April 24, 2024

A Biotech King, Dethroned

Mr. Blech was the initial financial force behind the industry giant Celgene, the rare disease specialist Alexion Pharmaceuticals, and the cancer drug developer Ariad Pharmaceuticals, not to mention Icos, which developed the impotence pill Cialis.

In the early 1990s, Mr. Blech was worth about $300 million and made the Forbes list of 400 wealthiest Americans.

Now, however, he is about to begin a four-year prison term, about $11 million in debt and mainly an afterthought to the industry he helped foster.

He squandered his fortune with reckless borrowing and stock trading in a quest for even greater riches. His Wall Street firm, D. Blech Company, collapsed — dragging biotech share prices down with it — in 1994, on a day some called “Blech Thursday.” Comeback attempts have only gotten him deeper into trouble.

“There’s no question that if I had been in a coma for the last 20 years, I would wake up a billionaire today,” Mr. Blech, 57, said.

Besides what his downfall means for his personal life, it reflects the maturation of the biotechnology industry from its get-rich-quick days, when someone like Mr. Blech, a music major with no scientific training, could make a difference with a few million dollars. Now billions are invested by funds managed by teams of doctors and scientists with Ph.D.’s.

Mr. Blech (pronounced bleck) is to report on Sept. 18 to federal prison in Fort Dix, N.J., having pleaded guilty to manipulating the stock of two biotech companies as part of his latest comeback attempt. He also pleaded guilty to securities fraud in 1998, but avoided prison.

In an interview at his Manhattan apartment, Mr. Blech said he hoped to be remembered for helping to create an industry that has saved lives.

He said his reckless behavior stemmed in part from bipolar disorder, which left him at times feeling invincible and unable to restrain himself.

“I didn’t know how to say no to a deal,” he said.

Critics over the years have said Mr. Blech was merely an aggressive stock promoter who got lucky. They note that Celgene and Alexion did not become successful until long after Mr. Blech was associated with them.

But Mr. Blech still has supporters. Nick Arvanitidis recalled that in 1990, his company, Liposome Technology, was desperate for cash. Other investors spurned him, he said. But “David just wrote me a check for $3 million the same day I went to see him.” That allowed Liposome to survive and develop Doxil, an important cancer drug.

Jeffrey J. Collinson, a venture capitalist, said Mr. Blech saved several companies. “It’s painful to hear what happened and how he got into this position,” Mr. Collinson said. “It’s a sad story.”

It is also an unlikely story. In 1980, Mr. Blech was working as a stockbroker while trying to become a songwriter. That fall, biotechnology pioneer Genentech went public and its share price doubled the first day.

“I can do that,” Mr. Blech, then only 24, told his father, a rabbi who was also a stockbroker. Mr. Blech then called his brother, Isaac, who was working in advertising, and said, “Quit your job, we’re starting a genetics company.”

Sitting around the kitchen table, the three came up with a name — Genetic Systems. Then they had to figure out what the company would actually do.

An article in a science magazine led them to Robert Nowinski at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, who was doing research on a new technology involving something called monoclonal antibodies.

The Blechs promised Dr. Nowinski $200,000 and then raised $1 million from others. Half a year later, Genetic Systems went public and the Blechs’ stake was worth $10 million. In 1986, Bristol-Myers Squibb acquired Genetic Systems for nearly $300 million, and the Blechs were richer still.

David and Isaac Blech went on to form several other companies, some of which ultimately failed. They attracted top scientists, directors and advisers by offering them stock and a chance to get rich. The companies were often taken public quickly, so the Blechs and other early shareholders could realize a return.

Things began going wrong around 1990, when Mr. Blech wanted to expand while his more cautious brother wanted to take a hiatus. The brothers had a rancorous split and have essentially not talked since.

Mr. Blech started D. Blech Company, which underwrote stock offerings. When biotechnology stocks he was involved with weakened, he tried to prop them up by buying more shares, using $65 million in borrowed money. When creditors started calling in the loans, a desperate Mr. Blech started engaging in sham trades to make it look as if he was getting his house in order.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/business/david-blech-a-biotech-king-dethroned.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

More Reports of Avastin Injections Causing Blindness

The latest cases occurred last month at the Veterans Affairs medical center in Los Angeles. Late Thursday, the Department of Veterans Affairs confirmed that the problem had occurred and said that an investigation into the matter was continuing.

“Our deepest sympathy goes out to the veterans affected by the Avastin eye injections,” it said in a statement.

Avastin, made by Genentech, is a cancer drug but is commonly used to treat the wet form of age-related macular degeneration and other eye diseases because it costs only about $50 an injection.

That saves Medicare and patients hundreds of millions of dollars a year compared with using Lucentis, a somewhat similar Genentech drug approved for the treatment of eye diseases but costing about $2,000 an injection.

To use Avastin for eye disease, a vial meant for a cancer patient must be divided into numerous tiny doses and each dose placed in a syringe for injection into the eye. The extra handling increases the risk of bacterial contamination and other problems.

On Tuesday, the Food and Drug Administration issued an alert saying that 12 patients in the Miami area had suffered eye infections after being injected with Avastin. Some of the patients lost all of the remaining vision in their treated eye, the F.D.A. said.

Earlier this year, four patients at the Veterans Affairs hospital in Nashville also suffered infections from the bacterially contaminated Avastin. The family of one man has filed a claim for $4 million, saying the infection left the man blind and with brain damage.

In the cases in Los Angeles, no contaminant has been identified, according to medical professionals and a patient involved. The five patients, who had macular degeneration, all received their injections of Avastin on Aug. 12 at the V.A. Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center in the San Fernando Valley.

“We all ended up in the E.R. over the course of the next few days and put together the connection,” said the patient in Los Angeles. Most of the patients lost all of their vision in the eye that received the injection, he said.

This man, who said his vision had not recovered, spoke on the condition of anonymity because he and other patients were in talks with the V.A. about the situation.

He said he learned from V.A. officials that the drug had come from the pharmacy at the main campus of the V.A. Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System in Los Angeles.

The recent incidents could lead doctors and patients to use the far more expensive Lucentis instead of Avastin. In its statement, Veterans Affairs said that its Los Angeles medical center had suspended use of Avastin for macular degeneration on Aug. 15 and was now buying Lucentis to resume therapy for the 30 to 40 treatments it administers a week.

Some proponents of the use of Avastin say that there have been more than two million injections of the drug to treat eyes over the last six years with few problems.

The cases are also likely to raise questions about so-called compounding pharmacies, which prepare customized drugs for patients, including doses of Avastin to treat eye problems.

The F.D.A. has limited oversight of these pharmacies.

In its alert on Tuesday, the F.D.A. said the 12 cases of lost vision in Miami had been traced to a single compounding pharmacy, which it did not identify.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=fa81a0cb035ca4a242106a56fe9f0434