April 19, 2024

Media Decoder Blog: The Breakfast Meeting: A Children’s App Breaks Ground for Viacom, and Essay on Royals Causes Uproar

The children’s channel Nickelodeon plans to release an iPad app Thursday that could have serious implications for its parent company, Viacom, Amy Chozick writes. It represents Viacom’s first attempt at a streaming app and could indicate how they will approach apps for channels like Comedy Central and MTV. The most interesting thing about the app is that Nickelodeon’s research indicated that 9- and 10-year-olds were more interested in associated content, like music videos, games and video clips, rather than watching full episodes on a tablet. So the app contains a lot of accessible content beyond streaming episodes of Nickelodeon favorites like “SpongeBob SquarePants” and “iCarly,” even for users who do not subscribe to a cable company that provides Nickelodeon.

The front page of Britain’s hell-raising tabloid The Daily Mail became the improbable site of literary discourse after Hilary Mantel, a celebrated historical novelist, wrote an article about the former Kate Middleton in The London Review of Books that the Mail called a “venomous attack.” Ms. Mantel was describing the 31-year-old Duchess of Cambridge based more on the idealized, objectified way she has been cast as part of the royal spectacle than who she may be as a person, John F. Burns explains. Nevertheless, the essay, which was written in an elegant but haughty style and referred to the duchess as “machine-made” and “a shop window mannequin,” created a populist furor that reached as high as Prime Minister David Cameron, who called the comments “completely wrong.”

Lawyers for New York City were rebuffed in their attempts to subpoena interview outtakes from documentary filmmaker Ken Burns’s movie about five men who were convicted and later cleared in the racially charged Central Park jogger rape case in 1989, Russ Buettner writes. The lawyers subpoenaed the interviews and notes from Mr. Burns as part of their defense against a federal lawsuit brought by the men. Mr. Burns fought the subpoena, calling it an assault on journalism that could have chilling repercussions, while the lawyers contended that Mr. Burns’s production company had veered from journalism into advocacy. Mr. Burns said he “jumped up and down” when he heard of the decision.

The World Wildlife Fund has launched a new public service campaign to promote awareness of the brutal poaching of wild animals without resorting to disturbingly graphic images, Andrew Adam Newman reports. The campaign is based around print ads at places like airports, buses and bus shelters that show, for example, a close-up of a tiger above the words “I am not a rug.” The ad space is donated, and the campaign will also feature an online push via Facebook and Twitter.

Snickers is taking a new approach to their well-regarded “you’re not you when you’re hungry” ad campaign, this time in print, Stuart Elliott writes.  The new ads incorporate coupons to show that hunger affects decision-making. The first ad is intended for hungry boyfriends, husbands and significant others, with a coupon for 20 percent off a bouquet from ProFlowers. Underneath the coupon are the words “If hunger caused a delayed reaction to ‘Is she prettier than me?’ use this coupon. But next time, eat a Snickers.” The coupons are redeemable online and are also available on social media like the Snickers fan page and Twitter account.

A new interactive graphic shows how trailers from five of the nine films nominated for best picture at the Oscars were put together, Melena Ryzik explains. Some trailers follow the chronological order of their films while others choose scenes throughout the film, and they tend to mirror a film’s tone and pace. There are also sometimes discrepancies between what appears in a trailer and what appears in a film.

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/20/the-breakfast-meeting-a-childrens-app-breaks-ground-for-viacom-and-essay-on-royals-causes-uproar/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Suit Claims Cisco Helped China Pursue Falun Gong

SAN FRANCISCO — Cisco, the maker of Internet routing gear, customized its technology to help China track members of the Falun Gong spiritual movement, according to a federal lawsuit filed last week by members of the movement.

The lawsuit, which relies on internal sales materials, also said that Cisco had tried to market its equipment to the Chinese government by using inflammatory language that stemmed from the Maoist Cultural Revolution.

The suit was filed Thursday in Federal District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose by the Human Rights Law Foundation on behalf of members of Falun Gong. It contends that Cisco helped design the controversial “Golden Shield” firewall that is used to censor the Internet and track opponents of the Chinese government. The lawsuit names several Cisco executives, including the chairman and chief executive, John T. Chambers.

It seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages and to enjoin Cisco from unlawful activity.

When evidence of the company’s activities in China became public in 2008 through a leaked PowerPoint presentation, Cisco disassociated itself from the marketing materials, stating that they were the work of a low-level employee. On Friday the company said in a statement that there was “no basis” for the allegations and that it intended to “vigorously” defend itself.

“Cisco does not operate networks in China or elsewhere, nor does Cisco customize our products in any way that would facilitate censorship or repression,” the company stated.

The suit claims that additional Cisco marketing presentations prove that it promoted its technology as being capable of taking aim at dissident groups. In one marketing slide, the goals of the Golden Shield are described as to “douzheng evil Falun Gong cult and other hostile elements.” Douzheng is a Chinese term used to describe the persecution of undesirable groups. It was widely used by the Communist Party in the Cultural Revolution.

The 52-page lawsuit describes the Golden Shield as a system intended to censor Internet traffic flowing into China, and to identify and monitor opponents of the Chinese government. The suit states that Falun Gong members who used the Internet were tracked by the Golden Shield and then apprehended.

Members of the group who were arrested were tortured, and one member was beaten to death, the lawsuit says. Another plaintiff who was arrested has since vanished, the suit claims, and is presumed to be dead.

The lawsuit challenges Cisco’s assertion that it did not help design the firewall system or customize technology that it sold to meet government surveillance and censorship requirements.

Terri Marsh, a lawyer for the Human Rights Law Foundation in Washington, said the group had compiled detailed information about Cisco’s role in the design of Chinese information centers that host Falun Gong database applications connected to network surveillance and tracking systems. This information will be disclosed in court during the discovery phase of the trial, Ms. Marsh said.

The lawsuit states that other documents lay out design suggestions to the Chinese Ministry of Public Security on how to pursue dissidents effectively.

The lawsuit is based on the Alien Torts Statute, a federal law that permits foreign nationals to bring lawsuits in United States federal court claiming violations of international law. They also have brought charges under the Torture Victim Protection Act and under California state law.

The suit names three Falun Gong members, Ivy He, of Canada; Liu Guifu, of New York State; and Charles Lee, an American citizen who was arrested when he went to China in 2003 and was held until 2006. It also is brought on behalf of eight unidentified Chinese citizens, who include those who were tortured and killed or are missing.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=3e5cfcc15ce5653031c2a114110ac6e6