April 23, 2024

Media Decoder Blog: Britney Spears Said to Be Leaving ‘The X Factor’

Britney Spears will not return for another season of “The X Factor,” TMZ and The Hollywood Reporter said Thursday, opening up another chair at the judges’ table on the Fox singing competition.

Ms. Spears’s intention to leave has been rumored for weeks now, amid underwhelming reviews of her performance on the show, which wrapped up its second season in December. The Web sites cited anonymous sources who said Ms. Spears wanted to focus on her forthcoming album. Fox declined to comment.

Earlier this week, the Fox entertainment chairman, Kevin Reilly, said he thought Ms. Spears “did a really good job,” but said he did not know if she would return. Simon Cowell, the creator of the show and a judge on it, “hasn’t even talked about any of this going forward,” Mr. Reilly said.

Another judge, Antonio Reid, known as L.A., said in December that he was leaving the show. For those keeping score, Mr. Cowell and Demi Lovato are now the only judges left, but Mr. Cowell has plenty of time to recruit new ones before the third season of “The X Factor” begins in the fall.

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/10/britney-spears-said-to-be-leaving-the-x-factor/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: In Cambodia, a Start-Up Combines Web Sales Skills and Hair Extensions

Janice Wilson, founder of Arjuni, shows a finished hair extension, ready for shipping from Phnom Penh, Cambodia.Ron Gluckman for The New York TimesJanice Wilson, founder of Arjuni, shows a finished hair extension, ready for shipping from Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

PHNOM PENH, Cambodia — For an Internet start-up, Arjuni faces more challenges than usual.

The e-commerce site that sells hair extensions operates out of a five-story building here that lacks elevators and, sometimes, power. Employees typically have to travel to remote villages by motorbike or foot to pick up the goods that Arjuni sells. And the office floor is cluttered with piles of hair strands instead of computers.

But like many new ventures, Arjuni is harnessing the latest Internet tools like Twitter and social media to build a loyal customer base.

In just two years, the company, founded by Janice Wilson, has grown from a handful of employees to 80, and it now generates more than $1 million in revenue. The start-up is also slowly gaining market share from the industry’s dominant players in India and China, as well as retailers in the United States and Europe.

“We not only buy and collect the hair ourselves, but sell it directly to our customers. This makes us stand out,” Ms. Wilson said. “We’re small, but considered one of the top brands.”

While hair extensions have been around for decades, they became a fashion craze in recent years, when stars like Paris Hilton and Britney Spears started using them to change their looks. A large proportion of Arjuni customers, like Ms. Wilson, are African-Americans seeking fuller styles for their tresses.

Arjuni workers, many rescued from sex trafficking, clean and groom natural hair.Ron Gluckman for The New York TimesArjuni workers, many rescued from sex trafficking, clean and groom natural hair.

India has long provided much of the world’s natural hair, sold to wholesalers mainly in China, which in turn marketed their products to retailers in Europe and the United States. But Ms. Wilson found that Cambodians have similar hair quality, long with cuticles in alignment.

“Probably 99 percent of the world’s hair comes from India. Nobody had thought of Cambodia,” said Ms. Wilson, 39, straddling piles of hair on the floor.

It is a small but potentially profitable niche. The hair extensions business generates annual revenue of $250 million.

Workers begin sorting the natural-grown hair according to length and quality.Ron Gluckman for The New York TimesWorkers sorting the natural hair according to length and quality.

Ms. Wilson said it was important to her to have a business serve a social purpose. Many of Arjuni’s employees formerly worked in Cambodia’s notorious sex trade.

That effort helped attract seed capital from a Japanese investment fund, Arun, formed in 2009 by Satoko Kono to help social enterprises in emerging nations. “We like how Arjuni is employing women, and helping the needy,” said Ms. Kono, who spent a decade with development organizations in Cambodia.

Additional money came from the Cambodian Export Market Access Fund, which is a World Bank-financed project that helps companies trying to develop exports. The rest came from her savings, friends and family.

A lawyer by training, Ms. Wilson has built her business by making customers feel engaged in the product via the Internet.

Customers eagerly describe their orders on home videos that they upload on YouTube, with segments on topics like hair design, delivery and grooming. Clients are encouraged to send in pictures of starlets they want to emulate, like Catherine Zeta-Jones or Beyoncé. Arjuni also floods Facebook with testimonials and promotions.

“Our clients are fanatical about hair,” said Tiyana Peters, who oversees social media for Arjuni. “We get everything from wedding photos afterward to details on how the boyfriends react.”

By dealing direct with customers, Arjuni eliminates the added cost of working through another retailer or site. Extensions can cost thousands of dollars, but typically average around $500.

The Internet has helped with damage control, as well. After rumors spread online that Arjuni was stealing hair or forcing women to sell it, the company began regularly posting more information on its operations on networking sites.

“This was totally untrue. We buy the hair at fair prices, and tried to explain it, but there isn’t much you can do,” Ms. Wilson said. “Our company grew up in the age of social media,” she said. “Social media is huge, and has helped us, but these accusations really stung.”

Her idea for the start-up was an evolution of sorts. Ms. Wilson, originally from Green Bay, Wis., was on vacation in Cambodia four years ago, she began thinking about opportunities to start a business here.

Cambodia was in the midst of an economic boom and had the fastest-growing economy in Asia, after China, for several years running. One of the hottest sectors was real estate. Ms. Wilson, who was working for a real estate firm in Colorado, decided to move to Cambodia, and with local partners, planned a development near the temples of Angkor, the country’s top tourist attraction.

When Cambodia’s property market suffered along with the global economy, she faced a grim challenge. “I either had to give up and go back to America, or find something else to do,” she recalled.

The collapse of Cambodia’s textile industry largely as a result of cheap competition from China led to her idea. Cambodian workers with sewing skills were suddenly unemployed, and nobody had looked at Cambodian hair as a marketable material before.

“I was thinking, what is recession-proof?” Ms. Wilson recalled. The answer: “vanity.”

The best — and most expensive — hair extensions are made from natural human hair, which is cut, cleaned and sewn into individual pieces. “It was low-tech, they just needed to learn how to make them, and we just needed sewing machines. We could use the skills already here,” she said.

The business was also a way to help workers develop marketable skills. Ms. Wilson now provides employees with free English, computer and math classes. A third of workers come from troubled situations like sex trafficking or spousal abuse. “But we run everything as a business,” Ms. Wilson said.

Ms. Wilson acknowledged that she and her staff members were extremely ambitious at the outset, “trying to do everything at once — collection, fabrication and distribution.” But they have been able to keep up the frenzied pace as the company grew.

“It’s definitely been difficult to scale up,” Ms. Wilson said. “But it does make us better quality.”

This spring, Arjuni added yet another facet to its operation — a series of in-person events in the United States called Halo, where her staff could meet and help groom customers.

“Do I feel I have aged a lot? Definitely,” Ms. Wilson said. “But I love being an entrepreneur. I love the challenges.”

“When I worked in a law office, I was bored out of my mind,” she added. “When you have this entrepreneurial spirit, you just have to do it.”

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05/28/in-cambodia-a-start-up-uses-the-internet-to-sell-hair/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Economix: Snookinomics

DESCRIPTIONJoe Coomber/Sipa Press Nicole (Snooki) Polizzi can generate big money for clubs.

In Sunday’s Styles section I had a piece on the untapped intellectual universe of Snookinomics: a back-of-the-envelope calculation for why Nicole Polizzi who is known as Snooki can charge $25,000 to drink for a few hours at a nightclub — or, more controversially, $32,000 to talk at Rutgers, more than that university is paying the Nobel laureate Toni Morrison.

So how could Snooki be “worth” more than a Nobel Prize-winner?

The discrepancy has nothing to do with their respective “intrinsic” values to society, however you might quantify those. Rather, it’s all about market forces. There is high demand for Snooki, and other reality-TV celebrities, because the venues that host her find that she provides a very handsome return on their investment.

By my back-of-the-envelope calculation, Snooki can bring revenue that is tenfold her appearance fee, at least for the spring break party last month at the club LAX in Las Vegas, which I used as a case study.

After all, with Snooki on tap, clubs can expect bigger volume, more drinking and higher rollers. But the biggest payoff comes from the publicity associated with an event with a household name.

If your club hosts Ms. Polizzi or Kim Kardashian or Britney Spears, you can almost be assured coverage in at least one of the sublimely popular celebrity tabloids. To that end you’ll also probably require your celebrity guest to sign a “non-compete” agreement, which says she can’t party at any competing clubs while she’s in town. This is pretty standard practice, so that you can capture all the publicity associated with her appearance — and thereby assure future traffic.

“If we don’t book a celebrity now because we think it’s too expensive, then we know we won’t be in any of the magazines, and we won’t be on TV, and that hurts our revenue next month,” said Alex Cordova, who is the vice president for marketing for Angel Management Group, which owns and manages some of the hottest clubs in Las Vegas, including LAX. “It’s a business like any other, and you need to make a good investment that pays off,” he said.

In the case of Rutgers, the international coverage the Snooki event received — even if not all positive — raised the university’s visibility.

I asked Cision, a company that tracks media coverage, to estimate the dollar value of all the various mentions of Snooki’s appearance at Rutgers. Jay Krall, the company’s business development manager, sent me the following calculation, based roughly on what all those press shout-outs would cost if bought as advertising:

Plenty of voices in both news media and social media have been calling for the university to spend its money in more substantive ways than attracting less-than-cerebral celebrities. But that’s not the whole story, much of this exposure puts the Rutgers name in front of new eyeballs, and not always in a bad light. On blogs specifically, I found that the coverage was 75 percent neutral, 10 percent positive and 15 percent negative in tone toward the event (this is programmatic sentiment analysis so there is some margin for error, missed sarcasm, etc.). This breakdown is fairly typical, most mentions of any news story are simple pass-alongs, though often presented with a silent smirk that’s hard to quantify, with no opinion expressed outright. The exposure from those neutral mentions contributes a considerable amount of publicity value to the event despite the negative coverage. Still, I’m discounting substantially for potshot mentions in my valuation here…

Mainstream media

14 mentions in daily newspapers, including the Toronto Star and Los Angeles Times. Also 1,161 mentions on News Web sites, 297 mentions on broadcast television including Conan and Chelsea Lately.

Mainstream news publicity value: $174,806

Blogs Twitter

7,180 people commented on, linked to, Liked, bookmarked or voted for 2,098 blog posts

Blog publicity value: $136,017

15,169 tweets (including one very widely retweeted one from @time) received by a total of 26.9 million followers

Twitter publicity value: $35,012

Total Publicity Value: $345,835

I’m going to go out on a limb here and bet that a Nobel laureate’s commencement lecture probably does not attract the same amount of coverage — unless that laureate is being written up precisely because she’s earning less than a reality TV star.

(For a similar exercise, see this post on Spider-man economics.)

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=866557aa19ccd491d6414f49ffd75924