April 16, 2024

Boeing Chief Executive Confident About Investigation

The executive, W. James McNerney Jr., said government investigators were making good progress in narrowing the possible causes of a recent battery fire on one 787 and a smoking battery that forced another plane to make an emergency landing in Japan.

In a conference call to discuss the company’s financial performance, Mr. McNerney also said that reports of airlines replacing some of the batteries in the months before those incidents were related to maintenance and not safety concerns.

All Nippon Airways, which operates 17 of the new jets, replaced 10 batteries between May and December, raising questions about reliability, The New York Times reported on Wednesday.

Mr. McNerney acknowledged that the batteries had been replaced at a “slightly higher” rate than the company had expected. But, he added, “What we know is that the replacement cycle that we’ve been experiencing there has been for maintenance reasons. There is no incident where we’re aware of where a battery has been replaced due to any kind of safety concerns.”

Other Boeing officials said a maintenance reason could be faster-than-expected aging, or errors by mechanics, as opposed to a flaw that could start a fire.

Mr. McNerney said he would not speculate on how long it would take to address the safety issues and how much that would cost the company. Aviation analysts have said a financial worst case could involve Boeing switching back to older and less volatile battery technologies, like nickel-cadmium, to restore confidence among air travelers.

But Mr. McNerney said, “Nothing we’ve learned has told us that we made the wrong choice on the battery technology.” He added a moment later that none of the investigative findings “causes us to question that decision at this stage.”

Investigators for the National Transportation Safety Board and their Japanese counterparts have said they have not found anything that could explain the fire and the smoke incidents on the planes.

Mr. McNerney made his comments shortly after Boeing reported a fourth-quarter profit that topped analysts’ estimates. The company also said it was not projecting at this point that the battery problems would have a significant impact on its earnings in 2013, though that could change depending on what the investigations found.

Mr. McNerney said in a statement released with the earnings that fixing the battery problems was the company’s “first order of business for 2013.” And even though all 50 of the 787s delivered so far have been grounded and Boeing has temporarily halted deliveries, Boeing said it still planned to deliver 60 of the planes this year.

Rob Stallard, an analyst with RBC Capital Markets, said in a note to investors that the company’s forecast of Dreamliner deliveries was lower than the 93 he had expected.

Mr. McNerney said in the call with analysts that two other factors would keep the deliveries from rising more rapidly. One is that Boeing is still reworking parts on some of the earliest planes it produced, when it was having problems with suppliers, and it will focus this year on finishing a subset of those that require the most work. He said the company also would begin building a second, larger version of the 787 this year, and integrating that model into the production lines could slow deliveries.

 The Chicago-based company said its net income was $978 million, or $1.28 a share, in the fourth quarter, or 9 cents a share higher than the average estimate from analysts. Still, the net income dropped 30 percent, from $1.39 billion, or $1.84 a share, a year earlier, when a favorable tax settlement bolstered the company’s earnings.

Boeing said its revenue rose 14 percent in the fourth quarter, to $22.3 billion, from $19.55 billion a year earlier.

For all of 2012, Boeing earned $3.9 billion, or $5.11 a share, on revenue of $81.7 billion. It forecast that revenue would rise to $82 billion to $85 billion in 2013 and its net earnings would be in the range of $5 to $5.20 a share.

The company also reported that it had $13.5 billion in cash on hand at the end of 2012, leaving it in strong financial shape to weather any further problems with the batteries.

The lithium-ion batteries are more powerful than older types but also more volatile, and the 787 is the first plane in which Boeing has used them. The planes are the most technologically advanced jets on the market, with lightweight carbon composite structures and new engines that combine to reduce fuel consumption by 20 percent from older planes.

Investigators have said it remains possible that the failures that caused the incidents involving fire and smoke stemmed from flaws in the manufacturing process that could be corrected.

Boeing passed Airbus in 2012 to retake the worldwide lead in aircraft deliveries, a title it had lost in 2003, and said it expected to deliver a total of 635 to 645 planes in 2013.

Mr. McNerney said it was likely to use the new composite technologies to update its larger 777 jets and seek to maintain that advantage over Airbus.

All Nippon Airways said it replaced the 10 batteries last year after a variety of failures that led them to quit working. Boeing officials said some of the batteries might have needed replacing because built-in safeguards had activated to prevent overheating and to keep the drained batteries from being recharged in a risky manner. Boeing also said that if mechanics improperly connected a battery, another safeguard would also render the battery unusable.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/business/boeing-earnings-exceed-estimates.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Strike at Air Canada Disrupts Travel

OTTAWA — Air travelers in Canada faced disruptions after Air Canada’s customer service and ticket agents went on strike early Tuesday morning.

Before the walkout the airline said it planned to offer regular service by using managers in place of the 3,800 striking workers who are members of the Canadian Auto Workers union. The airline also hopes to steer passengers toward online check-in services as well as electronic kiosks at airports.

But a notice to passengers posted before the strike began made it clear that it would not be travel as usual. The airline warned that check-in lines would “be longer than usual with limited available personnel” and it recommended that travelers avoid bringing checked luggage.

Air Canada and WestJet, a low-cost carrier based in Alberta, are the only two airlines offering flights throughout Canada. Further adding to the problems a prolonged strike may create, Air Canada is the only Canadian carrier with service beyond North America and the Caribbean.

The strike is the first walkout at the airline, which was owned by the government of Canada until 1987, in a decade. While neither side discussed what specific issues remained unresolved as the strike began, proposed pension changes were a major source of contention.

Air Canada’s pension plan is underfunded by about 2.1 billion Canadian dollars and pension funding issues caused it to seek creditor protection between 2003 and 2004.

The Canadian Auto Workers said last week that the airline was proposing to reduce pension benefits to current pension plan members by 40 percent. As well, the union said Air Canada wanted to introduce a separate, less generous plan for all employees hired in the future.

Ken Lewenza, the union’s president, also told The Canadian Press, a news agency, on Monday that wage improvements were also a requirement for a settlement.

The strike by the customer relations staff may signal only the beginning of a prolonged period of labor strife for Air Canada, which has about 26,000 employees. The airline’s pilots rejected a proposed contract with the airline last month. The union representing Air Canada’s 6,800 flight attendants asked the federal government to appoint a conciliator in its contract talks. Contract negotiations are also under way with baggage handlers and mechanics.

Adding to the tension between unions and Air Canada was a financial announcement in April showing that total compensation for Calin Rovinescu, the company’s chief executive, was 4.5 million Canadian dollars last year, up from 2.6 million Canadian dollars in 2009.

The airline has noted that Mr. Rovinescu was only with the company for nine months in 2009 and attributed the remainder of the difference to performance payments related to the airline’s return to profitability last year.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=cf25dfd6b2f64b1eceee3dddc04e4dc6