April 23, 2024

France’s Treasury Chief Works to Guard Credit Rating

Mr. Fernandez, the head of the Treasury within the Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Industry, has already been through a similar crisis-management exercise. That came in early August, when Standard Poor’s cut the top credit rating of the United States government while most of the French elite was on vacation.

Within hours on a summer Saturday morning, Mr. Fernandez helped organize a series of emergency calls with his boss, Finance Minister François Baroin, and others in Paris’s circle of policy makers, to prevent the American crisis from sending a financial tsunami across the Atlantic.

Later that day, Mr. Baroin appeared on French television to question the validity of the United States downgrade. President Sarkozy interrupted his vacation in a show of engagement. But behind the scenes, Mr. Fernandez did much of the heavy lifting.

It was not the first time in the two-year-long European crisis that Mr. Fernandez has quietly kept things moving. And it probably will not be the last.

As France and Germany take the lead in trying to hold the euro currency union together, Mr. Fernandez has emerged as one of Paris’s top power brokers — whether in promoting the French position on the banking sector’s participation in a Greek bailout, or the creation of a rescue fund for troubled countries, or the recent deal by most European Union governments to shore up the foundations of the euro zone.

So much confidence has been placed in Mr. Fernandez that the French news media have started calling him the “guardian of the triple-A.”

But Mr. Fernandez, at 44 a youthful technocrat whose soft blue eyes belie an inner sang-froid, chuckles about the moniker with an almost embarrassed air.

“I’m a civil servant,” he said demurely. “I do what I have to do.”

What he must do now could prove crucial to how well France weathers the country’s seemingly inevitable debt downgrade. Because the demotion has been widely telegraphed by the three major credit rating agencies, Mr. Fernandez and other officials do not expect the impact to be devastating.

Still, a lower credit rating will probably make it more expensive for France to service its debt, and more difficult for the Europewide rescue fund — of which France is a major backer — to operate. That, in turn, could renew tensions between France and Germany over how to manage the euro crisis.

For every photo op in which Mr. Sarkozy and Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany trumpet a new step forward, Mr. Fernandez has spent countless hours behind the scenes with an influential man in the presidential cabinet, Xavier Musca, Mr. Sarkozy’s powerful chief of staff, and Berlin’s point man, Jörg Asmussen, to smooth and soothe the sometimes testy French-German relationship.

Mr. Fernandez also exchanges e-mails frequently with officials at the Treasury Department to keep up on developments across the Atlantic. And his ability to parse mind-numbing financial issues better than nearly any other French civil servant helped French leaders look smart during the Group of 20 meetings to which France played host in 2011.

Doing all this largely below the public radar is apparently the way Mr. Fernandez prefers to work. In a country where discretion is a highly prized commodity, his effectiveness comes from operating in the shadows.

“Ramon is the right man in the right place,” said Christine Lagarde, who worked with Mr. Fernandez until last summer, when she resigned as France’s finance minister to become the managing director of the International Monetary Fund.

“He is smart, experienced, a good negotiator, but also a critical part of a close-knit network of advisers to the leading political figures,” Ms. Lagarde said.

For Mr. Fernandez’s efforts, he was made a chevalier of the French Legion of Honor in December, in a ceremony under the gilded ceilings of the Élysée Palace. Mr. Sarkozy cited Mr. Fernandez as a pillar in the management of France’s future.

Yet such moments are rare. Mr. Fernandez generally eschews the elitist trappings embraced by most other government dignitaries.

He rides a motor scooter to work, for example. The idea of being chauffeured around “gives me a headache,” he said. On the scooter, “you take some fresh air, and you are forced to focus on just one thing.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=89d4e3e22c8c3d4a7241cd5fae9e99f3

Moody’s Downgrades Cyprus Over Economic Woes

LONDON — In the latest downgrade to hit a euro-zone country, Cyprus had its credit rating cut by Moody’s Investor Service on Wednesday because of its banking exposure to Greece, political jostling and recent disruptions to the country’s power supply.

Moody’s cut the country’s long-term government bond rating two levels to Baa1 — still an investment grade — from A2. It assigned a negative outlook, signaling the next move may be another downgrade, and also cut the country’s short-term ratings.

An explosion at a naval base earlier this month badly damaged the Vasilikos power plant, which supplies about half of the country’s power generation capacity. That has caused regular power outages, and Moody’s said in a statement that the power shortage is likely to hurt the economy, which it now expects to stagnate this year, and expand only 1 percent next year.

The rating agency also cited the “increasingly fractious domestic political climate” and “the material risk that at least some Cypriot banks will require state support over the medium term as a result of their exposure to Greece” as a reason for the downgrade.

Cyprus bonds fell on Wednesday and Italian and Spanish bonds also dropped as investors became increasingly concerned whether an aid package assembled this month by European leaders to help Greece’s troubled finances and restore confidence in the euro zone would be enough. The yield on Cyprus’s 10-year bond rose 0.13 percentage points to 10.043 percent.

Banks in Cyprus continue to hold “substantial” Greek debt and would be affected in the case of a sovereign debt default, Moody’s said.

The ratings agency also said it was concerned about the large role the banking sector plays in the Cypriot economy. Bank assets amount to about 600 percent of gross domestic product in Cyprus, excluding foreign bank subsidiaries, Moody’s said.

The July 11 explosion that destroyed the plant and killed 13 people also rattled the government. Costas Papacostas, the defense minister, and Petros Tsalikidis, chief of the national guard, resigned amid criticism about failing to take steps that could have prevented the accident. Some 98 gunpowder containers were left stacked for more than two years in an open field near the power station.

The political friction might make it harder for the center-left government, which does not have an absolute majority in parliament, to push through various spending cuts and privatizations announced on July 1.

“This adverse development increases implementation risk to the government’s plans, many of which will require not just cross-party support but also acceptance by the trade unions,” Moody’s said.

On Tuesday, a number of parties accused the government of backtracking because they feared an angry backlash from Cyprus’s powerful labor unions, Reuters reported from Nicosia.

Cyprus, which adopted the euro on Jan. 1, 2008, is seeking to bring down a budget deficit that hit 5.3 percent of gross domestic product last year.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e0715796354b9376bacefb2e22853727

Iceland’s Big Thaw

During Iceland’s boom years, which lasted from 2003 until 2008, a customer showed up at Guffi’s dealership wanting to buy a Porsche on credit, no money down. Guffi didn’t inquire about the man’s line of work; in fact, he didn’t care if the man paid back the loan — that was the bank’s problem, not his. Guffi sold the Porsche, and the customer drove it for a month or so until the first payment was due. The man had no interest in making the payment, and so Guffi, who always aimed to please, helped the man resell the vehicle for a profit. Guffi did the same thing a month later, and again a month after that; all told, Guffi sold the same car five times in six months, amazingly charging a higher price on each successive sale.

To understand how this strategy was even possible, it helps to know a little about banking in Iceland. In 2001, the Icelandic government began relinquishing control of the banking sector to allow for privatization. One consequence, says Gylfi Zoega, a professor of economics at the University of Iceland, was that “ownership of the banks went to a few wealthy businessmen.” These businessmen, Zoega says, hired local bankers, who had very limited experience in international banking, to run things; they issued bonds on the international market, where institutional investors were only too happy to buy them. After all, this wasn’t Argentina — this was Iceland, a Scandinavian country whose national banks had no history of defaulting on their loans. “It appeared to be a sound investment,” Zoega says. Money poured into the country, and the economy boomed. With the help of the banks, investors went on spending sprees, buying large stakes in foreign and domestic businesses; the prices of everything from houses to used cars soared; Iceland’s stock market spiked, rising 900 percent between 2002 and 2008; and, of course, money flowed into the hands of all sorts of Icelanders, like Guffi.

Guffi sold a lot of cars during the boom, but he didn’t save much. When I asked him what he spent his money on, he replied that he traveled widely, skied often and entertained a number of girlfriends from abroad. “Take a look at the beautiful girls from Ukraine and Switzerland,” he told me wistfully. “You’re like a kid in a toy store. Several times, I’ve brought them home so that they can have a vacation here. Then I show them Iceland.” He added, thoughtfully: “What I was doing was good for the tourism business.”

At first, it was all going splendidly for Guffi as he Rollerbladed down Laugavegur Street with voluptuous girlfriends and sold and resold the same luxury cars. Then he became tired — exhausted, really. He was working 13-hour days. “Do you know how much time it takes to bring all those papers to the bank every time someone takes out a loan for a car?” he asked me. The girlfriends also proved enervating. “I found girls on the Internet; that’s heavy work. You’re reading all these stupid letters that they send.” By the time the crash hit, in late 2008, Guffi was relieved. Nowadays he sells fewer cars; he no longer regularly earns more money each time he sells the same car, but he still gets a commission, and his lifestyle is simpler. “I do nothing stupid, and then I have no stress,” he explained happily. “I have no more Ukrainian or Swiss girlfriends. I have an Icelandic woman now.”

Jake Halpern (jakehalpern@yahoo.com) is the author of “Fame Junkies.” His last article for the magazine was about freegans in Buffalo. Editor: Sheila Glaser (s.glaser-maggroup@nytimes.com).

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=0b88b65acb84555699bb20e15fdfa536

Stocks & Bonds: Critical Reports on Banks Weigh on Financial Shares

A Senate report released late Wednesday criticized rating agencies and banks, like Goldman Sachs, for their practices during the financial crisis, while federal regulators also released a report saying that banks did a poor job of handling the flood of foreclosures. The regulators said they would impose penalties, without giving the timing or amount.

In response, the banking sector was down almost 1 percent Thursday. Among the decliners were some of the 14 mortgage servicers that had signed consent agreements promising to overhaul their foreclosure practices.

“The uncertainty over this whole mortgage mess is contributing” to the decline in the financial sector, said Anthony G. Valeri, a senior vice president and market strategist for LPL Financial. “I think the market is waiting to see what the fines will be.”

“But it is a short-term concern for the market until we ultimately find out what the exact dollar amount is,” he said.

JPMorgan Chase, one of the banks signing a consent agreement, said it would add as many as 3,000 employees to meet the new regulatory demands. Its shares were down 2.8 percent at $44.97. Among other major banks, Citigroup fell 1.6 percent to $4.43; Bank of America was down 1.1 percent to $13.13; Wells Fargo declined 1.7 percent to $30.15; and Goldman Sachs lost 2.7 percent to $155.79.

Major indexes closed the day mixed. The Dow Jones industrial average rose 14.16 points, or 0.12 percent, to 12,285.15, while the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index added less than a point to close at 1,314.52. The Nasdaq composite slipped 1.3 points, or 0.05 percent, to 2.760.22.

Alan B. Lancz, the president of Alan B. Lancz Associates, said indexes might have gotten late-day help from initial public offerings, like that of the car-sharing company Zipcar, which gained 56 percent.

“As we headed into the last hour they were still showing significant gains,” Mr. Lancz said. “That maybe gave a spark to the buyers.”

Google rose $2.23, to $578.51, in the regular session but lost more than 5 percent in after-hours trading after reporting a quarterly profit that missed forecasts.

Shares of consumer staples were up 0.63 percent as a sector. Supervalu gained more than 16 percent, to $10.61, after forecasting fiscal-year earnings above Wall Street expectations. Kraft Foods closed at $32.95 and Coca-Cola at $68.31, each gaining more than 1 percent.

While the banking sector’s responsibility for the mortgage crisis drew most of the attention, analysts said other factors also weighed on the sector.

Nomura analysts said in a research note that a downward revision to gross domestic product, negative revenue and loan growth and an unpredictable regulatory backdrop have discouraged investors.

“We have spent the past few weeks on the road visiting investors,” the analysts said. “The overwhelming feedback on banks has been ‘Why bother?’ ”

“It’s just hard to get people to care about bank stocks right now,” Nomura said.

An increase in unemployment filings last week also weighed on the markets, as well as a monthly index on producer prices that showed energy costs were responsible for almost all of the increase in March.

Economists are concerned that increases in wholesales prices will be passed along and damp spending by consumers.

Downward revisions to economic growth, like the recent cut by the International Monetary Fund in its United States growth estimate, may have discouraged investors, Mr. Valeri added.

But the bond market has benefited. The yield on the 10-year Treasury bond was little changed Thursday at 3.5 percent.

“We thought going into this week that it would be a tough week for Treasuries given the fresh supply,” Mr. Valeri said, referring to an auction of 10-year bonds. “A new theme emerging this week that seems to have trumped the data, and even the auctions, was the potential of a slowdown in the economy.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=020af463424071306512cea4fab8ab8e

Critical Reports on Banks Weigh on Financial Shares

A Senate report released late Wednesday criticized rating agencies and banks, like Goldman Sachs, for their practices during the financial crisis, while federal regulators also released a report saying that banks did a poor job of handling the flood of foreclosures. The regulators said they would impose penalties, without giving the timing or amount.

In response, the banking sector was down almost 1 percent Thursday. Among the decliners were some of the 14 mortgage servicers that had signed consent agreements promising to overhaul their foreclosure practices.

“The uncertainty over this whole mortgage mess is contributing” to the decline in the financial sector, said Anthony G. Valeri, a senior vice president and market strategist for LPL Financial. “I think the market is waiting to see what the fines will be.”

“But it is a short-term concern for the market until we ultimately find out what the exact dollar amount is,” he said.

JPMorgan Chase, one of the banks signing a consent agreement, said it would add as many as 3,000 employees to meet the new regulatory demands. Its shares were down 2.8 percent at $44.97. Among other major banks, Citigroup fell 1.6 percent to $4.43; Bank of America was down 1.1 percent to $13.13; Wells Fargo declined 1.7 percent to $30.15; and Goldman Sachs lost 2.7 percent to $155.79.

Major indexes closed the day mixed. The Dow Jones industrial average rose 14.16 points, or 0.12 percent, to 12,285.15, while the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index added less than a point to close at 1,314.52. The Nasdaq composite slipped 1.3 points, or 0.05 percent, to 2.760.22.

Alan B. Lancz, the president of Alan B. Lancz Associates, said indexes might have gotten late-day help from initial public offerings, like that of the car-sharing company Zipcar, which gained 56 percent.

“As we headed into the last hour they were still showing significant gains,” Mr. Lancz said. “That maybe gave a spark to the buyers.”

Google rose $2.23, to $578.51, in the regular session but lost more than 5 percent in after-hours trading after reporting a quarterly profit that missed forecasts.

Shares of consumer staples were up 0.63 percent as a sector. Supervalu gained more than 16 percent, to $10.61, after forecasting fiscal-year earnings above Wall Street expectations. Kraft Foods closed at $32.95 and Coca-Cola at $68.31, each gaining more than 1 percent.

While the banking sector’s responsibility for the mortgage crisis drew most of the attention, analysts said other factors also weighed on the sector.

Nomura analysts said in a research note that a downward revision to gross domestic product, negative revenue and loan growth and an unpredictable regulatory backdrop have discouraged investors.

“We have spent the past few weeks on the road visiting investors,” the analysts said. “The overwhelming feedback on banks has been ‘Why bother?’ ”

“It’s just hard to get people to care about bank stocks right now,” Nomura said.

An increase in unemployment filings last week also weighed on the markets, as well as a monthly index on producer prices that showed energy costs were responsible for almost all of the increase in March.

Economists are concerned that increases in wholesales prices will be passed along and damp spending by consumers.

Downward revisions to economic growth, like the recent cut by the International Monetary Fund in its United States growth estimate, may have discouraged investors, Mr. Valeri added.

But the bond market has benefited. The yield on the 10-year Treasury bond was little changed Thursday at 3.5 percent.

“We thought going into this week that it would be a tough week for Treasuries given the fresh supply,” Mr. Valeri said, referring to an auction of 10-year bonds. “A new theme emerging this week that seems to have trumped the data, and even the auctions, was the potential of a slowdown in the economy.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=2405040902db0d5f433a86d690e72941

Critical Reports on Banks Prompt Fall in Financial Shares

A Senate report on Wednesday criticized ratings agencies and banks, like Goldman Sachs, for their practices during the mortgage crisis, while federal regulators also released a report saying that banks did a poor job of handling the flood of foreclosures. The regulators said they would impose penalties, without giving the timing or amount.

The banking sector was down almost 1 percent Thursday. Among the decliners were some of the 14 mortgage servicers that have signed consent agreements promising changes related to the regulators’ report.

“The uncertainty over this whole mortgage mess is contributing” to the decline in the financial sector, said Anthony G. Valeri, a senior vice president and market strategist for LPL Financial. “I think the market is waiting to see what the fines will be.”

“But it is a short-term concern for the market until we ultimately find out what the exact dollar amount is,” he said.

JPMorgan Chase, one of the servicers signing the agreement, said that it was adding as many as 3,000 employees to meet the new regulatory demands. Its shares were down 2.75 percent. Citigroup fell 1.3 percent; Bank of America was down 0.79 percent; Wells Fargo declined 1.7 percent, and Goldman Sachs lost 2.7 percent.

Indexes had been lower through most of the day but regrouped as the session neared a close. The Dow Jones industrial average closed 0.12 percent or 14.16 points higher, while the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index added less than a point and the Nasdaq lost slightly more than a point.

Alan B. Lancz, the president of Alan B. Lancz Associates, said the market might have gotten a late-day help from initial public offerings, like Zipcar, which was up 56 percent.

“As we headed into the last hour they were still showing significant gains,” he said. “That maybe gave a spark of catalyst to the buyers and that is why you see a fairly stronger day compared to what it looked like on the outset.”

Google also strengthened just ahead of its earnings, which supported the Nasdaq, he said.In addition, shares of consumer staples were up 0.56 percent as a sector, with Kraft Foods and Coca-Cola each gaining more than 1 percent.

While it was the banking sector that drew the most attention, analysts said other economic factors were at work.

Nomura analysts said in a research note that downward revisions to gross domestic product, negative revenue and loan growth, and an unpredictable regulatory backdrop have discouraged investors.

“We have spent the past few weeks on the road visiting investors,” the analysts said. “The overwhelming feedback on banks has been why bother.”

“It’s just hard to get people to care about bank stocks right now,” Nomura said.

An increase in unemployment filings last week also weighed on the markets as well as a monthly index on producer prices, which showed that energy costs were responsible for almost all of the increase in March.

Economists are concerned that increases in wholesales prices will be passed along and damp spending by consumers.

Recent downward revisions to economic growth, like that from the International Monetary Fund, may have damped sentiment, Mr. Valeri added.

But the bond market has benefited. The benchmark 10-year yields were little changed at 3.46 percent.

“We thought going into this week that it would be a tough week for Treasuries given the fresh supply,” Mr. Valeri said, referring to an auction of 10-year bonds. “A new theme emerging this week that seems to have trumped the data, and even the auctions, was the potential of a slowdown in the economy.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/business/15market.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Political Disputes Cloud Portuguese Bailout Talk

LISBON — International creditors started discussing the terms of a bailout for Portugal on Tuesday amid concerns that their initial challenge would be to sort out the country’s political disputes rather than its financial situation.

The negotiators will seek to persuade feuding political parties to bury differences that have intensified in the buildup to a general election on June 5, which was called because of a parliamentary standoff over how to clean up the Portuguese government’s finances.

The creditors are expected to negotiate an assistance program for Portugal worth about 80 billion euros, or $116 billion, that is both broader and more stringent than a package of austerity measures that lawmakers rejected last month.

The rejection led to the resignation of Prime Minister José Sócrates, who remains at the helm of a caretaker Socialist government until the general election.

Officials from the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund will also want the terms of such a program to be endorsed by Portuguese opposition parties to ensure that a deal remains binding whatever the outcome of the June 5 vote.

Despite the political wrangling in Lisbon, analysts suggested that Portugal could not afford to delay a bailout deal beyond mid-May, the deadline set by European Union finance ministers last week.

“Political divisions are likely to keep weighing on the drafting of the program,” Tullia Bucco, an economist at UniCredit, wrote in a research report. “But the involvement of I.M.F. and E.U. officials should help ease potential tensions and forge a consensus on the needed measures.”

The bailout talks in Lisbon this week are expected to start with a technical assessment of Portugal’s finances, including the accounts of its banking sector.

To add to the uncertainty, the election might not produce a clear-cut outcome. The main opposition Social Democratic Party is expected to win, but without an absolute majority. The most recent opinion poll, released last week and carried out by the Catholic University of Portugal, showed Mr. Sócrates and his Socialist party narrowing the gap — an outcome that raised the possibility of a hung Parliament.

“Nobody looking at Portugal’s economic and political prospects should rule out Sócrates at this stage, because he has certainly not lost as much support as one might expect in this crisis and is at his strongest when campaigning,” said Cristina Casalinho, chief economist of BPI, a Portuguese bank.

Tough conditions set by international creditors could set off more social unrest and raise protectionist sentiment, playing into the hands of far-left politicians, led by the Communists, who arguably remain more powerful in Portugal than anywhere else in Western Europe.

This week, leftist groups started erecting billboards around Lisbon condemning an anticipated demand by creditors for more privatizations, under the slogan that “With the I.M.F., the one who pays is you.”

Portugal is following Greece and Ireland in requiring international assistance. The concern in Portugal is that tough bailout terms will leave the country with crippling repayment obligations that the country cannot count on economic growth to help it meet. The monetary fund projects that Portugal will remain in recession until 2012.

Political feuding in Lisbon has kept Portugal’s debt yields close to record highs since the rescue request last week. The yield on 10-year Portuguese bonds rose one basis point, or one hundredth of a percentage point, to 8.411 percent on Tuesday.

Portugal’s woes are being watched in Spain, a much larger euro zone economy that has also been in investors’ firing line because of its budget deficit and troubled banking sector. Spain’s borrowing terms have improved in recent weeks, however, after the central government met its 2010 deficit target. The yield on 10-year Spanish bonds fell 5 basis points Tuesday to 5.165 percent.

In a further vote of confidence, the Chinese prime minister, Wen Jiabao, said Tuesday that China would continue buying Spanish bonds, after recently buying about 6 billion euros. His comments followed a meeting in Beijing with Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero.

Having resisted for months the idea of a bailout, the Portuguese authorities now insist some of the rescue financing must be delivered by June. The Portuguese Treasury had a cash balance of 3.3 billion euros at the end of March, which it subsequently strengthened by selling some additional debt — although at high interest rates — to meet 4.5 billion euros in repayments due Friday.

Portugal next faces repayment obligations of about 7 billion euros in June, its toughest refinancing hurdle of the year.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=c2cb7190c10b15b91a00c60e510870d3

Irish Banks Need an Additional €24 Billion, Central Bank Says

While largely expected by the market, the total aid figure was still a jarring number — one that increases the total bill for bailing out Ireland’s banks to about €70 billion, or about $99 billion, and increases government control of the banking sector.

The Irish bank losses come amid fresh concerns that Europe’s banking problems are getting worse, not better. In Spain, which is experiencing a real estate collapse similar to Ireland’s, a plan for four troubled savings banks, or cajas, to merge fell through Wednesday, raising concerns there that, as was the case in Ireland, Spain might be underestimating the depth of its banking crisis.

“This has been one of the costliest banking crises in history,” said Patrick Honohan, the governor of the Central Bank of Ireland, which oversaw the stress tests. “There was a need for the banks to have ample capital to meet the markets gloomy prognostications.”

The market’s reaction was for the most part muted. The yield on 10-year Irish bonds rose 0.1 percent point Thursday, to 10 percent, just off the all-time high of 10.3 percent.

Expected or not, the large figure will give the new Irish government fresh ammunition to push more forcefully its view that holders of senior, unsecured bank debt — a security that is riskier in nature than one that is currently guaranteed by the government — should take a loss on their position to ease the state’s punishing debt burden.

So far the European Union and the International Monetary Fund have resisted such a move, arguing that to restructure any amount of debt would be more a political than a practical measure. They also contend that restructuring would create a broader market panic as investors unload not just their Irish holdings, but similar exposure in other weak economies like Greece, Spain and Portugal.

Ireland’s banks relied on the European Central Bank for €88.7 billion of financing at the end of February, the central bank said. The Irish finance minister, Michael Noonan, said Thursday that the E.C.B. had agreed to extend its financing over the medium term to give Ireland’s banks more time to work through their problems.

The €24 billion figure comprises €13.3 billion for Allied Irish Banks, €5.2 billion for Bank of Ireland, and the rest for two smaller institutions, Irish Life Permanent and EBS Building Society. EBS will be folded into Allied Irish, the central bank said.

Also on Thursday, another fallen Irish bank, Anglo Irish, announced the largest loss in the country’s corporate history — €17.7 billion. Anglo Irish, which is expected to receive €34 billion from the state, was not included in the stress test as it is being gradually sold.

Officials of the central bank said the stress test, which was conducted with the U.S. money management firm BlackRock, had come as close as possible to exposing the extent of bad loans still remaining in the system.

“This is as definitive as can be without being categoric,” said one official, who declined to give his name as he was not authorized to speak publicly.

Officials said the process of reducing the Irish funding gap, or the difference between bank deposits and loans, will take years and will require the write-off and disposal of €72 billion in problem loans by 2013.

It will also require a revival of depositor and investor confidence, neither of which seems imminent.

The gap, also known as the loan-to-deposit ratio, now stands at 171 percent against a government goal of 122 percent. The shortfall is being financed by the European Central Bank and the Irish Central Bank to the tune of about €150 billion, an amount that is about equal to the country’s gross domestic product.

Repaying this obligation will be one of the central challenges for the government in the years ahead.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=78e5607741abcbc1fdbdd499ebfc8255