April 24, 2024

DealBook: Europe Bank Shares Rebound After Cuts

A branch of Credit Suisse in Basel, Switzerland. The I.R.S. asked for help in locating information on American account holders.Arnd Wiegmann/ReutersThe Swiss firm Credit Suisse had its credit score cut three notches.

6:48 a.m. | Updated

LONDON — Shares in many of Europe’s banks rebounded in late morning trading on Friday after initially trading lower, as investors reacted to a new round of credit downgrades for the world’s largest financial institutions.

The volatility in trading activity followed the decision late Thursday by the credit agency Moody’s Investors Service to cut the credit scores of major banks to new lows, reflecting new risks the industry has encountered since the financial crisis began.

Despite the widespread downgrades, analysts said the markets had already reacted to much of the pressures that have hit banks’ trading operations and affected their balance sheets.

The Euro Stoxx bank index, which contains the Continent’s largest financial institutions, has fallen 46 percent in the last 12 months.

This was reflected in how investors reacted to European bank stocks on Friday.

The Swiss firm Credit Suisse, which was warned last week by the country’s central bank to increase its capital reserves, faced a three-notch downgrade, the only bank to have such a pronounced reduction in its credit rating.

Credit Suisse’s share price, which fell as much as 1.9 percent in early morning trading in Zurich, rebounded to trade down less than 1 percent by early afternoon. The Swiss firm said it remained one of the best rated banks by Moody’s Investors Service in its peer group.

The credit rating of UBS was cut by two notches, which was slightly less than many analysts had been expecting. The Swiss financial firm’s shares, which dropped by 1.1 percent in early trading, also came back to trade around 0.4 percent higher on early Friday afternoon.

Moody’s said the wholesale downgrades across the banking industry reflected firms’ exposure to global financial markets, which have come under pressure from the European debt crisis and a broader slowdown in the global economy.

‘‘All of the banks affected by today’s actions have significant exposure to the volatility and risk of outsized losses inherent to capital markets activities,’’ Moody’s global banking managing director, Greg Bauer, said in a statement.

Several European banks with exposure to capital markets, including Barclays of London, Deutsche Bank of Germany and BNP Paribas of France, all had their credit ratings cut by two notches. Shares of the three firms, which all fell approximately 1 percent early morning trading, all traded up around 1 percent by late morning.

The British bank HSBC, which has major operations in the fast-growing emerging markets in Asia, fared better than many of its European competitors after Moody’s cut its credit rating by only one notch. The bank’s stock rose less than 1 percent in morning trading in London.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/06/22/shares-in-european-banks-fall-on-ratings-downgrade/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Ackermann Hands Over Reins of Deutsche Bank

FRANKFURT — Josef Ackermann bowed out Thursday as the chief executive of Deutsche Bank after more than a decade in which he transformed the institution into a global contender but also became a symbol to many Germans of the excesses of capitalism.

At the bank’s annual meeting, Mr. Ackermann passed his responsibilities to two subordinates who will run the bank in tandem. Anshu Jain, a native of India who has been in charge of Deutsche Bank’s investment banking operations, will serve as co-chief executive with Jürgen Fitschen, a German whose title is head of Deutsche Bank regional management.

Mr. Ackermann’s talent for drawing both accolades and catcalls was on view during his last appearance before shareholders in an arena often used for rock concerts. Among a crowd of about 7,000 — a record for the company’s meetings — there were some boos and shouted insults as Mr. Ackermann reviewed the bank’s achievements in the last decade. But at the end of his speech shareholders gave him a standing ovation.

Under Mr. Ackermann, the stock has ridden a roller coaster, peaking above 100 euros, or $124, in 2007 but falling below 20 euros in 2009. On Thursday, the shares closed at 29.09 euros.

“I have done my duty and served the company with all my strength,” said Mr. Ackermann, who is retiring, at age 64, having stayed longer than initially planned.

Mr. Ackermann, a Swiss citizen who joined Deutsche Bank from Credit Suisse in 1996 and became chief executive in 2002, made Deutsche Bank a force in international banking while also becoming an influential figure in political circles. Since the financial crisis and subsequent sovereign debt debacle weakened other German banks, Deutsche Bank remains the country’s only institution able to compete with the likes of Goldman Sachs or JPMorgan Chase.

But there were hints Thursday of the succession struggle that marred Mr. Ackermann’s final years at the bank and helped derail plans for him to become chairman of the supervisory board, a part-time oversight role that many of his predecessors have held. During a speech to shareholders, Mr. Ackermann made only the briefest mention of his successors, Mr. Jain and Mr. Fitschen, saying they ‘‘can build on what we have achieved together.’’

The investment banking business run by Mr. Jain, 49, has often been responsible for most of Deutsche Bank’s profit, which last year was 4.3 billion euros. But some critics have questioned putting an investment banker at the head of the institution when risk-taking by traders is under fire, and when Deutsche Bank is trying to re-emphasize traditional businesses like retail banking.

Mr. Fitschen is seen as a transitional figure who will help compensate for Mr. Jain’s lack of fluency in German and maintain the bank’s close ties to political leaders in Europe. At 63, Mr. Fitschen is just a few months younger than Mr. Ackermann.

While Deutsche Bank earned most of its 32 billion euros of revenue last year outside Germany, many Germans regard the bank as de facto common property, although the government has no stake — ‘‘half a bank and half a part of Germany,’’ as the newspaper Handelsblatt wrote recently.

As usual, the annual meeting was a mass event with thousands of shareholders converging on a Frankfurt arena that in a few weeks will be used for a concert by the American rappers Jay-Z and Kanye West. The shareholders lined up for wurst and potato salad at buffet tables, and there was even a place where they could have souvenir photos taken.

Leaders including the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, or Jean-Claude Trichet, president of the European Central Bank until last year, sought Mr. Ackermann’s views, particularly after the financial crisis exploded in 2008. He was also an advocate for banking interests as president of the Institute of International Finance, an industry group whose membership also includes most large U.S. banks.

But Mr. Ackermann has drawn his share of controversy. His salary of 6.3 million euros in 2011 was not outlandish compared with those of the leaders of other big banks. But in some years he has been the highest-paid chief executive in Germany, becoming to some a symbol of corporate greed.

Deutsche Bank has also come under fire for what some critics regard as an unusually high number of lawsuits by aggrieved customers or official investigations. In early May, Deutsche Bank agreed to pay the U.S. government more than $200 million to settle accusations that it knowingly misled the Department of Housing and Urban Development about the quality of mortgages that later defaulted.

“We are concerned about the number of litigations and investigations which have mounted in the last few years,” said Hans-Christoph Hirt, global head of corporate engagement at Hermes Equity Ownership Services, a unit of Hermes Fund Managers that represents several large Deutsche Bank shareholders.

“This doesn’t look good and raises concerns about how new business opportunities and business activities are assessed before they are entered into,” Mr. Hirt said.

Mr. Ackermann acknowledged that the bank had made mistakes. “No business can be worth risking the bank’s reputation and credibility,” he said. “From today’s perspective, and I underline today’s perspective, we did not always completely live up to this principle during the years of excessive exuberance prior to the financial crisis.”

Mr. Hirt also criticized what he said was weak oversight by the bank’s supervisory board, which he blamed for an unseemly public battle over who would succeed Mr. Ackermann.

Clemens Börsig, who ceded his seat as chairman of the supervisory board Thursday, resigned amid criticism of the way he handled the selection of Mr. Ackermann’s successor. And he had warred openly with Mr. Ackermann.

But the two men shook hands warmly on stage at the annual meeting. ‘‘Contrary to press reports, we always worked together in a collegial spirit in the interests of the bank,’’ Mr. Ackermann said.

The relationship between Mr. Ackermann and Mr. Jain, his onetime protégé, also seemed to cool in recent years. During his speech to shareholders, Mr. Ackermann lavished praise on two top executives, Hugo Bänziger and Hermann-Josef Lamberti, who are leaving to make way for managers close to Mr. Jain.

Mr. Börsiis also leaving as chairman of the supervisory board and will be replaced by Paul Achleitner, former head of Goldman Sachs in Germany and until this week chief financial officer of Allianz, a Munich insurance company.

While there is a tradition among Deutsche Bank chief executives of taking over the supervisory board after they retire, some investors objected to Mr. Ackermann’s assuming that role, fearing he might impede his successor. So Mr. Ackermann chose not to seek the post, rather than face possible opposition in the annual meeting.

Mr. Achleitner, who at 55 is young to head the supervisory board of a large German company, is expected to be an activist chairman. That could create friction with Mr. Jain. But Mr. Hirt of Hermes said he welcomed Mr. Achleitner’s influence.

The supervisory board, Mr. Hirt said, should “think a little about the culture and think about the reasons for all the litigation and investigations. That’s really an area we would like them to focus on.”

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05/31/ackermann-hands-over-reins-of-deutsche-bank/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Glaxo Amends Its $2.59 Billion Bid for Human Genome Sciences

LONDON — The British drug maker GlaxoSmithKline changed the terms of its $2.59 billion proposed takeover of Human Genome Sciences on Wednesday in response to the biotechnology company’s shareholder rights plan, or poison pill.

Last week, Human Genome Sciences had adopted the poison pill, which activates when a third party acquires 15 percent of the company’s stock, as a defensive strategy to ward off Glaxo’s takeover approach.

In response, Glaxo said it had added a condition to its bid, requiring Human Genome Sciences to either redeem the poison pill or ensure that the strategy did not block Glaxo’s approach for the company.

Glaxo has given shareholders in Human Genome Sciences until June 7 to agree to its $13-a-share offer.

The Human Genome Sciences board has already rejected the offer, saying it undervalues the company. While shares in the company are currently trading around $14, the stock has fallen approximately 50 percent in the last 12 months.

Despite rejecting Glaxo’s bid, Human Genome Sciences has said it is looking at its strategic options, which might lead to the company sell itself.

The company, which had asked Glaxo to participate in the discussions, said it was in talks with a number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies about a potential sale, though no decision had been made.

Lazard and Morgan Stanley are advising Glaxo on the deal, while Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs are advising Human Genome Sciences.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/glaxo-amends-2-59-billion-takeover-offer-for-human-genome-sciences/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: UBS’s Chief Risk Officer Steps Down

Philip J. Lofts is returning to his old position as chief risk officer for UBS.Martin Ruetschi/European Pressphoto AgencyPhilip J. Lofts is returning to his old position as chief risk officer for UBS.

LONDON — UBS, the Swiss bank that blamed a former trader for a $2.3 billion loss earlier this year, said on Thursday that its chief risk officer had departed after less than a year in the job.

Maureen Miskovic, who joined UBS in January as head of risk, was succeeded by her predecessor, Philip J. Lofts, the bank said in a statement. Robert J. McCann, head of wealth management for the Americas, succeeded Mr. Lofts as head of the Americas.

UBS also named Ulrich Körner as chief executive of Europe, the Middle East and Africa, a position previously held by Sergio P. Ermotti before he was named chief executive of the bank last month. Mr. Körner, who joined UBS from Credit Suisse in 2009, also remains chief operating officer of the bank.

Revolving Door
View all posts

The management changes come two weeks after Mr. Ermotti was named permanent chief executive at UBS. He assumed the job on an interim basis in September after Oswald J. Grübel resigned as a result of the trading scandal.

A spokesman for UBS denied the trading loss lead to the departure of Ms. Miskovic, a former risk officer at State Street and Lehman Brothers Holdings in the United States.

“I would like to thank Maureen for her contributions and dedication to UBS, and wish her the best in her future endeavors,” Mr. Ermotti wrote in an internal e-mail obtained by DealBook.

During his time as head of risk, Mr. Lofts “demonstrated that he has the broad skills and experience and the strong leadership needed to run our risk organization decisively in a turbulent market environment.”

Mr. Ermotti told investors last month that he planned to increase return on equity, a measure of profitability, by reducing weaker business units and focusing on the more successful wealth management operation. He also pledged to restore the bank’s reputation, which was damaged after the bank discovered the large trading loss.

Kweku M. Adoboli, the former trader who has been charged with fraud and false accounting for the trades, has yet to enter a plea and faces a court hearing in London this month.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/12/01/ubs-chief-risk-officer-steps-down/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: BP to Sell Canadian Natural Gas Unit for $1.67 Billion

A BP gas station in Romford, Britain.Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg NewsA BP gas station in Romford, England.

LONDON – BP agreed on Thursday to sell its Canadian natural gas liquids business to Plains All American Pipeline for $1.67 billion as BP continues to streamline its operations and bolster its balance sheet.

The cash sale is part of BP’s plan to raise $45 billion by selling assets and businesses to strengthen its finances in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster last year. BP said it would remain active in Canada.

“Canada remains an important part of our portfolio of growth opportunities to meet North America’s energy needs,” Robert Dudley, BP’s chief executive, said in a statement.

The company has already agreed to sell about $20 billion in assets. In November, BP increased its sales goal to $45 billion, including the disposal of half of its American refining capacity in the Carson and Texas City plants. BP had set aside $40 billion to pay for costs related to the Gulf oil spill.

In November, BP’s $7.1 billion deal to sell a majority stake in the Argentine oil producer Pan American Energy to the Bridas Corporation fell through. Bridas, a joint venture between Bridas Energy of Argentina and Cnooc of China, withdrew its offer because certain conditions were not met.

The Canadian natural gas liquids business, which employs about 450 people, includes plants and storage facilities, BP said. It owns assets that gather, store and distribute natural gas liquids in Canada and the Midwest.

The sale to a Canadian unit of Plains All American Pipeline, which is based in Houston, is expected to be completed by June, subject to necessary government and regulatory approvals. Credit Suisse advised BP on the transaction. Barclays Capital advised Plains All American Pipeline.

“BP’s Canadian N.G.L. business is an asset-rich platform that significantly expands our L.P.G. asset footprint,” Greg L. Armstrong, chairman and chief executive of Plains All American, said in a statement. It is “a supply-based complement to our existing demand-focused business and making PAA one of the largest L.P.G. service providers in North America,” he said.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/12/01/bp-to-sell-canadian-gas-group-for-1-67-billion/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: BP to Sell Canadian Gas Group for $1.67 Billion

LONDON – BP agreed on Thursday to sell its Canadian natural gas liquids business to Plains All American Pipeline for $1.67 billion as BP continues to streamline its operations and bolster its balance sheet.

The cash sale is part of BP’s plan to raise $45 billion by selling assets and businesses to strengthen its finances in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster last year. BP said it would remain active in Canada.

“Canada remains an important part of our portfolio of growth opportunities to meet North America’s energy needs,” Robert Dudley, BP’s chief executive, said in a statement.

The company has already agreed to sell about $20 billion in assets. In November, BP increased its sales goal to $45 billion, including the disposal of half of its American refining capacity in the Carson and Texas City plants. BP had set aside $40 billion to pay for costs related to the Gulf oil spill.

In November, BP’s $7.1 billion deal to sell a majority stake in the Argentine oil producer Pan American Energy to the Bridas Corporation fell through. Bridas, a joint venture between Bridas Energy of Argentina and Cnooc of China, withdrew its offer because certain conditions were not met.

The Canadian natural gas liquids business, which employs about 450 people, includes plants and storage facilities, BP said. It owns assets that gather, store and distribute natural gas liquids in Canada and the Midwest.

The sale to a Canadian unit of Plains All American Pipeline, which is based in Houston, is expected to be completed by June, subject to necessary government and regulatory approvals. Credit Suisse advised BP on the transaction. Barclays Capital advised Plains All American Pipeline.

“BP’s Canadian N.G.L. business is an asset-rich platform that significantly expands our L.P.G. asset footprint,” Greg L. Armstrong, chairman and chief executive of Plains All American, said in a statement. It is “a supply-based complement to our existing demand-focused business and making PAA one of the largest L.P.G. service providers in North America,” he said.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e5d7e173f131e38f60cc9d603e4022e2

Citigroup to Pay $285 Million to Settle S.E.C. Complaint

The S.E.C. also brought a civil action against a Citigroup employee who was responsible for structuring the transaction, and brought and settled another against the asset management unit of Credit Suisse and a Credit Suisse employee who also had responsibility for the derivative security.

The securities fraud complaint was similar to one the S.E.C. brought against Goldman Sachs last year, with one significant difference. Goldman Sachs was accused of misleading investors about who was picking the investments in a mortgage-related derivative.

It told investors that the bonds would be chosen by an independent manager, when in fact many of them were chosen by John A. Paulson, a hedge fund manager who chose assets that he believed were most likely to lose value, according to the S.E.C.’s complaint in that case. Goldman later settled the case by paying $550 million.

In the Citigroup case, however, it was the bank itself that chose assets for the portfolio that it then bet against. Investors were not told of its role or that Citigroup had an interest that was adverse to the interests of investors.

“The securities laws demand that investors receive more care and candor than Citigroup provided to these C.D.O. investors,” said Robert Khuzami, director of the S.E.C.’s division of enforcement. “Investors were not informed that Citigroup had decided to bet against them and had helped choose the assets that would determine who won or lost.”

The S.E.C. said the $285 million would be returned to investors in the deal, a collateralized debt obligation known as Class V Funding III. The commission said  Citigroup exercised significant influence over the selection of $500 million of assets in the deal’s portfolio.

Citigroup then took a short position against those mortgage-related assets, an investment in which Citigroup would profit if the assets declined in value. The company did not disclose to the investors to whom it sold the collateralized debt obligation that it had helped to select the assets or that it was betting against them.

In a statement, Citigroup said: “We are pleased to put this matter behind us and are focused on contributing to the economic recovery, serving our clients and growing responsibly. Since the crisis, we have bolstered our financial strength, overhauled the risk management function, significantly reduced risk on the balance sheet, and returned to the basics of banking.” The S.E.C. action named Brian Stoker, 40, a Citigroup employee who was primarily responsible for putting together the deal, and Samir H. Bhatt, 37, a Credit Suisse portfolio manager who was primarily responsible for the transaction. Credit Suisse served as the collateral manager for the C.D.O. transaction.

Mr. Stoker, who left Citigroup in 2008, is fighting the S.E.C. case, his lawyer said. Mr. Bhatt settled, agreeing to a six-month suspension from association with any investment adviser.

“There is no basis for the S.E.C. to blame Brian Stoker for these alleged disclosure violations,” said Fraser L. Hunter, a lawyer at WilmerHale representing Mr. Stoker. “He was not responsible for any alleged wrongdoing — he did not control or trade the position, did not prepare the disclosures and did not select the assets. We will vigorously defend this lawsuit.”

The derivative securities lost value remarkably fast. After the deal closed on Feb. 28, 2007, more than 80 percent of the portfolio was downgraded by credit-rating agencies in less than nine months. The security declared “an event of default” on Nov. 19, 2007, and investors eventually lost hundreds of millions of dollars, the S.E.C. said.

Citigroup received fees of $34 million for structuring and marketing the transaction and realized net profits of at least $126 million from its short position. The $285 million settlement includes $160 million in disgorgement plus $30 million in prejudgment interest and a $95 million penalty, all of which will be returned to investors.

The companies and individuals who settled in the case neither admitted nor denied the accusations in the complaint.

The settlement is subject to approval in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York, where the charges were filed.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=30b834eeab99536549766d2b37a1b66f

DealBook: Mack to Step Down as Chairman of Morgan Stanley

7:42 p.m. | Updated

Morgan Stanley’s chairman, John J. Mack, will step down at the end of year, paving the way for the company’s chief executive, James P. Gorman, to take on that role as well.

The bank announced Mr. Mack’s retirement late Thursday morning shortly after its board met by telephone to vote on the transition.

Revolving Door
View all posts

Mr. Mack, a former chief executive of the company, has been chairman since early 2010. He is expected to retain a senior advisory role. He is working on a book about leaders and his years on Wall Street, which is scheduled to be published next September by Simon Shuster.

Mr. Mack, a graduate of Duke University, is expected to join other corporate boards. He already serves on the boards of a number of nonprofit organizations and is chairman of the panel of economic advisers for Jon M. Huntsman Jr., a Republican presidential candidate.

The decision to have Mr. Gorman succeed Mr. Mack as chairman was widely expected.

Mr. Mack, 66, is one of Wall Street’s best-known figures. He worked at Morgan Stanley for years, rising from bond salesman to become the company’s president. After a long-running dispute with Morgan Stanley’s then-chief executive, Philip J. Purcell, he left the company in 2001.

He soon resurfaced at Credit Suisse, which named him chief executive of the Credit Suisse First Boston investment bank, and later co-chief executive of the parent company, the Credit Suisse Group.

At Credit Suisse, he lived up to his nickname “Mack the Knife,” drastically eliminating jobs and cutting costs. But the relationship, in the end, was ill-fated. At one point he proposed merging Credit Suisse First Boston with another investment bank. The Swiss bank’s board disagreed, and his contract lapsed in 2004.

In 2005, after an uprising at Morgan Stanley forced Mr. Purcell to step down, the board asked Mr. Mack to return as chief executive. He received a standing ovation when he walked into the trading floor on his first day.

Yet his record as Morgan Stanley’s leader was mixed. He made riskier bets after returning to the firm, giving it some of its former swagger, but he was unable to pull back in time in 2007 and 2008 as the New York bank sustained significant losses.

During the financial crisis, Morgan Stanley required $10 billion in emergency support from the federal government, as well as a $9 billion investment by the Japanese bank Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group to survive. Mr. Mack, however, received credit for negotiating the Mitsubishi deal, persuading the Japanese bank to move ahead with the partnership despite the difficult environment. Morgan Stanley repaid the government bailout money in 2009.

Mr. Gorman has been running the day-to-day operations of Morgan Stanley since 2010. He has been trying to revive the company’s fortunes, reducing risk and rebuilding units that were injured during the credit crisis.

He has received credit from analysts for his efforts, but Morgan Stanley’s stock, like that of other financial companies, continues to languish. Its shares closed Thursday at $16.59, up $1.11, but down from the $29.60 when Mr. Gorman became chief at the start of 2010. When Mr. Mack took the helm in 2005, Morgan Stanley’s shares were trading above $43.

Morgan Stanley’s move to combine the chief executive and chairman roles is likely to raise eyebrows among corporate governance watchdogs. They typically encourage companies to have a nonexecutive chairman, which they say gives the board a more independent voice.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=560267ce063b087d1d12abfbb638413c

DealBook: John Mack Stepping Down as Chairman of Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley’s chairman, John J. Mack, will step down at the end of year, paving the way for the firm’s chief executive, James P. Gorman, to take the role.

The bank’s board met by telephone on Thursday morning to vote on the decision, according to people familiar with the matter who were not authorized to speak on the record.

Revolving Door
View all posts

Mr. Mack, a former chief executive of the firm, has been chairman since early 2010. He is expected to retain a senior advisory role, and is currently working on a book about leaders and his years on Wall Street, which is scheduled to be published next September.

It is expected that Mr. Mack, a graduate of Duke University, will join other corporate boards. He already sits on a number of not-for-profit boards and is chairman of the panel of economic advisers for the Republican presidential candidate Jon M. Huntsman Jr.

The decision to have Mr. Gorman succeed Mr. Mack as chairman was widely expected.

Mr. Mack, 66, is one of Wall Street’s best-known figures. He worked at Morgan Stanley for years, rising from bond salesman to become the firm’s president. After a long-running dispute with Morgan Stanley’s chief executive, Philip Purcell, he left the firm in 2001.

He soon resurfaced at Credit Suisse, which named him chief executive of the Credit Suisse First Boston investment bank, and later co-C.E.O. of the parent company, the Credit Suisse Group.

At Credit Suisse he lived up to his nickname “Mack the Knife,” drastically reducing jobs and cutting costs. But the relationship, in the end, was ill fated. At one point he proposed merging Credit Suisse First Boston with another investment bank. The Swiss bank’s board disagreed and his contract lapsed in 2004.

In 2005, after an uprising at the bank against Mr. Purcell, the Morgan Stanley board asked Mr. Mack to return as chief executive. He received a standing ovation when he walked into the trading floor on his first day.

Yet his record as Morgan Stanley’s leader was mixed. He ramped up risk after returning to the firm, giving it some of its former swagger, but he was unable to pull it back in time in 2007 and 2008 as the New York bank sustained significant losses.

During the financial crisis, Morgan Stanley required billions of dollars in emergency support from the federal government as well as a big investment by the Japanese bank Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group in order to survive. Mr. Mack, however, received credit for negotiating the Mitsubishi deal, convincing the Japanese bank to move ahead with the partnership despite the difficult environment.

Mr. Gorman has been running the day-to-day operations of Morgan Stanley since 2010. He has been working to turn around the firm’s fortunes, reducing risk and rebuilding units that were injured during the credit crisis.

He has received credit from analysts for his efforts, but Morgan Stanley’s stock, like that of other financial firms, continues to languish. It is currently trading just above $16 a share, down from $29.60 when Mr. Gorman took over. When Mr. Mack took the helm in 2005, Shares of Morgan Stanley were trading above $43.

Morgan Stanley’s move to combine the role of chief executive and chairman is likely to raise eyebrows among corporate governance watchdogs, who typically encourage companies to have a nonexecutive chairman, a move they feel gives the board a more independent voice against management. Wall Street is now split on this issue. Citigroup and Bank of America have split the roles, while Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase — and soon Morgan Stanley — have combined it.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=560267ce063b087d1d12abfbb638413c

Across Globe, Traders Brace for a Downturn

Traders and bankers are braced for another volatile week in global markets — and the wildest ride is likely to be in stocks, not the Treasury bonds that were downgraded by Standard Poor’s on Friday.

The initial shock waves from the downgrade of the government’s credit rating were felt in stock markets over the weekend. Shares plunged in the Middle East on Sunday and were expected to open sharply lower in Asia.

On Wall Street, traders and strategists trekked to their offices on Sunday in scenes reminiscent of the fateful weekend before Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008. Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley all hosted conference calls for anxious investors, and traders plotted strategy for what they expected to be a tumultuous day on Monday.

In Israel, shares fell 7 percent on Sunday, the worst drop since 2000. Investors placed so many sell orders that the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange delayed the opening of trading.

In early trading on Monday, Japanese and Australian stocks fell more than 1 percent. Gold prices were soaring, with spot prices approaching $1,700 an ounce, and the dollar weakened in early trading. In futures trading on Sunday night, major United States stock indexes were down more than 2 percent, although futures are not always reliable indicators of how stocks will open the next day in New York.

One factor that might bolster stocks is the announcement by European leaders on Sunday that they were planning huge purchases of Italian and Spanish bonds in an attempt to reassure nervous investors.

S. P. — the rating agency that issued a historic downgrade of United States Treasury securities to AA+ from AAA on Friday night — is expected this week to downgrade a host of other securities linked to Treasuries. Those include bonds from insurers as well as debt from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled mortgage giants.

Like Treasuries, notes issued by Fannie and Freddie are considered to be among the safest investments, so even a modest downgrade could rattle investors.

“What they did on Friday is a big deal,” said Peter Fisher, the head of fixed-income portfolio management at BlackRock, the giant asset manager. “We’re all waiting to see how they follow through in terms of the knock-on effect.”

At the Newport Beach, Calif., headquarters of Pimco, the world’s largest bond fund manager, the co-chief investment officer, William H. Gross, met with senior money managers and traders as Asian markets prepared to open, and also gathered a skeleton crew of employees to staff the trading desks.

It was the first Sunday that he had gathered his team at the office since Lehman’s collapse in September 2008, Mr. Gross said, adding that he was planning to be back at work at 3:30 Pacific time on Monday morning to gauge the market action in Europe.

“It’s a series of events that comes close to Lehman in terms of the anticipation, and the sleeplessness is similar,” Mr. Gross said. While he said he did not expect stocks or bonds to necessarily plunge this time, volatility reminiscent of the days of the financial crisis might be in store.

Mr. Gross said he expected that investors in only about 1 percent of his firm’s accounts would sell Treasury securities.

At the Manhattan offices of BlackRock, which has $3.6 trillion under management, Mr. Fisher was also at his desk Sunday. He said he did not expect that investors would automatically sell Treasury bonds as a result of the downgrade, but that they might unload riskier assets like stocks and lower-rated bonds.

“If you think the world is a risky place, you start at the outer edges, not what’s least risky,” Mr. Fisher said.

On both sides of the Atlantic, the twin worries of staggering amounts of government debt and slowing economic growth dominated the broader discussion, prompting European leaders to announce the purchases of Italian and Spanish bonds.

For American investors, the downgrade by S. P. comes at an especially jittery moment.

By the time the rating agency acted late Friday, Wall Street had suffered its worst week since the financial crisis, with the Dow Jones industrial average falling 5.75 percent, a slide punctuated by a 512-point drop on Thursday.

Even more than the standoff over raising the federal debt ceiling, the stock market’s plunge was caused by increasing fears that the economy has lost its momentum and could even be on the verge of another recession.

Those worries, compounded by the downgrade, could add up to a one-two punch for stocks.

“Investors who are still on the fence may begin to think a recession is more likely,” said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at S. P. Equity Research, which operates independently of S. P.’s ratings division. “There are a lot of things investors now have to contend with. They have to decide whether the global economy has stepped on a soft patch or on quicksand.”

To be sure, not everyone on Wall Street was calling for doom and gloom. In a note on Sunday, Barry Knapp, a strategist at Barclays Capital, said his firm remained bullish. Stock valuations, he insisted, remain appealing.

Still, in a sign of the anxiety coursing through Wall Street all weekend, nearly 4,000 investors dialed into a conference call organized by Morgan Stanley’s research team. “That’s the most I’ve ever heard of for a Sunday in August,” said Adam Parker, the firm’s chief United States equity strategist.

Echoing Mr. Fisher’s statements, Mr. Parker said that the Morgan Stanley team did not expect Treasuries to take a hit as a result of the downgrade.

But, as fear rises, riskier assets like stocks are likely to suffer, he said. He is recommending that investors avoid the consumer discretionary sector, which means companies like restaurants, retailers and apparel sellers, as well as industrial companies. A safer harbor might be health care companies and utilities.

“With the market having come down this fast, that in and of itself could increase the probability of a recession,” Mr. Parker said.

Bettina Wassener contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=3fbe0a497fa90c21ec31bb2c9a6bb855