April 23, 2024

Special Report: Energy: In Uncertain Times, a Need for Stability

This year’s outlook has also been complicated by the tsunami in Japan and the ensuing Fukushima nuclear crisis. We don’t know what will happen to the share of nuclear power in the global energy mix. But it is clear that its future expansion is now in question.

In contrast to all this, last year’s energy map was rather uncomplicated. Toward the end of the year, the energy markets were relatively tranquil, the energy mix was expanding and the oil and gas industries faced promising scenarios.

This year, however, there is an entirely new world. Reading today’s energy map thus requires great care — and the understanding that it could change unexpectedly.

Widespread instability across the Middle East and Africa region has raised important questions about the long-term impact on upstream investments, oil and gas production and hydrocarbon exports in the region.

If the unrest continues, production and exports could continue to be affected. The temporary loss of Libya’s crude oil production, for example, put significant pressure on world oil markets. But other OPEC countries have been able to help stabilize the markets by increasing their production.

Responding to events like these — in order to ensure market balance — is precisely what the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries continually strives to do. It is why OPEC remains committed to maintaining spare capacity: to provide ample supply levels during times of constraint.

There has also been a significant shift in the global economic environment. This has brought new risks for the energy industry, in general, and for oil, in particular.

Just a few months ago, at the time of OPEC’s last ministerial meeting, the global economic outlook suggested growth, as well as an increase in oil demand and a modest rise in crude prices. At the time, OPEC was thinking that the market would need 1.5 million barrels per day in extra production. But ongoing problems in the world’s largest economies have required revisions to this outlook.

Despite generous stimulus packages, the recovery in the U.S. has not turned out as expected. Continuing unemployment — and the historic downgrading of America’s debt rating — have posed significant challenges to policy makers. And in the European Union, there is a sovereign debt crisis in some countries which now threatens the stability of the world’s financial system.

All this has prompted OPEC to revise its forecasts for world economic growth. In its September Monthly Oil Market Report, expectations for global growth were revised down to 3.6 percent from 3.7 percent in 2011, and to 3.9 percent from 4 percent in 2012.

On the other hand, developing countries seem to be growing rapidly and steadily. In fact, OPEC sees the majority of global G.D.P. growth in 2011 coming from developing countries.

China, in particular, continues to grow robustly, despite some manufacturing weakness. Recent OPEC figures put its G.D.P. growth at 9 percent or more in 2011 and 8.5 percent in 2012. This translates into a growing appetite for energy.

In fact, while the outlook for the global economy is uncertain, overall energy demand — and oil, in particular — is set to increase. OPEC sees global energy demand increasing around 50 percent from 2010 to 2035, even if significant efficiency gains are assumed. Fossil fuels will continue to play a central role.

Fossil fuels offer the best prospects for meeting the world’s energy needs. They offer distinct advantages over alternative energies, due to the relative affordability of their projects and existing infrastructure. Over the next 20 years, they are seen contributing more than 83 percent to the energy mix.

Additionally, even with oil’s share seen as falling to around 30 percent from 35 percent of the global energy mix by 2030, trends suggest that its overall share will remain very strong.

The supply outlook also indicates that there is more than enough to meet demand well into the future. Estimates suggest total world crude oil and natural gas liquids resources of around 3.5 trillion barrels: 1.4 trillion in non-OPEC countries and 2.1 trillion in OPEC ones.

Production in OPEC member countries is still strong, despite recent instability in some regions, and supply levels continue to provide significant forward cover. Currently, more than 40 percent of the world’s crude oil production comes from OPEC countries — and there is still enough collective spare capacity to address market needs.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/11/business/energy-environment/in-uncertain-times-a-need-for-stability.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Nervous Investors Chase Low-Risk Assets

Investors roared into Treasury bonds, cash and other low-risk assets on Thursday, acting on their fears about the weak global economic outlook on a day when stock markets in the United States declined more than 4 percent.

Just last week, the markets showed signs of nervousness about the government’s creditworthiness during a standoff over Washington’s debt limit. But on Thursday, yields on two-year Treasury notes touched 0.26 percent, the lowest ever, while the yield on the benchmark 10-year bond dropped 21 basis points to 2.41.

The low yields reflected a surging demand for Treasuries, which have long been considered almost as secure as cash. The 10-year rates approached depths not seen since October 2010, shortly before the Federal Reserve began to pump hundreds of billions of dollars into the economy amid fears of a slowdown.

Rates on even shorter-term credit, including six-month Treasury bills and overnight loans in the vast market for repurchase agreements, swung toward zero Thursday. Yields on one-month bills actually fell into negative territory before closing at zero.

Above all else, cash has become the investments of choice this week as the deepening economic and debt worries in the United States and Europe have made stocks look like a minefield to be avoided.

“The move to cash is symptomatic of a broader concern about growth and the stock market,” said Mike Ryan, chief investment strategist at UBS Wealth Management Americas. “It’s all part of a generic derisking exercise.”

Tom Forester, chief investment officer for the Forester Value Fund, based in Lake Forest, Ill., summed up the situation more succinctly. “Cash doesn’t go down,” he said.

Mr. Forester said he was shifting assets into a money-market fund that invests in Treasury notes. For other institutional investors, even money market funds seemed risky, and they instead sought the security of cash invested in commercial bank accounts.

The huge buildup in cash does not suggest that the world financial system is on the brink of another Lehman-like panic. But it does underscore the broader economic challenges facing both the United States and Europe, particularly the fear and uncertainty that has taken hold among companies, financial institutions and individuals.

Many companies are holding off on investing in new capacity and creating new jobs, instead stockpiling cash in case of another panic. And banks on both sides of the Atlantic are cautious about lending, restricting the money available to both businesses and consumers. Finally, individuals are clamping down on spending, too. Consumer spending in June dropped for the first time in nearly two years, according to government data announced earlier this week.

At the height of the uncertainty over whether the debt ceiling would be raised and with a potential default in the offing, in late July, investors pulled out more than $100 billion from money market funds and put much of it into banks, lifting fears that the funds could see a run that resembled the one after Lehman Brothers’ collapse in 2008.

Since the beginning of this year through July 20th, holdings of cash in United States commercial banks surged 85 percent, or $912.7 billion, to $1.98 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve.

In a sign of just how much cash had poured into commercial bank accounts, Bank of New York Mellon said on Thursday that it would charge institutional clients with more than $50 million on deposit a fee of 13 basis points. The move is intended to recover some of the cost of managing the money, but is also a bid to slow the so-called hot money that has been ricocheting between Treasuries, money-market funds and pure cash balances at the big banks.

The Bank of New York Mellon said the fee would only be applied “to a small number of institutional clients with extraordinarily high deposit levels where the deposits have increased significantly in recent weeks, well above market trends.” The bank did not disclose just how much cash had poured into its coffers recently.

Over all, banks took in nearly $200 billion between mid-June and mid-July as institutional investors fled money market accounts and sought the safety of accounts protected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, according to Joseph Abate, a money market strategist at Barclays Capital.

While its rivals have not yet announced similar moves, the Bank of New York’s charges are likely to force cash out of banks and back into money market funds and Treasuries, driving rates even lower where possible, Mr. Abate said in a note to investors Thursday.

“The movement into deposits during a financial crisis is expensive for U.S. banks because they have to pay deposit insurance on these extra inflows,” Mr. Abate wrote. “These inflows mostly represent ‘hot money.’ ”

There are signs that money market funds are beginning to regain some of their appeal now that the debt ceiling has been raised and as stocks swoon.

Amid the decline on Wall Street and approval of the debt ceiling increase this week, $13.1 billion went back into money market funds on Tuesday and Wednesday, said Peter Crane, the president of Crane Data, which tracks money market mutual fund flows. Data for Thursday was not in yet, but Mr. Crane said he expected this trend to continue in the coming days.

“Bad news for everyone else is good news for money market funds,” he said.

That is certainly why they appeal to Mr. Forester. He has been building up his cash position for weeks, he said, selling shares of past winners like I.B.M. and Honeywell.

The weak growth in gross domestic product in the first half of 2011, a figure released by the government last Friday, only confirmed his doubts, he said. Now, Mr. Forester’s cash position in his $210 million stock fund equals 22 percent of assets, about double the average since he started the fund 11 years ago.

“You do this ahead of time, you don’t do it when the world’s falling apart,” he said. “We’ve seen a lot of this coming.”

Julie Creswell contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=55ac77ea2810444dc47a19284fe789b5