April 23, 2024

BBC Chairman Says Network Needs Radical Overhaul

“Does the BBC need a thorough structural overhaul? Of course it does,” the chairman of the BBC Trust, Chris Patten, said on “The Andrew Marr Show,” the BBC’s flagship Sunday morning talk show, after the resignation of the broadcaster’s chief executive.

But although Mr. Patten has said that the BBC’s handling of the scandal was marked by “unacceptably shoddy journalism,” he pushed back on the Marr show against suggestions that the crisis could lead to a dismantling of the BBC as it now exists, with 23,000 employees, a $6 billion annual budget and a dominant role in British broadcasting.

Mr. Patten, 68, a former Conservative cabinet minister who gained a reputation for feisty independence when he was Britain’s last colonial governor in Hong Kong, said critics of the BBC should not lose sight of its reputation at home and abroad for trustworthy journalism.

“The BBC is and has been hugely respected around the world,” he said. “But we have to earn that. If the BBC loses that, then it is over.”

Public confidence in the broadcaster has slumped further in opinion polls in the wake of its coverage of a scandal involving allegations of abuses by a senior politician at a children’s home in Wales in the 1970s and ’80s. But the British public would not support breaking up the BBC, Mr. Patten said, adding, “The BBC is one of the things that has come to define and reflect Britishness, and we shouldn’t lose that.”

Barely 12 hours earlier, Mr. Patten stood outside the BBC’s new billion-dollar London headquarters with George Entwistle, the departing director general, as Mr. Entwistle announced his resignation, after only eight weeks in the post, to atone for his failings in dealing with what he called “the exceptional events of the past few weeks.”

Mr. Entwistle’s resignation was prompted by outrage over a Nov. 2 report on “Newsnight,” a current affairs program, that wrongly implicated a former Conservative Party politician in the scandal. Responding to reports that the “Newsnight” segment was broadcast without some basic fact-checking that would have exculpated the 70-year-old retired politician it implicated, Alistair McAlpine, Mr. Entwistle said it reflected “unacceptable journalistic standards” and never should have been broadcast.

That episode, which Mr. McAlpine’s lawyers have said would be the subject of a defamation lawsuit, compounded the problems facing the network since revelations last month about a longtime BBC television host, Jimmy Savile, who died at 84 in 2011. Mr. Savile was suspected of having sexually abused as many as 300 young people over decades in the BBC’s studios and in children’s homes and hospitals where he gained ready access as a campaigner for children’s charities.

The BBC has been accused of covering up the Savile matter by canceling a “Newsnight” report on the accusations against him last December and going ahead with several Christmas specials that paid tribute to Mr. Savile.

The producer of “Newsnight” told his staff members that the Savile investigation was not adequately substantiated by their reporting, but at least one “Newsnight” staff member noted that the producer said that he had come under pressure on the issue from BBC managers. At that time, Mr. Entwistle was in charge of all the BBC’s television productions and was seeking to succeed Mark Thompson, who stepped down in September after eight years as director general. Mr. Entwistle has said that he was not informed beforehand of the nature of the “Newsnight” investigation or the reasons for its cancellation.

On Monday, Mr. Thompson will begin his new post as president and chief executive of The New York Times Company. He has said he knew nothing beforehand about the “Newsnight” investigation of Mr. Savile or the decision to scrap it — not even that it involved allegations of pedophilia — and that he had never met Mr. Savile. But Mr. Thompson has said that he is willing to answer any questions put to him by a parliamentary inquiry or a raft of other investigations now under way.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/12/world/europe/bbc-shaken-by-bungled-report-needs-radical-overhaul-its-chairman-says.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Labour Party Vows to Fight Murdoch’s Bid to Take Over Satellite Company

The News Corporation effort to buy the 61 percent of the company it does not already own had been in peril because of the phone-hacking scandal that led to the shutdown this weekend of The News of the World, the tabloid that was one of Mr. Murdoch’s biggest newspapers. Many commentators in Britain saw the closing of the paper as a move to cauterize the phone-hacking crisis and save the bid for the much more profitable company, known as BSkyB.

The Labour Party’s new move against the takeover came as the 80-year-old Mr. Murdoch landed at an airport outside London to take direct control of the crisis that has enveloped his company from executives of News International, News Corporation’s London-based subsidiary.

Apparently keen to emphasize his support for his management team in Britain, officials of News International arranged later in the day for news photographs to be taken of a smiling Mr. Murdoch with his son James, News International’s chairman, and Rebekah Brooks, a former News of the World editor who is the subsidiary’s chief executive. The two have been the focus of much of the public outrage that has been directed at the Murdoch empire in Britain since the long-smoldering phone-hacking scandal re-erupted last week.

Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, announced his intention to force a Commons vote on the takeover on a BBC Sunday morning talk show, saying that he regretted having to take the step but believed that Prime Minister David Cameron had left no other option to bid opponents with his refusal to take steps to halt the takeover. Mr. Cameron has said that his governing coalition of Conservatives and Liberal Democrats is bound by law not to interfere in the regulatory review of the British Sky Broadcasting bid, which has already moved close to clearing the deal.

Under questioning by Andrew Marr, the BBC host, Mr. Miliband denied that he had “declared war on Rupert Murdoch” — who is already Britain’s most powerful media magnate, with a daunting political influence over decades that has led governments in Britain, Labour and Conservative, to seek his favor.

The reluctance of politicians to alienate powerful media barons was acknowledged with unusual candor on Friday by Mr. Cameron, who told a news conference that The News of the World scandal showed the importance of curbing what he called the “cozy” relationship in Britain between the media, politicians and the police. At a news conference, he announced plans for new regulatory controls to eliminate a pattern of unhealthy and potentially unlawful collaboration among them.

Mr. Miliband minced no words in demanding that Mr. Cameron reverse course on the British Sky Broadcasting takeover and instruct the cabinet minister responsible, Jeremy Hunt, the culture secretary, to refer the bid to Britain’s Competition Commission, which has the power to kill the bid by ruling that it would lead to excessive concentration of ownership in Britain’s media.

This spring, Mr. Hunt issued an initial ruling that would spare the bid from scrutiny by the commission, but delayed a final decision pending a mandatory delay to allow for public submissions. On Friday, Mr. Hunt announced that he had received 156,000 submissions and a collective protest with another 100,000 signatures.

Mr. Cameron, Mr. Miliband said, “has got to understand that when the public have seen the disgusting revelations that we have seen this week, the idea that this organization, which has engaged in these terrible practices, should be allowed to take over BSkyB, to get that 100 percent stake, without the criminal investigation having being completed and on the basis of assurances from that self-same organization — frankly, that just won’t wash with the public.”

The Cameron government, with a majority in the Commons and the power to set the chamber’s agenda, could seek to block the Miliband move for a vote on the proposed takeover. But with the phone-hacking scandal roiling the political landscape in Britain like no other event in years, blocking a vote would be a risky move. Signaling a keen sense of the public fury over the phone-hacking and the political price for failing to engage with it, Mr. Cameron has announced plans for two public inquiries into the scandal: one into the hacking itself, and what the prime minister has called the “abysmal failure” of Scotland Yard to investigate it effectively over a five-year period until this year, and another into the “culture, practices and ethics” of British newspapers.

The prime minister’s calculations may be influenced by his coalition partners, the Liberal Democrats, who have declared their own opposition to the takeover, at least until the criminal cases arising from the phone-hacking have been completed.

Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrats’ leader, who is deputy prime minister, and Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat who is business secretary in the Cameron cabinet, are said to have made their opposition to the bid known to Mr. Cameron in strong terms, and allowing it to go ahead would most likely add to the severe strains between the coalition partners on other issues that have raised doubts as to how long the coalition can survive.

Ravi Somaiya contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=31e5874900ffb308afd8fde79aede744