is that it’s exposed the dark insides of the Propaganda Department,” Mr. Zhang said, speaking about the censorship uproar from Germany, where he now lives. “It’s almost impossible to appeal against the Propaganda Department. You couldn’t question their decisions.”
Much more was at stake than one botched editorial. Mr. Tuo, who took up his post last May, was the embodiment of increasingly meddlesome censorship, according to people who have worked for Southern Weekend and academics who have studied the newspaper.
“Tuo Zhen seemed to have no understanding that running a paper is a business,” said Yan Lieshan, a senior editor with the Nanfang Media Group. “Nowadays, most newspapers in China have to pay their own way and make a living, but when editors act like censors, they can throttle a paper to death.”
The journalists’ grievances go back years, including an incident in 2009 when propaganda and Foreign Ministry officials micromanaged publication of an interview with President Obama, Mr. Zhang and other former Southern Weekend journalists said. The White House reached out to Southern Weekend as a relatively liberal and sympathetic outlet, but censors took that as proof of the paper’s political unreliability. The version of the interview the paper ultimately published was bland and heavily cut.
Edward Wong reported from Guangzhou, and Chris Buckley from Hong Kong. Jonathan Ansfield and Shi Da contributed reporting from Beijing.
Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/11/world/asia/as-protest-ends-chinese-censorship-battle-remains.html?partner=rss&emc=rss