April 19, 2024

European Finance Heads Strive to Reach an Accord on Banking Oversight

European leaders were expected to hail the breakthrough, which gives the European Central Bank the leading supervisory role over lenders, as a sign they are taking concrete steps to maintain the viability of the euro.

“This is an accord that creates true bank supervision,” Pierre Moscovici, the French finance minister, told reporters after 14 hours of talks. “Step by step, we are resolving the crisis in the euro zone,” he said.

“We have reached the main points to establish a European banking supervisor that should take on its work in 2014,” said Wolfgang Schaeuble, the German finance minister.

The deal would put more than 100 large banks in Europe under the direct supervision of the central bank leaving thousands of smaller banks primarily overseen by national regulators. But the ministers insisted that the European Central Bank would be able to take over supervision of any bank in the euro area at any time.

The idea behind the single supervisor is to make lenders less susceptible to political interference than has been the case under the present system of national supervisors, which failed to prevent banks from accumulating so much debt that they put the finances of states like Ireland and Spain at risk, in turn threatening the future of the single currency.

The agreement on a single supervisor should be a springboard for European leaders to discuss later on Thursday steps leading to a broader banking union, like a common system for the orderly closure of failing banks and, eventually, to measures to reinforce Europe’s economic and monetary union, like the creation of a shock-absorption fund to shore up the economies of vulnerable members of the euro zone.

The European Parliament and some national parliaments, including in Germany, still must approve the deal before it becomes law.

To reach the deal, France agreed to a formula where only banks holding €30 billion ($39 billion) in assets, or holding assets greater than 20 percent of their country’s gross domestic product, would be directly regulated by the central bank. Previously France had insisted that all 6,000 banks in the euro area should be closely regulated by the central bank.

Germany had sought a reduced remit that would make the job of the supervisor more manageable and faced pressure from a powerful domestic banking lobby trying to shield many small German savings banks from closer scrutiny. But Germany agreed to allow the central bank to step in and take over the supervision of any bank in the euro area at its discretion.

The Germans also had concerns the central bank could be tempted to alter decisions on monetary policy to make its supervisory job easier, and they wanted to give the system some accountability. As a compromise, Germany agreed to give member states greater scope than originally foreseen to challenge central bank decisions.

Britain, which remains outside the 17 European countries that form the euro zone, had been seeking assurances that it could be exempt from orders from the new supervisor that would affect its banks operating abroad and lenders operating in the City of London. Britain agreed to a formula that should allow it and other countries outside the system to block most, but probably not all, decisions on rule making taken by the E.C.B., and to oppose decisions in cross-border banking disputes it disagrees with.

Britain’s chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, told reporter he had ensured “that the countries that weren’t going to join the banking union, like Britain, were protected and their interests were protected.”

For countries like Spain and Ireland, the supervisor is a prerequisite for allowing them to tap a European bailout fund and inject rescue aid directly into their troubled banks. That would allow those governments to avoid weighing down their national balance sheets with yet more debt.

But the system for the direct recapitalization of banks is only likely to go ahead only once the supervisor is fully operating, and well after a German general election in October. German citizens have grown weary of paying most of the bill for bailouts.

Leaders also must clarify whether the system should apply in cases, like Spain and Ireland, where banks ran into problems before the introduction of the single supervisor.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/13/business/global/eu-leaders-try-to-show-unity-on-bank-supervision.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

E.U. Finance Ministers Deadlock on Plan to Oversee Banks

The ministers agreed to reconvene next week, a day ahead of a summit meeting of European Union leaders who had been hoping to focus discussion on the design of a banking union — something the leaders agreed last summer to establish as a way to safeguard the industry after member countries racked up enormous debts bailing out their banks.

That agreement in June had called for setting up the single regulator under the European Central Bank. And the bloc’s administrative arm, the European Commission, has proposed phasing in the system beginning Jan. 1.

But the deadlock on Tuesday indicated that there was sharp disagreement among member states over how many banks in the euro currency union should be covered by the new system; how to ensure that countries outside the currency union have a way to rebuff regulations they dislike; and how to ensure that the European Central Bank would keep monetary policy separate from its decisions on bank supervision.

After ministers failed to reach agreement Tuesday during their regular monthly meeting, Vassos Shiarly, the finance minister of Cyprus, the country holding the Union’s rotating presidency, set another session for Dec. 12.

If ministers fail to reach agreement at that meeting, the E.U. leaders will arrive at their summit meeting the following day without a cornerstone in place for the banking union. One of the goals for the union could eventually be to issue debt jointly backed by euro zone countries, as a way to buffer the sort of interest rate spikes that have often bedeviled weaker countries, including Spain.

Some ministers warned on Tuesday that further delays in designing the banking union could lead to a return of acute financial pressures in the euro zone. “If we are not able to deliver in the dates we have committed, this will not be neutral in terms of the stability of the markets,” said Luis de Guindos, the Spanish economy minister.

For Spain, stricter supervision was supposed to be the condition for using European funds to bail out its troubled banks directly and a way to avoid accumulating more sovereign debt. Once the supervisor is in place, Spain wants the money it is drawing upon for its bailout to be moved off its government ledgers.

But France and Germany remained divided over the new banking rules on Tuesday. That is a significant obstacle because agreement between the two countries usually is needed to accomplish major reforms in Europe.

Pierre Moscovici, the French finance minister, told the meeting that the new rules should apply to all lenders rather than lead to a two-tier system.

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany has suggested that the system could eventually apply to all 6,000 banks in the euro zone. But some German officials and industry groups would rather have the new centralized oversight apply only to the biggest European banks, and leave regulation of the country’s smaller savings banks in the hands of national officials.

French officials have stressed the need for a system that covers all euro zone banks. Otherwise, the French have warned, any sudden intervention by the E.C.B. into the affairs of a bank under national regulation could raise alarm among investors and depositors and even lead to bank runs.

But Wolfgang Schäuble, the German finance minister, said Tuesday that trying to give too much central authority to a new banking regulator would meet stiff political opposition in his country.

“I think it would be very difficult to get an approval by the German Parliament if you would leave the supervision for all the German banks to European banking supervision,” Mr. Schäuble told the meeting. “Nobody believes that any European institution will be capable to supervise 6,000 banks in Europe.”

The government in Berlin has complained that overly rapid implementation of the rules could lead to regulatory loopholes. German state governments also have balked at giving the central bank oversight of their sparkassen, the hundreds of small and midsize savings banks that do much of the lending to consumers and small businesses.

Germany also refused to support one of the main British demands: new voting rules to ensure that lenders based in London continue to be regulated by Britain.

Yet another concern for Mr. Schäuble was whether placing so much supervisory power within the European Central Bank could lead the central bank to compromise its decisions on monetary policy — if, for example, the E.C.B. were setting interest rates while also trying to oversee politically sensitive issues like bank bailouts.

“In the long run, you will damage the independence of the central bank,” Mr. Schäuble told the meeting.

Germany is the biggest financial contributor to the European Union, and establishing the single supervisory system could oblige Ms. Merkel to dip into the treasury to help prop up weaker European banks, like many of those in Spain. Such aid could be an issue for German taxpayers, ahead of national elections in their country next September. German citizens have already grown weary of paying most of the bill for bailouts, and they are wary of using more money to help banks in vulnerable southern European countries.

Another issue to be resolved in coming weeks will be the leadership of the group of ministers who oversee the euro area.

Jean-Claude Juncker, who has been the group’s president since 2005, reiterated at a news conference Monday night that he would step down at the end of this year or at the beginning of next year.

But he declined to signal his preference for any particular successor to the post, which gives the holder significant power over the agendas of their meetings.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/business/global/daily-euro-zone-watch.html?partner=rss&emc=rss